From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-174.mta0.migadu.com (out-174.mta0.migadu.com [91.218.175.174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 294EB18D636 for ; Sat, 4 Jul 2026 03:24:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.174 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783135454; cv=none; b=VrvwUbRvbMsyGK49w1gN9p8dq3PXSAjqtj61E9z0MjPIKHWa80FvgVHCvLXLzYw5pTrYXZZ6UsOe7wiT2sZH3dskJ7KTn/2w+atbeUOcm4A+wxQaEdvnuxz47/gqSMJy0vaNXZMvB/dBTDLE2NMRGv7SMqcGuRTw74T62unCSss= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1783135454; c=relaxed/simple; bh=+24Q2zCWN/HvGIHWklPeR2Z7HtwviKizhy/sQbZHZhc=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=GKhdALlQ4amQMCEwPOQ9P2HYiyg2og4ngQcywuYEPC8N2VrALseD4bccwg6AYAIqVhbHNsFQCbk5/AkFVPThamYI1VZfOuP3Cnd2oG2l4hBlCH8CT6igcT2a7Ok7+cINPpWUfoYydgGGj6MwXWxJbyUVlZ73gjrUJckz7u2bPY4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=pBHfhdLl; arc=none smtp.client-ip=91.218.175.174 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="pBHfhdLl" Message-ID: <99fe15729f88182002d4d034e12048a2a02925cf.camel@linux.dev> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1783135438; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=+24Q2zCWN/HvGIHWklPeR2Z7HtwviKizhy/sQbZHZhc=; b=pBHfhdLljH5NS+CkPDaMpqgZ9tbZJ9h9MmsSlTLyD8n4uAmrCHvRh7hDztlnUwF+//F+h2 JgpDBb0SBArwaKX2jgph+Grr6wHsLe8betAnJYoBT8BA78ZjimWD2Tnr8jVH0HEHaI50As DYGwtfIPEWkRasLw5pPF5RGv7nObVGc= Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v7 1/2] bpf: Introduce jit_required flag and refactor kfunc path X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: KaFai Wan To: Tiezhu Yang , sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2026 11:23:52 +0800 In-Reply-To: <7d326e51-976c-2962-aa01-a545e2f64259@loongson.cn> References: <20260702143656.28845-1-yangtiezhu@loongson.cn> <20260702143656.28845-2-yangtiezhu@loongson.cn> <20260702145855.07C6B1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> <7cce1695-eaa2-816b-2877-9cb2f117aa27@loongson.cn> <4a0ac2692d2a76ab0479c2bf20dbf26a17636d67.camel@linux.dev> <7d326e51-976c-2962-aa01-a545e2f64259@loongson.cn> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT On Fri, 2026-07-03 at 23:56 +0800, Tiezhu Yang wrote: > On 7/3/26 21:51, KaFai Wan wrote: > >=20 > > Was it tested after compiling together with patch #2? seems patch #2 wo= rks. >=20 > Yes. >=20 > >=20 works as expected. --=20 Thanks, KaFai