From: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
To: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Matt Bobrowski <mattbobrowski@google.com>,
Song Liu <song@kernel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 05/14] mm: introduce bpf_get_root_mem_cgroup() bpf kfunc
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2025 11:25:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAP01T772oh8t05Pth2eWFzfSGVWDuW6kujRVSYQEreqZy==nOQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250818170136.209169-6-roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
On Mon, 18 Aug 2025 at 19:02, Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev> wrote:
>
> Introduce a bpf kfunc to get a trusted pointer to the root memory
> cgroup. It's very handy to traverse the full memcg tree, e.g.
> for handling a system-wide OOM.
>
> It's possible to obtain this pointer by traversing the memcg tree
> up from any known memcg, but it's sub-optimal and makes bpf programs
> more complex and less efficient.
>
> bpf_get_root_mem_cgroup() has a KF_ACQUIRE | KF_RET_NULL semantics,
> however in reality it's not necessarily to bump the corresponding
> reference counter - root memory cgroup is immortal, reference counting
> is skipped, see css_get(). Once set, root_mem_cgroup is always a valid
> memcg pointer. It's safe to call bpf_put_mem_cgroup() for the pointer
> obtained with bpf_get_root_mem_cgroup(), it's effectively a no-op.
>
> Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>
> ---
> mm/bpf_memcontrol.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/bpf_memcontrol.c b/mm/bpf_memcontrol.c
> index 66f2a359af7e..a8faa561bcba 100644
> --- a/mm/bpf_memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/bpf_memcontrol.c
> @@ -10,6 +10,20 @@
>
> __bpf_kfunc_start_defs();
>
> +/**
> + * bpf_get_root_mem_cgroup - Returns a pointer to the root memory cgroup
> + *
> + * The function has KF_ACQUIRE semantics, even though the root memory
> + * cgroup is never destroyed after being created and doesn't require
> + * reference counting. And it's perfectly safe to pass it to
> + * bpf_put_mem_cgroup()
> + */
> +__bpf_kfunc struct mem_cgroup *bpf_get_root_mem_cgroup(void)
> +{
> + /* css_get() is not needed */
> + return root_mem_cgroup;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * bpf_get_mem_cgroup - Get a reference to a memory cgroup
> * @css: pointer to the css structure
> @@ -122,6 +136,7 @@ __bpf_kfunc void bpf_mem_cgroup_flush_stats(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
> __bpf_kfunc_end_defs();
>
> BTF_KFUNCS_START(bpf_memcontrol_kfuncs)
> +BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_get_root_mem_cgroup, KF_ACQUIRE | KF_RET_NULL)
Same suggestion here (re: trusted args).
> BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_get_mem_cgroup, KF_ACQUIRE | KF_RET_NULL)
> BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_put_mem_cgroup, KF_RELEASE)
>
> --
> 2.50.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-20 9:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-18 17:01 [PATCH v1 00/14] mm: BPF OOM Roman Gushchin
2025-08-18 17:01 ` [PATCH v1 01/14] mm: introduce bpf struct ops for OOM handling Roman Gushchin
2025-08-19 4:09 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-08-19 20:06 ` Roman Gushchin
2025-08-20 19:34 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-08-20 19:52 ` Roman Gushchin
2025-08-20 20:01 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-08-26 16:23 ` Amery Hung
2025-08-20 11:28 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-08-21 0:24 ` Roman Gushchin
2025-08-21 0:36 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-08-21 2:22 ` Roman Gushchin
2025-08-21 15:54 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-08-22 19:27 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-08-25 17:00 ` Roman Gushchin
2025-08-26 18:01 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-08-26 19:52 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-08-27 18:28 ` Roman Gushchin
2025-09-02 17:31 ` Roman Gushchin
2025-09-02 22:30 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-09-02 23:36 ` Roman Gushchin
2025-09-03 0:29 ` Tejun Heo
2025-09-03 23:30 ` Roman Gushchin
2025-08-26 16:56 ` Amery Hung
2025-08-18 17:01 ` [PATCH v1 02/14] bpf: mark struct oom_control's memcg field as TRUSTED_OR_NULL Roman Gushchin
2025-08-20 9:17 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-08-20 22:32 ` Roman Gushchin
2025-08-18 17:01 ` [PATCH v1 03/14] mm: introduce bpf_oom_kill_process() bpf kfunc Roman Gushchin
2025-08-18 17:01 ` [PATCH v1 04/14] mm: introduce bpf kfuncs to deal with memcg pointers Roman Gushchin
2025-08-20 9:21 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-08-20 22:43 ` Roman Gushchin
2025-08-20 23:33 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-08-18 17:01 ` [PATCH v1 05/14] mm: introduce bpf_get_root_mem_cgroup() bpf kfunc Roman Gushchin
2025-08-20 9:25 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi [this message]
2025-08-20 22:45 ` Roman Gushchin
2025-08-18 17:01 ` [PATCH v1 06/14] mm: introduce bpf_out_of_memory() " Roman Gushchin
2025-08-19 4:09 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-08-19 20:16 ` Roman Gushchin
2025-08-20 9:34 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-08-20 22:59 ` Roman Gushchin
2025-08-18 17:01 ` [PATCH v1 07/14] mm: allow specifying custom oom constraint for bpf triggers Roman Gushchin
2025-08-18 17:01 ` [PATCH v1 08/14] mm: introduce bpf_task_is_oom_victim() kfunc Roman Gushchin
2025-08-18 17:01 ` [PATCH v1 09/14] bpf: selftests: introduce read_cgroup_file() helper Roman Gushchin
2025-08-18 17:01 ` [PATCH v1 10/14] bpf: selftests: bpf OOM handler test Roman Gushchin
2025-08-20 9:33 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2025-08-20 22:49 ` Roman Gushchin
2025-08-20 20:23 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-08-21 0:10 ` Roman Gushchin
2025-08-18 17:01 ` [PATCH v1 11/14] sched: psi: refactor psi_trigger_create() Roman Gushchin
2025-08-19 4:09 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-08-19 20:28 ` Roman Gushchin
2025-08-18 17:01 ` [PATCH v1 12/14] sched: psi: implement psi trigger handling using bpf Roman Gushchin
2025-08-19 4:11 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-08-19 22:31 ` Roman Gushchin
2025-08-19 23:31 ` Roman Gushchin
2025-08-20 23:56 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-08-26 17:03 ` Amery Hung
2025-08-18 17:01 ` [PATCH v1 13/14] sched: psi: implement bpf_psi_create_trigger() kfunc Roman Gushchin
2025-08-20 20:30 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-08-21 0:36 ` Roman Gushchin
2025-08-22 19:13 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-08-22 19:57 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2025-08-25 16:56 ` Roman Gushchin
2025-08-18 17:01 ` [PATCH v1 14/14] bpf: selftests: psi struct ops test Roman Gushchin
2025-08-19 4:08 ` [PATCH v1 00/14] mm: BPF OOM Suren Baghdasaryan
2025-08-19 19:52 ` Roman Gushchin
2025-08-20 21:06 ` Shakeel Butt
2025-08-21 0:01 ` Roman Gushchin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAP01T772oh8t05Pth2eWFzfSGVWDuW6kujRVSYQEreqZy==nOQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mattbobrowski@google.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).