BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>
To: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
Cc: andrii@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	daniel@iogearbox.net, davem@davemloft.net, dsahern@kernel.org,
	edumazet@google.com, haoluo@google.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
	jolsa@kernel.org, kpsingh@kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org,
	kuni1840@gmail.com, mykolal@fb.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	pabeni@redhat.com, sdf@google.com, song@kernel.org,
	yonghong.song@linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 bpf-next 10/11] bpf: tcp: Support arbitrary SYN Cookie.
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2023 15:04:38 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <96afef48-a729-4947-9672-d63627a43cb0@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231123003154.56710-1-kuniyu@amazon.com>

On 11/22/23 4:31 PM, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
> From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>
> Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 15:19:29 -0800
>> On 11/21/23 10:42 AM, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
>>> diff --git a/include/net/inet6_hashtables.h b/include/net/inet6_hashtables.h
>>> index 533a7337865a..9a67f47a5e64 100644
>>> --- a/include/net/inet6_hashtables.h
>>> +++ b/include/net/inet6_hashtables.h
>>> @@ -116,9 +116,23 @@ struct sock *inet6_steal_sock(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb, int doff,
>>>    	if (!sk)
>>>    		return NULL;
>>>    
>>> -	if (!prefetched || !sk_fullsock(sk))
>>> +	if (!prefetched)
>>>    		return sk;
>>>    
>>> +	if (sk->sk_state == TCP_NEW_SYN_RECV) {
>>> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SYN_COOKIE)
>>> +		if (inet_reqsk(sk)->syncookie) {
>>> +			*refcounted = false;
>>> +			skb->sk = sk;
>>> +			skb->destructor = sock_pfree;
>>
>> Instead of re-init the skb->sk and skb->destructor, can skb_steal_sock() avoid
>> resetting them to NULL in the first place and skb_steal_sock() returns the
>> rsk_listener instead?
> 
> Yes, but we need to move skb_steal_sock() to request_sock.h or include it just

Moving it seems better than including a header in the middle. Not sure if 
inet_sock.h or request_sock.h is a better target.


> before skb_steal_sock() in sock.h like below.  When I include request_sock.h in
> top of sock.h, there were many build errors.



  reply	other threads:[~2023-11-27 23:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-21 18:42 [PATCH v3 bpf-next 00/11] bpf: tcp: Support arbitrary SYN Cookie at TC Kuniyuki Iwashima
2023-11-21 18:42 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 01/11] tcp: Clean up reverse xmas tree in cookie_v[46]_check() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2023-11-21 18:42 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 02/11] tcp: Cache sock_net(sk) " Kuniyuki Iwashima
2023-11-22 14:23   ` Eric Dumazet
2023-11-22 18:38     ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2023-11-21 18:42 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 03/11] tcp: Clean up goto labels " Kuniyuki Iwashima
2023-11-21 18:42 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 04/11] tcp: Don't pass cookie to __cookie_v[46]_check() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2023-11-21 18:42 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 05/11] tcp: Don't initialise tp->tsoffset in tcp_get_cookie_sock() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2023-11-21 18:42 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 06/11] tcp: Move TCP-AO bits from cookie_v[46]_check() to tcp_ao_syncookie() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2023-11-21 18:42 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 07/11] tcp: Factorise cookie req initialisation Kuniyuki Iwashima
2023-11-21 18:42 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 08/11] tcp: Factorise non-BPF SYN Cookie handling Kuniyuki Iwashima
2023-11-21 18:42 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 09/11] bpf: tcp: Handle BPF SYN Cookie in cookie_v[46]_check() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2023-11-21 18:42 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 10/11] bpf: tcp: Support arbitrary SYN Cookie Kuniyuki Iwashima
2023-11-22 23:19   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-11-23  0:31     ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2023-11-27 23:04       ` Martin KaFai Lau [this message]
2023-11-21 19:01 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 11/11] selftest: bpf: Test bpf_sk_assign_tcp_reqsk() Kuniyuki Iwashima
2023-11-23  8:52   ` kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=96afef48-a729-4947-9672-d63627a43cb0@linux.dev \
    --to=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuni1840@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuniyu@amazon.com \
    --cc=mykolal@fb.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sdf@google.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox