BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Geliang Tang <geliang@kernel.org>
To: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>,
	John Fastabend	 <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	 Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org,  bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] bpf, sockmap: Fix self-redirect copied_seq double-counting
Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2026 18:19:28 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9857cc27cd1c5bb8778141263fd79b29298fe24a.camel@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <949b0983-4491-474f-b105-5a69925dab69@linux.dev>

Hi Jiayuan,

On Mon, 2026-09-07 at 09:34 +0800, Jiayuan Chen wrote:
> 
> On 9/5/26 3:03 PM, Geliang Tang wrote:
> > From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
> > 
> > When a BPF stream_verdict program redirects an skb back to the same
> > socket (self-redirect with BPF_F_INGRESS), sk_psock_verdict_apply()
> > calls tcp_eat_skb() which advances tcp_sk->copied_seq. However, the
> > skb is then delivered to the socket's psock ingress queue and later
> > read by tcp_bpf_recvmsg_parser(), which also advances copied_seq
> > via
> > the copied_from_self accounting path. This double-counting causes
> > copied_seq to advance by 2x the actual data length, triggering:
> > 
> >    TCP recvmsg seq # bug 2: copied BF2E806, seq BF2E7FD, \
> > 			   rcvnxt BF2E806, fl 0
> >    WARNING: net/ipv4/tcp.c:2745 at tcp_recvmsg_locked+0x72b/0x2640
> >    Call Trace:
> >     tcp_recvmsg+0x10a/0x500
> >     sock_recvmsg+0x168/0x1d0
> >     __sys_recvfrom+0x19a/0x2a0
> >     __x64_sys_recvfrom+0xe4/0x1f0
> >     do_syscall_64+0xf7/0x530
> >     entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
> > 
> >    cleanup rbuf bug: copied BF2E806 seq BF2E806 rcvnxt BF2E806
> >    WARNING: net/ipv4/tcp.c:1609 at tcp_cleanup_rbuf+0xf2/0x1c0
> >    Call Trace:
> >     tcp_recvmsg_locked+0x8d1/0x2640
> >     tcp_recvmsg+0x10a/0x500
> >     sock_recvmsg+0x168/0x1d0
> >     __sys_recvfrom+0x19a/0x2a0
> >     __x64_sys_recvfrom+0xe4/0x1f0
> >     do_syscall_64+0xf7/0x530
> >     entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
> > 
> > Fix this by converting self-redirect verdict to __SK_PASS at the
> > beginning of sk_psock_verdict_apply(). This bypasses the
> > __SK_REDIRECT case entirely (which calls sk_psock_eat_skb), letting
> > the __SK_PASS path queue the skb to the psock ingress queue. The
> > data is then read via tcp_bpf_recvmsg_parser(), which advances
> > copied_seq exactly once through copied_from_self. Cross-socket
> > redirects continue through __SK_REDIRECT with sk_psock_eat_skb()
> > unchanged.
> > 
> > Fixes: e5c6de5fa025 ("bpf, sockmap: Incorrectly handling
> > copied_seq")
> > Suggested-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
> > Suggested-by: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>
> > Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
> > ---
> > v2:
> >   - fixup the verdict as Jakub and Jiayuan suggested.
> > 
> > v1:
> >   -
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/b840c35fdfdf36e9fddedfa645b12699bc51aa34.1787968065.git.tanggeliang@kylinos.cn/
> > ---
> >   net/core/skmsg.c | 4 ++++
> >   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/net/core/skmsg.c b/net/core/skmsg.c
> > index 2521b643fa05..df385a5a961e 100644
> > --- a/net/core/skmsg.c
> > +++ b/net/core/skmsg.c
> > @@ -1000,6 +1000,10 @@ static int sk_psock_verdict_apply(struct
> > sk_psock *psock, struct sk_buff *skb,
> >   	int err = 0;
> >   	u32 len, off;
> >   
> > +	if (verdict == __SK_REDIRECT && skb_bpf_ingress(skb) &&
> > +	    skb_bpf_redirect_fetch(skb) == psock->sk)
> > +		verdict = __SK_PASS;
> > +
> >   	switch (verdict) {
> >   	case __SK_PASS:
> >   		err = -EIO;
> 
> 
> LGTM.
> 
> Please target to bpf tree so that BPF CI cat capature it.

Sorry, I forgot to add the prefix. It's been a while since I last sent
a patch to the bpf mailing list. Just to confirm, I should use [PATCH
bpf] instead of [PATCH bpf-next] for this fix, correct?

Thanks,
-Geliang

> 
> 
> Thanks
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-07 10:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-05  7:03 [PATCH v2] bpf, sockmap: Fix self-redirect copied_seq double-counting Geliang Tang
2026-09-07  1:34 ` Jiayuan Chen
2026-09-07 10:19   ` Geliang Tang [this message]
2026-09-07 10:52     ` Jiayuan Chen
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-09-09 15:06 netdev-bot+sashiko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9857cc27cd1c5bb8778141263fd79b29298fe24a.camel@kernel.org \
    --to=geliang@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=jakub@cloudflare.com \
    --cc=jiayuan.chen@linux.dev \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=tanggeliang@kylinos.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox