BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
To: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"bpf@vger.kernel.org" <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"ast@kernel.org" <ast@kernel.org>,
	"daniel@iogearbox.net" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Martin Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/3] bpf: support cloning sk storage on accept()
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2019 23:03:39 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9bd56e49-c38d-e1c4-1ff3-8250531d0d48@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190807154720.260577-2-sdf@google.com>



On 8/7/19 8:47 AM, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> Add new helper bpf_sk_storage_clone which optionally clones sk storage
> and call it from bpf_sk_storage_clone. Reuse the gap in
> bpf_sk_storage_elem to store clone/non-clone flag.
> 
> Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>

I tried to see whether I can find any missing race conditions in
the code but I failed. So except a minor comments below,
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>

> ---
>   include/net/bpf_sk_storage.h |  10 ++++
>   include/uapi/linux/bpf.h     |   1 +
>   net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c    | 102 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>   net/core/sock.c              |   9 ++--
>   4 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/net/bpf_sk_storage.h b/include/net/bpf_sk_storage.h
> index b9dcb02e756b..8e4f831d2e52 100644
> --- a/include/net/bpf_sk_storage.h
> +++ b/include/net/bpf_sk_storage.h
> @@ -10,4 +10,14 @@ void bpf_sk_storage_free(struct sock *sk);
>   extern const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_sk_storage_get_proto;
>   extern const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_sk_storage_delete_proto;
>   
> +#ifdef CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL
> +int bpf_sk_storage_clone(const struct sock *sk, struct sock *newsk);
> +#else
> +static inline int bpf_sk_storage_clone(const struct sock *sk,
> +				       struct sock *newsk)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
>   #endif /* _BPF_SK_STORAGE_H */
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> index 4393bd4b2419..00459ca4c8cf 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> @@ -2931,6 +2931,7 @@ enum bpf_func_id {
>   
>   /* BPF_FUNC_sk_storage_get flags */
>   #define BPF_SK_STORAGE_GET_F_CREATE	(1ULL << 0)
> +#define BPF_SK_STORAGE_GET_F_CLONE	(1ULL << 1)
>   
>   /* Mode for BPF_FUNC_skb_adjust_room helper. */
>   enum bpf_adj_room_mode {
> diff --git a/net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c b/net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c
> index 94c7f77ecb6b..b6dea67965bc 100644
> --- a/net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c
> +++ b/net/core/bpf_sk_storage.c
> @@ -12,6 +12,9 @@
>   
>   static atomic_t cache_idx;
>   
> +#define BPF_SK_STORAGE_GET_F_MASK	(BPF_SK_STORAGE_GET_F_CREATE | \
> +					 BPF_SK_STORAGE_GET_F_CLONE)
> +
>   struct bucket {
>   	struct hlist_head list;
>   	raw_spinlock_t lock;
> @@ -66,7 +69,8 @@ struct bpf_sk_storage_elem {
>   	struct hlist_node snode;	/* Linked to bpf_sk_storage */
>   	struct bpf_sk_storage __rcu *sk_storage;
>   	struct rcu_head rcu;
> -	/* 8 bytes hole */
> +	u8 clone:1;
> +	/* 7 bytes hole */
>   	/* The data is stored in aother cacheline to minimize
>   	 * the number of cachelines access during a cache hit.
>   	 */
> @@ -509,7 +513,7 @@ static int sk_storage_delete(struct sock *sk, struct bpf_map *map)
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> -/* Called by __sk_destruct() */
> +/* Called by __sk_destruct() & bpf_sk_storage_clone() */
>   void bpf_sk_storage_free(struct sock *sk)
>   {
>   	struct bpf_sk_storage_elem *selem;
> @@ -739,19 +743,106 @@ static int bpf_fd_sk_storage_delete_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key)
>   	return err;
>   }
>   
> +static struct bpf_sk_storage_elem *
> +bpf_sk_storage_clone_elem(struct sock *newsk,
> +			  struct bpf_sk_storage_map *smap,
> +			  struct bpf_sk_storage_elem *selem)
> +{
> +	struct bpf_sk_storage_elem *copy_selem;
> +
> +	copy_selem = selem_alloc(smap, newsk, NULL, true);
> +	if (!copy_selem)
> +		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +
> +	if (map_value_has_spin_lock(&smap->map))
> +		copy_map_value_locked(&smap->map, SDATA(copy_selem)->data,
> +				      SDATA(selem)->data, true);
> +	else
> +		copy_map_value(&smap->map, SDATA(copy_selem)->data,
> +			       SDATA(selem)->data);
> +
> +	return copy_selem;
> +}
> +
> +int bpf_sk_storage_clone(const struct sock *sk, struct sock *newsk)
> +{
> +	struct bpf_sk_storage *new_sk_storage = NULL;
> +	struct bpf_sk_storage *sk_storage;
> +	struct bpf_sk_storage_elem *selem;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	RCU_INIT_POINTER(newsk->sk_bpf_storage, NULL);
> +
> +	rcu_read_lock();
> +	sk_storage = rcu_dereference(sk->sk_bpf_storage);
> +
> +	if (!sk_storage || hlist_empty(&sk_storage->list))
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(selem, &sk_storage->list, snode) {
> +		struct bpf_sk_storage_map *smap;
> +		struct bpf_sk_storage_elem *copy_selem;
> +
> +		if (!selem->clone)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		smap = rcu_dereference(SDATA(selem)->smap);
> +		if (!smap)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		copy_selem = bpf_sk_storage_clone_elem(newsk, smap, selem);
> +		if (IS_ERR(copy_selem)) {
> +			ret = PTR_ERR(copy_selem);
> +			goto err;
> +		}
> +
> +		if (!new_sk_storage) {
> +			ret = sk_storage_alloc(newsk, smap, copy_selem);
> +			if (ret) {
> +				kfree(copy_selem);
> +				atomic_sub(smap->elem_size,
> +					   &newsk->sk_omem_alloc);
> +				goto err;
> +			}
> +
> +			new_sk_storage = rcu_dereference(copy_selem->sk_storage);
> +			continue;
> +		}
> +
> +		raw_spin_lock_bh(&new_sk_storage->lock);
> +		selem_link_map(smap, copy_selem);
> +		__selem_link_sk(new_sk_storage, copy_selem);
> +		raw_spin_unlock_bh(&new_sk_storage->lock);

Considering in this particular case, new socket is not visible to 
outside world yet (both kernel and user space), map_delete/map_update
operations are not applicable in this situation, so
the above raw_spin_lock_bh() probably not needed.


> +	}
> +
> +out:
> +	rcu_read_unlock();
> +	return 0;
> +
> +err:
> +	rcu_read_unlock();
> +
> +	bpf_sk_storage_free(newsk);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
>   BPF_CALL_4(bpf_sk_storage_get, struct bpf_map *, map, struct sock *, sk,
>   	   void *, value, u64, flags)
>   {
>   	struct bpf_sk_storage_data *sdata;
>   
> -	if (flags > BPF_SK_STORAGE_GET_F_CREATE)
> +	if (flags & ~BPF_SK_STORAGE_GET_F_MASK)
> +		return (unsigned long)NULL;
> +
> +	if ((flags & BPF_SK_STORAGE_GET_F_CLONE) &&
> +	    !(flags & BPF_SK_STORAGE_GET_F_CREATE))
>   		return (unsigned long)NULL;
>   
>   	sdata = sk_storage_lookup(sk, map, true);
>   	if (sdata)
>   		return (unsigned long)sdata->data;
>   
> -	if (flags == BPF_SK_STORAGE_GET_F_CREATE &&
> +	if ((flags & BPF_SK_STORAGE_GET_F_CREATE) &&
>   	    /* Cannot add new elem to a going away sk.
>   	     * Otherwise, the new elem may become a leak
>   	     * (and also other memory issues during map
> @@ -762,6 +853,9 @@ BPF_CALL_4(bpf_sk_storage_get, struct bpf_map *, map, struct sock *, sk,
>   		/* sk must be a fullsock (guaranteed by verifier),
>   		 * so sock_gen_put() is unnecessary.
>   		 */
> +		if (!IS_ERR(sdata))
> +			SELEM(sdata)->clone =
> +				!!(flags & BPF_SK_STORAGE_GET_F_CLONE);
>   		sock_put(sk);
>   		return IS_ERR(sdata) ?
>   			(unsigned long)NULL : (unsigned long)sdata->data;
> diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
> index d57b0cc995a0..f5e801a9cea4 100644
> --- a/net/core/sock.c
> +++ b/net/core/sock.c
> @@ -1851,9 +1851,12 @@ struct sock *sk_clone_lock(const struct sock *sk, const gfp_t priority)
>   			goto out;
>   		}
>   		RCU_INIT_POINTER(newsk->sk_reuseport_cb, NULL);
> -#ifdef CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL
> -		RCU_INIT_POINTER(newsk->sk_bpf_storage, NULL);
> -#endif
> +
> +		if (bpf_sk_storage_clone(sk, newsk)) {
> +			sk_free_unlock_clone(newsk);
> +			newsk = NULL;
> +			goto out;
> +		}
>   
>   		newsk->sk_err	   = 0;
>   		newsk->sk_err_soft = 0;
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-07 23:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-07 15:47 [PATCH bpf-next 0/3] bpf: support cloning sk storage on accept() Stanislav Fomichev
2019-08-07 15:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/3] " Stanislav Fomichev
2019-08-07 23:03   ` Yonghong Song [this message]
2019-08-08  0:05     ` Stanislav Fomichev
2019-08-08  0:18       ` Yonghong Song
2019-08-08  7:11       ` Martin Lau
2019-08-08  6:39   ` Martin Lau
2019-08-08 15:28     ` Stanislav Fomichev
2019-08-08 18:27       ` Martin Lau
2019-08-07 15:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/3] bpf: sync bpf.h to tools/ Stanislav Fomichev
2019-08-07 23:04   ` Yonghong Song
2019-08-07 15:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/3] selftests/bpf: add sockopt clone/inheritance test Stanislav Fomichev
2019-08-07 23:14   ` Yonghong Song
2019-08-08  0:08     ` Stanislav Fomichev

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9bd56e49-c38d-e1c4-1ff3-8250531d0d48@fb.com \
    --to=yhs@fb.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sdf@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox