bpf.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
To: Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Menglong Dong <menglong.dong@linux.dev>,
	 Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
	 Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
	Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
	 LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Inlining migrate_disable/enable. Was: [PATCH bpf-next v2 02/18] x86,bpf: add bpf_global_caller for global trampoline
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2025 09:15:32 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAADnVQ+XGYp=ORtA730u7WQKqSGGH6R4=9CtYOPP_uHuJrYAkQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADxym3Za-zShEUyoVE7OoODKYXc1nghD63q2xv_wtHAyT2-Z-Q@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Jul 28, 2025 at 2:20 AM Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2025 at 6:35 AM Alexei Starovoitov
> <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 16, 2025 at 11:24 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jul 16, 2025 at 09:56:11AM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> > >
> > > > Maybe Peter has better ideas ?
> > >
> > > Is it possible to express runqueues::nr_pinned as an alias?
> > >
> > > extern unsigned int __attribute__((alias("runqueues.nr_pinned"))) this_nr_pinned;
> > >
> > > And use:
> > >
> > >         __this_cpu_inc(&this_nr_pinned);
> > >
> > >
> > > This syntax doesn't actually seem to work; but can we construct
> > > something like that?
> >
> > Yeah. Iant is right. It's a string and not a pointer dereference.
> > It never worked.
> >
> > Few options:
> >
> > 1.
> >  struct rq {
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> > +       unsigned int            nr_pinned;
> > +#endif
> >         /* runqueue lock: */
> >         raw_spinlock_t          __lock;
> >
> > @@ -1271,9 +1274,6 @@ struct rq {
> >         struct cpuidle_state    *idle_state;
> >  #endif
> >
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> > -       unsigned int            nr_pinned;
> > -#endif
> >
> > but ugly...
> >
> > 2.
> > static unsigned int nr_pinned_offset __ro_after_init __used;
> > RUNTIME_CONST(nr_pinned_offset, nr_pinned_offset)
> >
> > overkill for what's needed
> >
> > 3.
> > OFFSET(RQ_nr_pinned, rq, nr_pinned);
> > then
> > #include <generated/asm-offsets.h>
> >
> > imo the best.
>
> I had a try. The struct rq is not visible to asm-offsets.c, so we
> can't define it in arch/xx/kernel/asm-offsets.c. Do you mean
> to define a similar rq-offsets.c in kernel/sched/ ? It will be more
> complex than the way 2, and I think the second way 2 is
> easier :/

2 maybe easier, but it's an overkill.
I still think asm-offset is cleaner.
arch/xx shouldn't be used, of course, since this nr_pinned should
be generic for all archs.
We can do something similar to drivers/memory/emif-asm-offsets.c
and do that within kernel/sched/.
rq-offsets.c as you said.
It will generate rq-offsets.h in a build dir that can be #include-d.

I thought about another alternative (as a derivative of 1):
split nr_pinned from 'struct rq' into its own per-cpu variable,
but I don't think that will work, since rq_has_pinned_tasks()
doesn't always operate on this_rq().
So the acceptable choices are realistically 1 and 3 and
rq-offsets.c seems cleaner.
Pls give it another try.

