BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org,  daniel@iogearbox.net,
	martin.lau@kernel.org
Cc: kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 bpf-next 0/9] Libbpf-side __arg_ctx fallback support
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2024 04:33:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9ab7a6d993ce28a65b3204515f7b370b41f2fa0e.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240104013847.3875810-1-andrii@kernel.org>

On Wed, 2024-01-03 at 17:38 -0800, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> Support __arg_ctx global function argument tag semantics even on older kernels
> that don't natively support it through btf_decl_tag("arg:ctx").
> 
> Patches #2-#6 are preparatory work to allow to postpone BTF loading into the
> kernel until after all the BPF program relocations (including global func
> appending to main programs) are done. Patch #4 is perhaps the most important
> and establishes pre-created stable placeholder FDs, so that relocations can
> embed valid map FDs into ldimm64 instructions.
> 
> Once BTF is done after relocation, what's left is to adjust BTF information to
> have each main program's copy of each used global subprog to point to its own
> adjusted FUNC -> FUNC_PROTO type chain (if they use __arg_ctx) in such a way
> as to satisfy type expectations of BPF verifier regarding the PTR_TO_CTX
> argument definition. See patch #8 for details.
> 
> Patch #8 adds few more __arg_ctx use cases (edge cases like multiple arguments
> having __arg_ctx, etc) to test_global_func_ctx_args.c, to make it simple to
> validate that this logic indeed works on old kernels. It does. But just to be
> 100% sure patch #9 adds a test validating that libbpf uploads func_info with
> properly modified BTF data.
> 
> v2->v3:
>   - drop renaming patch (Alexei, Eduard);
>   - use memfd_create() instead of /dev/null for placeholder FD (Eduard);
>   - add one more test for validating BTF rewrite logic (Eduard);
>   - fixed wrong -errno usage, reshuffled some BTF rewrite bits (Eduard);
> v1->v2:
>   - do internal functions renaming in patch #1 (Alexei);
>   - extract cloning of FUNC -> FUNC_PROTO information into separate function
>     (Alexei);

Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>

Thank you for adding the test in patch #9.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-01-04  2:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-04  1:38 [PATCH v3 bpf-next 0/9] Libbpf-side __arg_ctx fallback support Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-04  1:38 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 1/9] libbpf: make uniform use of btf__fd() accessor inside libbpf Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-04  1:38 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 2/9] libbpf: use explicit map reuse flag to skip map creation steps Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-04  1:38 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 3/9] libbpf: don't rely on map->fd as an indicator of map being created Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-04  1:38 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 4/9] libbpf: use stable map placeholder FDs Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-04  1:38 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 5/9] libbpf: move exception callbacks assignment logic into relocation step Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-04  1:38 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 6/9] libbpf: move BTF loading step after " Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-04  1:38 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 7/9] libbpf: implement __arg_ctx fallback logic Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-04  5:39   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-01-04 18:37     ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-04 18:52       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-01-04 20:58         ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-05  1:33           ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-01-05  3:57             ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-05  5:42               ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-01-08 23:45                 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-09  1:49                   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-01-09 17:17                     ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-10  1:58                       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-01-10 19:02                         ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-04  1:38 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 8/9] selftests/bpf: add arg:ctx cases to test_global_funcs tests Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-04  1:38 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 9/9] selftests/bpf: add __arg_ctx BTF rewrite test Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-04  2:33 ` Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2024-01-04  8:13 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 0/9] Libbpf-side __arg_ctx fallback support patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9ab7a6d993ce28a65b3204515f7b370b41f2fa0e.camel@gmail.com \
    --to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox