BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
To: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
	 andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev, eddyz87@gmail.com,
	song@kernel.org,  yonghong.song@linux.dev, kpsingh@kernel.org,
	sdf@google.com,  haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org,
	tj@kernel.org, void@manifault.com,  bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 bpf-next 0/5] bpf: Add bpf_iter_cpumask
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2024 16:18:41 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAEf4Bzanbs0dO1jvisuw4X1zk-6P0YRZO2sLAtXaCLuaZKpnxw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240206081416.26242-1-laoar.shao@gmail.com>

On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 12:14 AM Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Three new kfuncs, namely bpf_iter_cpumask_{new,next,destroy}, have been
> added for the new bpf_iter_cpumask functionality. These kfuncs enable the
> iteration of percpu data, such as runqueues, system_group_pcpu, and more.
>
> In our specific use case, we leverage the cgroup iterator to traverse
> percpu data, subsequently exposing it to userspace through a seq file.
> Refer to example in patch #2 for the usage.
>
> Changes:
> - v5 -> v6:
>   - Various improvements on the comments (Andrii)
>   - Use a static function instead as Kumar's patch[0] has been merged.
>     (Anrii, Yonghong)
>
> [0]. https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/170719262630.31872.2248639771567354367.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org
>
> - v4 -> v5:
>   - Use cpumask_size() instead of sizeof(struct cpumask) (David)
>   - Refactor the selftests as suggsted by David
>   - Improve the doc as suggested by David
> - v3 -> v4:
>   - Use a copy of cpumask to avoid potential use-after-free (Yonghong)
>   - Various code improvement in selftests (Yonghong)
> - v2 -> v3:
>   - Define KF_RCU_PROTECTED for bpf_iter_cpumask_new (Alexei)
>   - Code improvement in selftests
>   - Fix build error in selftest due to CONFIG_PSI=n
>     reported by kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> - v1 -> v2:
>   - Avoid changing cgroup subsystem (Tejun)
>   - Remove bpf_cpumask_set_from_pid(), and use bpf_cpumask_copy()
>     instead (Tejun)
>   - Use `int cpu;` field in bpf_iter_cpumask_kern (Andrii)
>
> Yafang Shao (5):
>   bpf: Add bpf_iter_cpumask kfuncs
>   bpf, docs: Add document for cpumask iter
>   selftests/bpf: Fix error checking for cpumask_success__load()
>   selftests/bpf: Mark cpumask kfunc declarations as __weak

I've applied patches 3 and 4, as they are general clean ups and
improvements independent from the actual iterator implementation.
Thanks!

>   selftests/bpf: Add selftests for cpumask iter
>
>  Documentation/bpf/cpumasks.rst                |  60 +++++++
>  kernel/bpf/cpumask.c                          |  79 +++++++++
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config            |   1 +
>  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/cpumask.c        | 158 +++++++++++++++++-
>  .../selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_common.h      |  60 +++----
>  .../bpf/progs/cpumask_iter_failure.c          |  99 +++++++++++
>  .../bpf/progs/cpumask_iter_success.c          | 126 ++++++++++++++
>  7 files changed, 552 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_iter_failure.c
>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_iter_success.c
>
> --
> 2.39.1
>

      parent reply	other threads:[~2024-02-08  0:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-06  8:14 [PATCH v6 bpf-next 0/5] bpf: Add bpf_iter_cpumask Yafang Shao
2024-02-06  8:14 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 1/5] bpf: Add bpf_iter_cpumask kfuncs Yafang Shao
2024-02-07  1:06   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-02-07  3:24     ` Yafang Shao
2024-02-06  8:14 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 2/5] bpf, docs: Add document for cpumask iter Yafang Shao
2024-02-06  8:14 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 3/5] selftests/bpf: Fix error checking for cpumask_success__load() Yafang Shao
2024-02-06  8:14 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 4/5] selftests/bpf: Mark cpumask kfunc declarations as __weak Yafang Shao
2024-02-06 15:48   ` Daniel Xu
2024-02-06  8:14 ` [PATCH v6 bpf-next 5/5] selftests/bpf: Add selftests for cpumask iter Yafang Shao
2024-02-08  0:18 ` Andrii Nakryiko [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAEf4Bzanbs0dO1jvisuw4X1zk-6P0YRZO2sLAtXaCLuaZKpnxw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=laoar.shao@gmail.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=sdf@google.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=void@manifault.com \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox