Re: [PATCH v1 12/14] sched: psi: implement psi trigger handling using bpf

[Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>]

On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 4:31 PM Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> wrote:
>
> Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> writes:
>
> > Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com> writes:
> >
> >> On Mon, Aug 18, 2025 at 10:02 AM Roman Gushchin
> >> <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>> +
> >>> +       /* Cgroup Id */
> >>> +       u64 cgroup_id;
> >>
> >> This cgroup_id field is weird. It's not initialized and not used here,
> >> then it gets initialized in the next patch and used in the last patch
> >> from a selftest. This is quite confusing. Also logically I don't think
> >> a cgroup attribute really belongs to psi_trigger... Can we at least
> >> move it into bpf_psi where it might fit a bit better?
> >
> > I can't move it to bpf_psi, because a single bpf_psi might own multiple
> > triggers with different cgroup_id's.
> > For sure I can move it to the next patch, if it's preferred.
> >
> > If you really don't like it here, other option is to replace it with
> > a new bpf helper (kfunc) which calculates the cgroup_id by walking the
> > trigger->group->cgroup->cgroup_id path each time.
>
> Actually there is no easy path from psi_group to cgroup, so there is
> no such option available, unfortunately. Or we need a back-link from
> the psi_group to cgroup.

Ok, I obviously missed some important relations between these
structures. Let me digest it some more before commenting further.