From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: Vineet Gupta <vineet.gupta@linux.dev>, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/3] selftests/bpf: report placeholder tests as SKIP, not OK
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2026 11:53:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8ea12dd89709b03ea358780512ac24fd70b0e83b.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260821201316.1059129-3-vineet.gupta@linux.dev>
On Fri, 2026-08-21 at 13:13 -0700, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> Several verifier test files wrap their contents in a feature gate and provide
> a one-line placeholder program in the #else arm, so the file still yields
> something when the toolchain or JIT cannot support the tested instructions.
>
> However the placeholder is annotated __success, so it reports as a pass,
> whereas this is really a SKIP.
>
> > #318/1 verifier_ldsx/cpuv4 is not supported by compiler or jit, ...:OK
> > #318 verifier_ldsx:OK
>
> This causes skipped coverage to be overlooked: see the next patch where
> BPF_GCC builds miss a whole bunch of test due to clang only gate.
>
> Add a __skip("reason") annotation for a compile-time gate, and use it for the
> placeholders.
>
> After this change, above tests reported as
>
> > #318/1 verifier_ldsx/cpuv4 is not supported by compiler or jit, ...:SKIP
> > #318 verifier_ldsx:SKIP
>
> Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vineet.gupta@linux.dev>
> ---
Neat feature, thanks!
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-24 18:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-21 20:13 [PATCH bpf-next 0/3] selftests/bpf: unblock bpf-gcc test coverage Vineet Gupta
2026-08-21 20:13 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/3] selftests/bpf: name the remaining placeholder programs dummy_test [NFC] Vineet Gupta
2026-08-24 18:46 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-08-21 20:13 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/3] selftests/bpf: report placeholder tests as SKIP, not OK Vineet Gupta
2026-08-21 21:00 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-08-21 23:48 ` Vineet Gupta
2026-08-24 18:53 ` Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2026-08-21 20:13 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/3] selftests/bpf: Enable some of the blocked cpuv4 instruction tests for bpf-gcc Vineet Gupta
2026-08-21 20:19 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-21 23:38 ` Vineet Gupta
2026-08-24 19:04 ` Eduard Zingerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8ea12dd89709b03ea358780512ac24fd70b0e83b.camel@gmail.com \
--to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vineet.gupta@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox