Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/3] selftests/bpf: add tests for TCP_BPF_SOCK_OPS_CB_FLAGS

Martin KaFai Lau
2024-08-06T21:27:10Z

On 8/2/24 8:29 AM, Alan Maguire wrote:
> Add tests to set/get TCP sockopt TCP_BPF_SOCK_OPS_CB_FLAGS via
> bpf_setsockopt() and also add a cgroup/setsockopt program that
> catches setsockopt() for this option and uses bpf_setsockopt()
> to set it. The latter allows us to support modifying sockops
> cb flags on a per-socket basis via setsockopt() without adding
> support into core setsockopt() itself.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
> ---
> .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/setget_sockopt.c | 11 ++++++
> .../selftests/bpf/progs/setget_sockopt.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/setget_sockopt.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/setget_sockopt.c
> index 7d4a9b3d3722..b9c54217a489 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/setget_sockopt.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/setget_sockopt.c
> @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ static int create_netns(void)
> static void test_tcp(int family)
> {
> struct setget_sockopt__bss *bss = skel->bss;
> + int cb_flags = BPF_SOCK_OPS_STATE_CB_FLAG | BPF_SOCK_OPS_RTO_CB_FLAG;
> int sfd, cfd;
>
> memset(bss, 0, sizeof(*bss));
> @@ -56,6 +57,9 @@ static void test_tcp(int family)
> close(sfd);
> return;
> }
> + ASSERT_EQ(setsockopt(sfd, SOL_TCP, TCP_BPF_SOCK_OPS_CB_FLAGS,
> + &cb_flags, sizeof(cb_flags)),
> + 0, "setsockopt cb_flags");

The sfd here is the listen fd. The setsockopt here is after the connection is
established and the connection won't be affected by this setsockopt...

I don't think this test belongs to test_tcp() here, more on this below...

> close(sfd);
> close(cfd);
>
> @@ -65,6 +69,8 @@ static void test_tcp(int family)
> ASSERT_EQ(bss->nr_passive, 1, "nr_passive");
> ASSERT_EQ(bss->nr_socket_post_create, 2, "nr_socket_post_create");
> ASSERT_EQ(bss->nr_binddev, 2, "nr_bind");
> + ASSERT_GE(bss->nr_state, 1, "nr_state");
> + ASSERT_EQ(bss->nr_setsockopt, 1, "nr_setsockopt");
> }
>
> static void test_udp(int family)
> @@ -185,6 +191,11 @@ void test_setget_sockopt(void)
> if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel->links.socket_post_create, "attach_cgroup"))
> goto done;
>
> + skel->links.tcp_setsockopt =
> + bpf_program__attach_cgroup(skel->progs.tcp_setsockopt, cg_fd);
> + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel->links.tcp_setsockopt, "attach_setsockopt"))
> + goto done;
> +
> test_tcp(AF_INET6);
> test_tcp(AF_INET);
> test_udp(AF_INET6);
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/setget_sockopt.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/setget_sockopt.c
> index 60518aed1ffc..920af9e21e84 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/setget_sockopt.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/setget_sockopt.c
> @@ -20,6 +20,8 @@ int nr_connect;
> int nr_binddev;
> int nr_socket_post_create;
> int nr_fin_wait1;
> +int nr_state;
> +int nr_setsockopt;
>
> struct sockopt_test {
> int opt;
> @@ -59,6 +61,8 @@ static const struct sockopt_test sol_tcp_tests[] = {
> { .opt = TCP_THIN_LINEAR_TIMEOUTS, .flip = 1, },
> { .opt = TCP_USER_TIMEOUT, .new = 123400, .expected = 123400, },
> { .opt = TCP_NOTSENT_LOWAT, .new = 1314, .expected = 1314, },
> + { .opt = TCP_BPF_SOCK_OPS_CB_FLAGS, .new = BPF_SOCK_OPS_ALL_CB_FLAGS,
> + .expected = BPF_SOCK_OPS_ALL_CB_FLAGS, .restore = BPF_SOCK_OPS_STATE_CB_FLAG, },
> { .opt = 0, },
> };
>
> @@ -124,6 +128,7 @@ static int bpf_test_sockopt_int(void *ctx, struct sock *sk,
>
> if (bpf_setsockopt(ctx, level, opt, &new, sizeof(new)))
> return 1;
> +
> if (bpf_getsockopt(ctx, level, opt, &tmp, sizeof(tmp)) ||
> tmp != expected)
> return 1;
> @@ -384,11 +389,14 @@ int skops_sockopt(struct bpf_sock_ops *skops)
> nr_passive += !(bpf_test_sockopt(skops, sk) ||
> test_tcp_maxseg(skops, sk) ||
> test_tcp_saved_syn(skops, sk));
> - bpf_sock_ops_cb_flags_set(skops,
> - skops->bpf_sock_ops_cb_flags |
> - BPF_SOCK_OPS_STATE_CB_FLAG);
> +
> + /* no need to set sockops cb flags here as sockopt
> + * tests and user-space originated setsockopt() will
> + * set flags to include BPF_SOCK_OPS_STATE_CB.
> + */

I don't think the "user-space originated..." comment is accruate here. The
user-space originated setsockopt() from the above test_tcp() won't affect the
passively established sk here. This took me a while to digest...

iiuc, the removed bpf_sock_ops_cb_flags_set() for the passive connection is now
implicitly done (and hidden) in the newly added sol_tcp_tests[].restore.

How about keeping the explicit bpf_sock_ops_cb_flags_set() and removing the
".restore".

The existing bpf_sock_ops_cb_flags_set() can be changed to
bpf_setsockopt(TCP_BPF_SOCK_OPS_CB_FLAGS) if it helps to test if it is effective.

> break;
> case BPF_SOCK_OPS_STATE_CB:
> + nr_state++;

How about removing the nr_state addition and adding a SEC("cgroup/getsockopt")
bpf prog to test the getsockopt(TCP_BPF_SOCK_OPS_CB_FLAGS).

Create another test_nonstandard_opt() in prog_tests/setget_sockopt.c and
separate it from the existing test_{tcp, udp...} which is mainly exercising
set/getsockopt(sol_*_tests[]) on different hooks (right now it has
lsm_cgroup/socket_post_create and sockops). It doesn't fit testing the user
syscall set/getsockopt on the nonstandard_opt.