From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
martin.lau@kernel.org
Cc: kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 bpf-next 0/9] Libbpf-side __arg_ctx fallback support
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2024 04:33:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9ab7a6d993ce28a65b3204515f7b370b41f2fa0e.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240104013847.3875810-1-andrii@kernel.org>
On Wed, 2024-01-03 at 17:38 -0800, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> Support __arg_ctx global function argument tag semantics even on older kernels
> that don't natively support it through btf_decl_tag("arg:ctx").
>
> Patches #2-#6 are preparatory work to allow to postpone BTF loading into the
> kernel until after all the BPF program relocations (including global func
> appending to main programs) are done. Patch #4 is perhaps the most important
> and establishes pre-created stable placeholder FDs, so that relocations can
> embed valid map FDs into ldimm64 instructions.
>
> Once BTF is done after relocation, what's left is to adjust BTF information to
> have each main program's copy of each used global subprog to point to its own
> adjusted FUNC -> FUNC_PROTO type chain (if they use __arg_ctx) in such a way
> as to satisfy type expectations of BPF verifier regarding the PTR_TO_CTX
> argument definition. See patch #8 for details.
>
> Patch #8 adds few more __arg_ctx use cases (edge cases like multiple arguments
> having __arg_ctx, etc) to test_global_func_ctx_args.c, to make it simple to
> validate that this logic indeed works on old kernels. It does. But just to be
> 100% sure patch #9 adds a test validating that libbpf uploads func_info with
> properly modified BTF data.
>
> v2->v3:
> - drop renaming patch (Alexei, Eduard);
> - use memfd_create() instead of /dev/null for placeholder FD (Eduard);
> - add one more test for validating BTF rewrite logic (Eduard);
> - fixed wrong -errno usage, reshuffled some BTF rewrite bits (Eduard);
> v1->v2:
> - do internal functions renaming in patch #1 (Alexei);
> - extract cloning of FUNC -> FUNC_PROTO information into separate function
> (Alexei);
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Thank you for adding the test in patch #9.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-04 2:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-04 1:38 [PATCH v3 bpf-next 0/9] Libbpf-side __arg_ctx fallback support Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-04 1:38 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 1/9] libbpf: make uniform use of btf__fd() accessor inside libbpf Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-04 1:38 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 2/9] libbpf: use explicit map reuse flag to skip map creation steps Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-04 1:38 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 3/9] libbpf: don't rely on map->fd as an indicator of map being created Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-04 1:38 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 4/9] libbpf: use stable map placeholder FDs Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-04 1:38 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 5/9] libbpf: move exception callbacks assignment logic into relocation step Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-04 1:38 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 6/9] libbpf: move BTF loading step after " Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-04 1:38 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 7/9] libbpf: implement __arg_ctx fallback logic Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-04 5:39 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-01-04 18:37 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-04 18:52 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-01-04 20:58 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-05 1:33 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-01-05 3:57 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-05 5:42 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-01-08 23:45 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-09 1:49 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-01-09 17:17 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-10 1:58 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-01-10 19:02 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-04 1:38 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 8/9] selftests/bpf: add arg:ctx cases to test_global_funcs tests Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-04 1:38 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 9/9] selftests/bpf: add __arg_ctx BTF rewrite test Andrii Nakryiko
2024-01-04 2:33 ` Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2024-01-04 8:13 ` [PATCH v3 bpf-next 0/9] Libbpf-side __arg_ctx fallback support patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9ab7a6d993ce28a65b3204515f7b370b41f2fa0e.camel@gmail.com \
--to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox