From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-187.mta0.migadu.com (out-187.mta0.migadu.com [91.218.175.187]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E4A920127D for ; Wed, 8 Jan 2025 20:28:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.187 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736368112; cv=none; b=Oyh7RbOkBFTwYPSQncrzPHkenmTAzf0NtlkHuObpCMGTrS+4VIfWsx6D/HxJ3jHQcqW14qv1RB6a9Zf/7B+dgh6HLPO+XWgucVme/CKz1Mlj2uTvSRUHwuNiNG61LaGPwqstX6ov1SeH5o1WXQlTV2MMT/kxJ2ct/6xDguuQnpw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1736368112; c=relaxed/simple; bh=4mNVQBxEaE3fZIFuHb/xYVT7Vk/Ya7y5IdK5A3iVZeU=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=QvGaDXKzv1JnaeaZtWtUad4bPSriJTQ6ggoOcnrGbejtCDOFtQPWlyIGqz1thYXKnCUAHjw6Kc95Iza6m1G4IZrOGH8WUhmLG+mptTrSKJ//ny2mZNZaS2vy6S8HqGxoCjShz8SnDEkayNUNAo7HiyXJsrQi4lN0f0lp8TqEywE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=TCqYsdWM; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.187 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="TCqYsdWM" Message-ID: <93955687-a82b-4365-931c-d53ecd1dacd7@linux.dev> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1736368103; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=mG3i4oEN3GwQ2iVcDpe1ei6y/mwBbh+jaJPTaZeG+Z4=; b=TCqYsdWM7pGPhhOE44WwwGIyQIbRwqiPFj4gDlcpFIH918kW8lHfzr5dc2AYekNTd3eVpX ulxAS6YA7CJc+iVyhJ7Z4GxcEYBOvTVJOxkai14fshkePEl2IaHagDrNd3I4B8YstwUE2C /29VhmcTZAvtiKduwzVG/oupMqlo8vg= Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2025 12:28:09 -0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Compiler support for BPF at LSFMMBPF 2025 - Is there interest? To: "Jose E. Marchesi" , bpf@vger.kernel.org Cc: elena.zannoni@oracle.com References: <87ikqpmf81.fsf@oracle.com> Content-Language: en-GB X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Yonghong Song In-Reply-To: <87ikqpmf81.fsf@oracle.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT On 1/8/25 8:40 AM, Jose E. Marchesi wrote: > Hello people. > > The deadline is approaching and we were wondering, should we prepare a > proposal for a discussion around BPF support in both GCC and clang for > LSFMMBPF? Like in previous years, we could do a recap of the on-going > work and where we stand, and discuss and clarify particular issues. Thanks. Indeed this is a good topic to discuss w.r.t. clang/gcc related issues.