From: "Emil Tsalapatis" <emil@etsalapatis.com>
To: "Weiming Shi" <bestswngs@gmail.com>,
"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"Andrii Nakryiko" <andrii@kernel.org>,
"Eduard Zingerman" <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
"Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi" <memxor@gmail.com>
Cc: "Martin KaFai Lau" <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
"Song Liu" <song@kernel.org>,
"Yonghong Song" <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
"Jiri Olsa" <jolsa@kernel.org>, <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
"Xiang Mei" <xmei5@asu.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf v3 0/2] bpf: reject negative CO-RE accessor indices
Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2026 14:06:55 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DHKKJS9TB2PD.1AEVJRSJD6ITY@etsalapatis.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260404161221.961828-1-bestswngs@gmail.com>
On Sat Apr 4, 2026 at 12:12 PM EDT, Weiming Shi wrote:
> bpf_core_parse_spec() parses CO-RE accessor strings with sscanf("%d"),
> which accepts negative values. The downstream bounds checks only test
> the upper bound, so a negative index like -1 slips through, gets cast
> to u32 0xffffffff in btf_member_bit_offset(), and crashes the kernel.
>
> To clarify the kernel-side concern from v2 review:
> tools/lib/bpf/relo_core.c is shared code -- the kernel compiles it
> directly via kernel/bpf/relo_core.c (#include). So the fix does
> apply in the kernel's BPF_PROG_LOAD -> check_core_relo() ->
> bpf_core_apply() -> bpf_core_parse_spec() path.
>
Since this text ends up in the git log, I think you can remove this
paragraph - especially since there is no permalink in the version
history below.
> v3: added selftest (patch 2/2)
> v2: fix typo Signed-off-by tag (missing leading 'S')
>
> Weiming Shi (2):
> bpf: reject negative CO-RE accessor indices in bpf_core_parse_spec()
> selftests/bpf: add test for negative CO-RE accessor index rejection
>
> tools/lib/bpf/relo_core.c | 2 +
> .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/core_reloc_raw.c | 94 +++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 96 insertions(+)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-04 18:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-04 16:12 [PATCH bpf v3 0/2] bpf: reject negative CO-RE accessor indices Weiming Shi
2026-04-04 16:12 ` [PATCH bpf v3 1/2] bpf: reject negative CO-RE accessor indices in bpf_core_parse_spec() Weiming Shi
2026-04-04 18:07 ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-04-06 15:01 ` Paul Chaignon
2026-04-04 16:12 ` [PATCH bpf v3 2/2] selftests/bpf: add test for negative CO-RE accessor index rejection Weiming Shi
2026-04-04 18:12 ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-04-06 15:03 ` Paul Chaignon
2026-04-04 18:06 ` Emil Tsalapatis [this message]
2026-04-07 15:30 ` [PATCH bpf v3 0/2] bpf: reject negative CO-RE accessor indices patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DHKKJS9TB2PD.1AEVJRSJD6ITY@etsalapatis.com \
--to=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bestswngs@gmail.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=xmei5@asu.edu \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox