BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: Hao Sun <sunhao.th@gmail.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, andreimatei1@gmail.com, ast@kernel.org,
	 andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf] bpf: Reject pointer spill with var offset
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 15:05:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9a39fe710042c71abb252a38e1ec1bbfbe291e52.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACkBjsZjYewSh4ZHFbj-D_Z7kGOeaVLfROcEDE1beNEDn-aU-A@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, 2024-01-25 at 09:34 +0100, Hao Sun wrote:
[...]
> Testing this case with test_progs/test_verifier is hard because it happens
> when cpu_mitigations_off() is true, but we do not have this setup yet.
> So the mentioned prog is rejected by sanitize_check_bounds() due to ptr
> alu with var_off when adding it to test_progs, and loading as unpriv.
> 
> My local test was conducted: (1) booting the kernel with "mitigations=off"
> so that bypass_spec_v1 is true and sanitize_check_bounds() is skipped;
> (2) running the prog without the patch leaks the pointer; (3) loading the
> prog with the patch applied resulting in the expected message.

Thank you for explaining.
I booted VM with "mitigations=off" and tried test as in [1], it passes.

Tested-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>

[1] https://gist.github.com/eddyz87/bb517437767a8f01891cc6e6a847d448

      reply	other threads:[~2024-01-25 13:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-24 10:30 [PATCH bpf] bpf: Reject pointer spill with var offset Hao Sun
2024-01-25  1:35 ` Eduard Zingerman
2024-01-25  8:34   ` Hao Sun
2024-01-25 13:05     ` Eduard Zingerman [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9a39fe710042c71abb252a38e1ec1bbfbe291e52.camel@gmail.com \
    --to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=andreimatei1@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sunhao.th@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox