public inbox for bpf@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: KaFai Wan <kafai.wan@linux.dev>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
	martin.lau@linux.dev,  eddyz87@gmail.com, song@kernel.org,
	yonghong.song@linux.dev,  john.fastabend@gmail.com,
	kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me, haoluo@google.com,
	 jolsa@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org, toke@redhat.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,  bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Le Chen <tom2cat@sjtu.edu.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf 1/2] bpf: Avoid RCU context warning when unpinning htab with internal structs
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2025 09:25:54 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9671e39c68dd45736dcd1547baba9616e6a07ed2.camel@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEf4BzZhGEgW82gweZtW1Cp5L1_pafUwML8jMifBvjzBtnWWeA@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, 2025-10-06 at 16:58 -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 3, 2025 at 1:47 AM KaFai Wan <kafai.wan@linux.dev> wrote:
> > 
> > When unpinning a BPF hash table (htab or htab_lru) that contains internal
> > structures (timer, workqueue, or task_work) in its values, a BUG warning
> > is triggered:
> >  BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at
> > kernel/bpf/hashtab.c:244
> >  in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 14, name:
> > ksoftirqd/0
> >  ...
> > 
> > The issue arises from the interaction between BPF object unpinning and
> > RCU callback mechanisms:
> > 1. BPF object unpinning uses ->free_inode() which schedules cleanup via
> >    call_rcu(), deferring the actual freeing to an RCU callback that
> >    executes within the RCU_SOFTIRQ context.
> > 2. During cleanup of hash tables containing internal structures,
> >    htab_map_free_internal_structs() is invoked, which includes
> >    cond_resched() or cond_resched_rcu() calls to yield the CPU during
> >    potentially long operations.
> > 
> > However, cond_resched() or cond_resched_rcu() cannot be safely called from
> > atomic RCU softirq context, leading to the BUG warning when attempting
> > to reschedule.
> > 
> > Fix this by changing from ->free_inode() to ->destroy_inode() for BPF
> > objects (prog, map, link). This allows direct inode freeing without
> > RCU callback scheduling, avoiding the invalid context warning.
> > 
> > Reported-by: Le Chen <tom2cat@sjtu.edu.cn>
> > Closes:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/1444123482.1827743.1750996347470.JavaMail.zimbra@sjtu.edu.cn/
> > Fixes: 68134668c17f ("bpf: Add map side support for bpf timers.")
> > Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: KaFai Wan <kafai.wan@linux.dev>
> > ---
> >  kernel/bpf/inode.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/bpf/inode.c b/kernel/bpf/inode.c
> > index f90bdcc0a047..65c2a71d7de1 100644
> > --- a/kernel/bpf/inode.c
> > +++ b/kernel/bpf/inode.c
> > @@ -790,7 +790,7 @@ const struct super_operations bpf_super_ops = {
> >         .statfs         = simple_statfs,
> >         .drop_inode     = inode_just_drop,
> >         .show_options   = bpf_show_options,
> > -       .free_inode     = bpf_free_inode,
> > +       .destroy_inode  = bpf_free_inode,
> 
> s/bpf_free_inode/bpf_destroy_inode/ then?
ok, done in v2.
> 
> >  };
> > 
> >  enum {
> > --
> > 2.43.0
> > 

-- 
Thanks,
KaFai

  reply	other threads:[~2025-10-07  1:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-03  8:45 [PATCH bpf 0/2] bpf: Avoid RCU context warning when unpinning htab with internal structs KaFai Wan
2025-10-03  8:45 ` [PATCH bpf 1/2] " KaFai Wan
2025-10-06 23:58   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-10-07  1:25     ` KaFai Wan [this message]
2025-10-03  8:45 ` [PATCH bpf 2/2] selftests/bpf: Add test for unpinning htab with internal timer struct KaFai Wan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9671e39c68dd45736dcd1547baba9616e6a07ed2.camel@linux.dev \
    --to=kafai.wan@linux.dev \
    --cc=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=toke@redhat.com \
    --cc=tom2cat@sjtu.edu.cn \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox