BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Zavaritsky <mejedi@gmail.com>
To: Anton Protopopov <aspsk@isovalent.com>
Cc: Charalampos Stylianopoulos <charalampos.stylianopoulos@gmail.com>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	aspsk2@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/4] expose number of map entries to userspace
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2025 18:52:38 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <AC7968EC-73CA-415B-8FAD-70C805075479@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z4ke1A1agEko41v8@eis>


> On 16. Jan 2025, at 15:59, Anton Protopopov <aspsk@isovalent.com> wrote:
> 
> On 25/01/14 12:38PM, Nick Zavaritsky wrote:
>> 
>>> On 9. Jan 2025, at 18:37, Anton Protopopov <aspsk@isovalent.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On 25/01/07 12:10PM, Charalampos Stylianopoulos wrote:
>>>> (sorry for double posting, this time in plain text)
>>>> Thanks a lot for the feedback!
>>>> 
>>>> So, to double check, the suggestion is to only extend the libbpf API
>>>> with a new helper that does pretty much what get_cur_elements() does
>>>> in tools/testing/selftests/bpf/map_tests/map_percpu_stats.c ?
>>> 
>>> What is your use case for getting the number of elements in a
>>> particular map? Will it work for you to just use a variant of
>>> get_cur_elements() from selftests vs. adding new API to libbpf?
>> 
>> (On behalf of Charalampos Stylianopoulos) we would like to get the
>> number of elements in some maps for monitoring purposes. The end goal is
>> to get someone paged when a fixed-capacity map is about to start
>> rejecting inserts.
>> 
>> We aim to operate a large number of apps in containers (custom packet
>> processing services, telekom). We find it most convenient for an app
>> itself to expose metrics concerning the maps it has created.
>> 
>> We currently use a map iterator and a bunch of bpf_probe_read_kernel. We
>> foresee the number of maps in our systems getting significantly higher
>> in the near future. Therefore enumerating every map in the system to get
>> a number of elements in a particular map doesn't look sustainable.
>> 
>> How do you feel about introducing bpf_map_sum_elem_count_by_fd kfunc,
>> available in syscall programs?
> 
> This should work already, something like
> 
>    __s64 bpf_map_sum_elem_count(const struct bpf_map *map) __ksym;
>    __s64 ret_user;
> 
>    struct {
>            __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH);
>            __type(key, int);
>            __type(value, int);
>            __uint(max_entries, 4);
>    } your_map SEC(".maps");
> 
>    SEC("syscall")
>    int sum(void *ctx)
>    {
>            struct bpf_map *map = (struct bpf_map *)&your_map;
> 
>            ret_user = bpf_map_sum_elem_count(map);
> 
>            return 0;
>    }
> 
>    char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
> 
> Is this sufficient for your use case?

Technically it works. One can add a program similar to the snippet below
to their bpf code to expose the number of elements in every map of
interest.

struct stats { __s64 a, b, c, d; };
SEC(“.maps”) struct { ... } a, b, c, d;

SEC(“syscall”)
int sum_element_count_bulk(void *ctx)
{
    struct stats *stats = ctx;
    stats->a = bpf_map_sum_element_count((void *)a);
    stats->b = bpf_map_sum_element_count((void *)b);
    ...
    return 0;
}

The downside is that it is boilerplate code that has to be written every
single time. With the proposed bpf_map_sum_element_count_by_fd, one can
have a library in user space that offers convenient
sum_element_count(int fd).

It could leverage the following bpf program behind the scenes:

SEC(“syscall”)
int sum_element_count(void *ctx)
{
    *(__s64 *)ctx = bpf_map_sum_element_count_by_fd(*(int *)ctx);
    return 0;
}

> 
>>> 
>>> [Also, please try not to top-post, see https://www.idallen.com/topposting.html]
>>> 
>>>>> On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 at 08:44, Anton Protopopov <aspsk@isovalent.com> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 25/01/06 05:19PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>>>>>>> On 1/6/25 3:53 PM, Charalampos Stylianopoulos wrote:
>>>>>>>> This patch series provides an easy way for userspace applications to
>>>>>>>> query the number of entries currently present in a map.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Currently, the number of entries in a map is accessible only from kernel space
>>>>>>>> and eBPF programs. A userspace program that wants to track map utilization has to
>>>>>>>> create and attach an eBPF program solely for that purpose.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> This series makes the number of entries in a map easily accessible, by extending the
>>>>>>>> main bpf syscall with a new command. The command supports only maps that already
>>>>>>>> track utilization, namely hash maps, LPM maps and queue/stack maps.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> An earlier attempt to directly expose it to user space can be found here [0], which
>>>>>>> eventually led to [1] to only expose it via kfunc for BPF programs in order to avoid
>>>>>>> extending UAPI.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Perhaps instead add a small libbpf helper (e.g. bpf_map__current_entries to complement
>>>>>>> bpf_map__max_entries) which does all the work to extract that info via [1] underneath?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> One small thingy here is that bpf_map_sum_elem_count() is only
>>>>>> available from the map iterator. Which means that to get the
>>>>>> bpf_map_sum_elem_count() for one map only, one have to iterate
>>>>>> through the whole set of maps (and filter out all but one).
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I wanted to follow up my series by either adding the result of
>>>>>> calling bpf_map_sum_elem_count() to map_info as u32 or to add
>>>>>> possibility to provide a map_fd/map_id when creating an iterator
>>>>>> (so that it is only called for one map). But so far I haven't
>>>>>> a real use case for getting the number of elements for one map only.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Daniel
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> [0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230531110511.64612-1-aspsk@isovalent.com/
>>>>>>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230705160139.19967-1-aspsk@isovalent.com/
>>>>>>>     https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230719092952.41202-1-aspsk@isovalent.com/
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Charalampos Stylianopoulos (4):
>>>>>>>>  bpf: Add map_num_entries map op
>>>>>>>>  bpf: Add bpf command to get number of map entries
>>>>>>>>  libbpf: Add support for MAP_GET_NUM_ENTRIES command
>>>>>>>>  selftests/bpf: Add tests for bpf_map_get_num_entries
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> include/linux/bpf.h                           |  3 ++
>>>>>>>> include/linux/bpf_local_storage.h             |  1 +
>>>>>>>> include/uapi/linux/bpf.h                      | 17 +++++++++
>>>>>>>> kernel/bpf/devmap.c                           | 14 ++++++++
>>>>>>>> kernel/bpf/hashtab.c                          | 10 ++++++
>>>>>>>> kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c                         |  8 +++++
>>>>>>>> kernel/bpf/queue_stack_maps.c                 | 11 +++++-
>>>>>>>> kernel/bpf/syscall.c                          | 32 +++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>>> tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h                | 17 +++++++++
>>>>>>>> tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c                           | 16 +++++++++
>>>>>>>> tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h                           |  2 ++
>>>>>>>> tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map                      |  1 +
>>>>>>>> .../bpf/map_tests/lpm_trie_map_basic_ops.c    |  5 +++
>>>>>>>> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c       | 35 +++++++++++++++++++
>>>>>>>> 14 files changed, 171 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)



  reply	other threads:[~2025-01-16 17:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-06 14:53 [PATCH bpf-next 0/4] expose number of map entries to userspace Charalampos Stylianopoulos
2025-01-06 14:53 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/4] bpf: Add map_num_entries map op Charalampos Stylianopoulos
2025-01-06 14:53 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/4] bpf: Add bpf command to get number of map entries Charalampos Stylianopoulos
2025-01-07 17:52   ` kernel test robot
2025-01-06 14:53 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/4] libbpf: Add support for MAP_GET_NUM_ENTRIES command Charalampos Stylianopoulos
2025-01-06 14:53 ` [PATCH bpf-next 4/4] selftests/bpf: Add tests for bpf_map_get_num_entries Charalampos Stylianopoulos
2025-01-06 16:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next 0/4] expose number of map entries to userspace Daniel Borkmann
2025-01-07  7:43   ` Anton Protopopov
2025-01-07  7:48   ` Anton Protopopov
     [not found]     ` <CAAvdH+yNG=GefEd5CcP_52gPzzZexWMMxFAxnM3isX04iErMfQ@mail.gmail.com>
2025-01-07 11:10       ` Charalampos Stylianopoulos
2025-01-09 17:37         ` Anton Protopopov
2025-01-14 11:38           ` Nick Zavaritsky
2025-01-16 14:59             ` Anton Protopopov
2025-01-16 17:52               ` Nick Zavaritsky [this message]
2025-01-17 10:35                 ` Anton Protopopov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=AC7968EC-73CA-415B-8FAD-70C805075479@gmail.com \
    --to=mejedi@gmail.com \
    --cc=aspsk2@gmail.com \
    --cc=aspsk@isovalent.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=charalampos.stylianopoulos@gmail.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox