From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@gmail.com>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>, Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>,
John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>, Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>,
Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>, Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>,
James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>,
German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Riccardo Mancini <rickyman7@gmail.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Alexey Bayduraev <alexey.v.bayduraev@linux.intel.com>,
Alexander Antonov <alexander.antonov@linux.intel.com>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
coresight@lists.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] perf cpumap: Add intersect function.
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2022 17:59:02 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CE94B4BA-5073-4332-A13E-2CD20379AA19@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAP-5=fVfYtu=wcfUQEzwuJMhxexi3d8hVqF5QFLkj_FWPHLK5Q@mail.gmail.com>
On March 28, 2022 5:54:06 PM GMT-03:00, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com> wrote:
>On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 1:28 PM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
><acme@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> Em Sun, Mar 27, 2022 at 11:24:12PM -0700, Ian Rogers escreveu:
>> > The merge function gives the union of two cpu maps. Add an intersect
>> > function which will be used in the next change.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
>> > ---
>> > tools/lib/perf/cpumap.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> > tools/lib/perf/include/perf/cpumap.h | 2 ++
>> > 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/tools/lib/perf/cpumap.c b/tools/lib/perf/cpumap.c
>> > index 953bc50b0e41..56b4d213039f 100644
>> > --- a/tools/lib/perf/cpumap.c
>> > +++ b/tools/lib/perf/cpumap.c
>> > @@ -393,3 +393,41 @@ struct perf_cpu_map *perf_cpu_map__merge(struct perf_cpu_map *orig,
>> > perf_cpu_map__put(orig);
>> > return merged;
>> > }
>> > +
>> > +struct perf_cpu_map *perf_cpu_map__intersect(struct perf_cpu_map *orig,
>> > + struct perf_cpu_map *other)
>> > +{
>> > + struct perf_cpu *tmp_cpus;
>> > + int tmp_len;
>> > + int i, j, k;
>> > + struct perf_cpu_map *merged = NULL;
>> > +
>> > + if (perf_cpu_map__is_subset(other, orig))
>> > + return orig;
>> > + if (perf_cpu_map__is_subset(orig, other)) {
>> > + perf_cpu_map__put(orig);
>>
>> Why this put(orig)?
>
>As with merge, if orig isn't returned then it is put.
For merge I can see it dropping a reference, i.e. get b and merge it into a, after that b was "consumed"
But for intersect?
>
>> > + return perf_cpu_map__get(other);
>>
>> And why the get here and not on the first if?
>
>The first argument orig is either put or returned while the second may
>be returned only if the reference count is incremented. We could
>change the API for merge and intersect to put both arguments, or to
>not put either argument.
>
>Thanks,
>Ian
>
>> > + }
>> > +
>> > + tmp_len = max(orig->nr, other->nr);
>> > + tmp_cpus = malloc(tmp_len * sizeof(struct perf_cpu));
>> > + if (!tmp_cpus)
>> > + return NULL;
>> > +
>> > + i = j = k = 0;
>> > + while (i < orig->nr && j < other->nr) {
>> > + if (orig->map[i].cpu < other->map[j].cpu)
>> > + i++;
>> > + else if (orig->map[i].cpu > other->map[j].cpu)
>> > + j++;
>> > + else {
>> > + j++;
>> > + tmp_cpus[k++] = orig->map[i++];
>> > + }
>> > + }
>> > + if (k)
>> > + merged = cpu_map__trim_new(k, tmp_cpus);
>> > + free(tmp_cpus);
>> > + perf_cpu_map__put(orig);
>> > + return merged;
>> > +}
>> > diff --git a/tools/lib/perf/include/perf/cpumap.h b/tools/lib/perf/include/perf/cpumap.h
>> > index 4a2edbdb5e2b..a2a7216c0b78 100644
>> > --- a/tools/lib/perf/include/perf/cpumap.h
>> > +++ b/tools/lib/perf/include/perf/cpumap.h
>> > @@ -19,6 +19,8 @@ LIBPERF_API struct perf_cpu_map *perf_cpu_map__read(FILE *file);
>> > LIBPERF_API struct perf_cpu_map *perf_cpu_map__get(struct perf_cpu_map *map);
>> > LIBPERF_API struct perf_cpu_map *perf_cpu_map__merge(struct perf_cpu_map *orig,
>> > struct perf_cpu_map *other);
>> > +LIBPERF_API struct perf_cpu_map *perf_cpu_map__intersect(struct perf_cpu_map *orig,
>> > + struct perf_cpu_map *other);
>> > LIBPERF_API void perf_cpu_map__put(struct perf_cpu_map *map);
>> > LIBPERF_API struct perf_cpu perf_cpu_map__cpu(const struct perf_cpu_map *cpus, int idx);
>> > LIBPERF_API int perf_cpu_map__nr(const struct perf_cpu_map *cpus);
>> > --
>> > 2.35.1.1021.g381101b075-goog
>>
>> --
>>
>> - Arnaldo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-28 21:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-28 6:24 [PATCH 0/5] Make evlist CPUs more accurate Ian Rogers
2022-03-28 6:24 ` [PATCH 1/5] perf evlist: Rename cpus to user_cpus Ian Rogers
2022-03-28 20:18 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-03-28 20:58 ` Ian Rogers
2022-03-28 6:24 ` [PATCH 2/5] perf cpumap: More cpu map reuse by merge Ian Rogers
2022-03-28 20:26 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-03-28 20:50 ` Ian Rogers
2022-03-28 20:56 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-03-28 6:24 ` [PATCH 3/5] perf cpumap: Add intersect function Ian Rogers
2022-03-28 20:28 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-03-28 20:54 ` Ian Rogers
2022-03-28 20:59 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2022-03-28 21:25 ` Ian Rogers
2022-03-28 6:24 ` [PATCH 4/5] perf stat: Avoid segv if core.user_cpus isn't set Ian Rogers
2022-03-28 20:32 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-03-28 20:46 ` Ian Rogers
2022-03-28 6:24 ` [PATCH 5/5] perf evlist: Respect all_cpus when setting user_cpus Ian Rogers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CE94B4BA-5073-4332-A13E-2CD20379AA19@gmail.com \
--to=arnaldo.melo@gmail.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.antonov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexey.v.bayduraev@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=coresight@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=german.gomez@arm.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=james.clark@arm.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=kjain@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=leo.yan@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=mike.leach@linaro.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rickyman7@gmail.com \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox