Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 0/2] BPF docs fixups

[Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>]

On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 10:54 AM Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 20 Jan 2021 13:39:44 +0000
> Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com> wrote:
>
> > Difference from v2->v3 [1]:
> >
> >  * Just fixed a commite message, rebased, and added Lukas' review tag - thanks
> >    Lukas!
> >
> > Difference from v1->v2 [1]:
> >
> >  * Split into 2 patches
> >
> >  * Avoided unnecessary ': ::' in .rst source
> >
> >  * Tweaked wording of the -mcpu=v3 bit a little more
> >
> > [1] Previous versions:
> >     v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CA+i-1C1LVKjfQLBYk6siiqhxfy0jCR7UBcAmJ4jCED0A9aWsxA@mail.gmail.com/T/#t
> >     v2: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210118155735.532663-1-jackmanb@google.com/T/#t
> >
> > Brendan Jackman (2):
> >   docs: bpf: Fixup atomics markup
> >   docs: bpf: Clarify -mcpu=v3 requirement for atomic ops
> >
> >  Documentation/networking/filter.rst | 20 +++++++++++---------
> >  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> I'm assuming these will go up through the BPF/networking trees; please let
> me know if I should pick them up instead.

I sent an email yesterday indicating that the set was applied to bpf-next.
There is no other tree it can be applied to without conflicts.
Looks like gmail is struggling again.