  reply	other threads:[~2025-07-31 16:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 86+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-03 12:15 [PATCH bpf-next v2 00/18] bpf: tracing multi-link support Menglong Dong
2025-07-03 12:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 01/18] bpf: add function hash table for tracing-multi Menglong Dong
2025-07-04 16:07   ` kernel test robot
2025-07-15  1:55   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-07-15  2:37     ` Menglong Dong
2025-07-15  2:49       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-07-15  3:13         ` Menglong Dong
2025-07-15  9:06           ` Menglong Dong
2025-07-15 16:22             ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-07-03 12:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 02/18] x86,bpf: add bpf_global_caller for global trampoline Menglong Dong
2025-07-15  2:25   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-07-15  8:36     ` Menglong Dong
2025-07-15  9:30       ` Menglong Dong
2025-07-16 16:56         ` Inlining migrate_disable/enable. Was: " Alexei Starovoitov
2025-07-16 18:24           ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-07-16 22:35             ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-07-16 22:49               ` Steven Rostedt
2025-07-16 22:50                 ` Steven Rostedt
2025-07-28  9:20               ` Menglong Dong
2025-07-31 16:15                 ` Alexei Starovoitov [this message]
2025-08-01  1:42                   ` Menglong Dong
2025-08-06  8:44                   ` Menglong Dong
2025-08-08  0:58                     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-08-08  5:48                       ` Menglong Dong
2025-08-08  6:32                       ` Menglong Dong
2025-08-08 15:47                         ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-07-15 16:35       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-07-16 13:05         ` Menglong Dong
2025-07-17  0:59           ` multi-fentry proposal. Was: " Alexei Starovoitov
2025-07-17  1:50             ` Menglong Dong
2025-07-17  2:13               ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-07-17  2:37                 ` Menglong Dong
2025-07-16 14:40         ` Menglong Dong
2025-07-03 12:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 03/18] ftrace: factor out ftrace_direct_update from register_ftrace_direct Menglong Dong
2025-07-05  2:41   ` kernel test robot
2025-07-03 12:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 04/18] ftrace: add reset_ftrace_direct_ips Menglong Dong
2025-07-03 15:30   ` Steven Rostedt
2025-07-04  1:54     ` Menglong Dong
2025-07-07 18:52       ` Steven Rostedt
2025-07-08  1:26         ` Menglong Dong
2025-07-03 12:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 05/18] bpf: introduce bpf_gtramp_link Menglong Dong
2025-07-04  7:00   ` kernel test robot
2025-07-04  7:52   ` kernel test robot
2025-07-03 12:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 06/18] bpf: tracing: add support to record and check the accessed args Menglong Dong
2025-07-14 22:07   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-07-14 23:45     ` Menglong Dong
2025-07-15 17:11       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-07-16 12:50         ` Menglong Dong
2025-07-03 12:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 07/18] bpf: refactor the modules_array to ptr_array Menglong Dong
2025-07-03 12:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 08/18] bpf: verifier: add btf to the function args of bpf_check_attach_target Menglong Dong
2025-07-03 12:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 09/18] bpf: verifier: move btf_id_deny to bpf_check_attach_target Menglong Dong
2025-07-03 12:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 10/18] x86,bpf: factor out arch_bpf_get_regs_nr Menglong Dong
2025-07-03 12:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 11/18] bpf: tracing: add multi-link support Menglong Dong
2025-07-03 12:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 12/18] libbpf: don't free btf if tracing_multi progs existing Menglong Dong
2025-07-14 22:07   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-07-15  1:15     ` Menglong Dong
2025-07-03 12:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 13/18] libbpf: support tracing_multi Menglong Dong
2025-07-14 22:07   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-07-15  1:58     ` Menglong Dong
2025-07-15 17:20       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-07-16 12:43         ` Menglong Dong
2025-07-03 12:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 14/18] libbpf: add btf type hash lookup support Menglong Dong
2025-07-14 22:07   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-07-15  4:40     ` Menglong Dong
2025-07-15 17:20       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-07-16 11:53         ` Menglong Dong
2025-07-03 12:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 15/18] libbpf: add skip_invalid and attach_tracing for tracing_multi Menglong Dong
2025-07-14 22:07   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-07-15  5:48     ` Menglong Dong
2025-07-15 17:23       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-07-16 11:46         ` Menglong Dong
2025-07-03 12:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 16/18] selftests/bpf: move get_ksyms and get_addrs to trace_helpers.c Menglong Dong
2025-07-03 12:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 17/18] selftests/bpf: add basic testcases for tracing_multi Menglong Dong
2025-07-08 20:07   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-07-09  1:33     ` Menglong Dong
2025-07-14 23:49     ` Ihor Solodrai
2025-07-16  0:26       ` Ihor Solodrai
2025-07-16  0:31         ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-07-16  0:34           ` Ihor Solodrai
2025-07-03 12:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 18/18] selftests/bpf: add bench tests " Menglong Dong
2025-07-04  8:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 00/18] bpf: tracing multi-link support Jiri Olsa
2025-07-04  8:52   ` Menglong Dong
2025-07-04  8:58     ` Menglong Dong
2025-07-04  9:12       ` Jiri Olsa
2025-07-15  2:31 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-07-15  2:44   ` Menglong Dong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAADnVQ+XGYp=ORtA730u7WQKqSGGH6R4=9CtYOPP_uHuJrYAkQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=menglong.dong@linux.dev \
    --cc=menglong8.dong@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).