From: "Ricardo B. Marlière" <rbm@suse.com>
To: <bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org>, <rbm@suse.com>, <ast@kernel.org>,
<daniel@iogearbox.net>, <andrii@kernel.org>,
<martin.lau@linux.dev>, <eddyz87@gmail.com>, <memxor@gmail.com>,
<song@kernel.org>, <yonghong.song@linux.dev>, <jolsa@kernel.org>,
<shuah@kernel.org>, <nathan@kernel.org>,
<nick.desaulniers+lkml@gmail.com>, <morbo@google.com>,
<justinstitt@google.com>
Cc: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <llvm@lists.linux.dev>,
<alan.maguire@oracle.com>, <martin.lau@kernel.org>,
<clm@meta.com>, <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v9 01/11] selftests/bpf: Add BPF_STRICT_BUILD toggle
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2026 13:03:33 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DI5RKYBPGRCQ.1O50VPXB7QXQX@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e020f5f82d86e5da292d0ba7b1d707d5ce47f741fd77019d209853b8b7582816@mail.kernel.org>
On Wed Apr 29, 2026 at 12:13 PM -03, bot+bpf-ci wrote:
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
>> index 97ee61f2ade5..6094fe99b5f6 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
>> @@ -44,6 +44,12 @@ SKIP_LLVM ?=
>> SKIP_LIBBFD ?=
>> SKIP_CRYPTO ?=
>>
>> +# When BPF_STRICT_BUILD is 1, any BPF object, skeleton, test object, or
>> +# benchmark compilation failure is fatal. Set to 0 to tolerate failures
>> +# and continue building the remaining tests.
>> +BPF_STRICT_BUILD ?= 1
>> +PERMISSIVE := $(filter 0,$(BPF_STRICT_BUILD))
>> +
>> ifeq ($(srctree),)
>> srctree := $(patsubst %/,%,$(dir $(CURDIR)))
>> srctree := $(patsubst %/,%,$(dir $(srctree)))
>
> Multiple reviewers (Sashiko AI and bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org) raised a concern
> in v5 that when permissive mode skips building .ko files, the
> $(TRUNNER_BINARY)-extras rsync target will fail fatally during out-of-tree
> builds (when O= is set) because TEST_KMOD_TARGETS are included in
> TRUNNER_EXTRA_FILES but the .ko files were never created.
>
> The rsync command lacks --ignore-missing-args flag to handle missing files:
>
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile:$(TRUNNER_BINARY)-extras {
> $(call msg,EXT-COPY,$(TRUNNER_BINARY),$(TRUNNER_EXTRA_FILES))
> $(Q)rsync -aq $$^ $(TRUNNER_OUTPUT)/
> }
>
> According to the v6 changelog, this was addressed by adding
> --ignore-missing-args to the -extras rsync, but this fix does not appear
> in the current commit. Does the rsync command need --ignore-missing-args
> to prevent 'No such file or directory' errors when .ko files are missing
> in permissive mode during out-of-tree builds?
This patch only adds BPF_STRICT_BUILD/PERMISSIVE variables. The rsync
fix comes next in "[PATCH bpf-next v9 02/11] selftests/bpf: Fix
test_kmods KDIR to honor O= and distro kernels".
>
> Reference:
> https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260415211828.BFAFFC19424@smtp.kernel.org/
> Reviewer: Sashiko AI
> Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2026 21:18:28 +0000
>
>
> ---
> AI reviewed your patch. Please fix the bug or email reply why it's not a bug.
> See: https://github.com/kernel-patches/vmtest/blob/master/ci/claude/README.md
>
> CI run summary: https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/25115689001
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-29 16:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-29 14:33 [PATCH bpf-next v9 00/11] selftests/bpf: Tolerate partial builds across kernel configs Ricardo B. Marlière
2026-04-29 14:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 01/11] selftests/bpf: Add BPF_STRICT_BUILD toggle Ricardo B. Marlière
2026-04-29 15:13 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-04-29 16:03 ` Ricardo B. Marlière [this message]
2026-04-29 14:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 02/11] selftests/bpf: Fix test_kmods KDIR to honor O= and distro kernels Ricardo B. Marlière
2026-04-29 19:41 ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-29 14:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 03/11] selftests/bpf: Tolerate BPF and skeleton generation failures Ricardo B. Marlière
2026-04-29 15:13 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-04-29 16:03 ` Ricardo B. Marlière
2026-04-29 14:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 04/11] selftests/bpf: Avoid rebuilds when running emit_tests Ricardo B. Marlière
2026-04-29 14:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 05/11] selftests/bpf: Make skeleton headers order-only prerequisites of .test.d Ricardo B. Marlière
2026-04-29 20:23 ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-29 14:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 06/11] selftests/bpf: Tolerate test file compilation failures Ricardo B. Marlière
2026-04-29 20:37 ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-29 14:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 07/11] selftests/bpf: Skip tests whose objects were not built Ricardo B. Marlière
2026-04-29 14:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 08/11] selftests/bpf: Allow test_progs to link with a partial object set Ricardo B. Marlière
2026-04-29 14:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 09/11] selftests/bpf: Tolerate benchmark build failures Ricardo B. Marlière
2026-04-29 21:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-29 14:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 10/11] selftests/bpf: Provide weak definitions for cross-test functions Ricardo B. Marlière
2026-04-29 21:29 ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-29 14:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 11/11] selftests/bpf: Tolerate missing files during install Ricardo B. Marlière
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DI5RKYBPGRCQ.1O50VPXB7QXQX@suse.com \
--to=rbm@suse.com \
--cc=alan.maguire@oracle.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=clm@meta.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=justinstitt@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=morbo@google.com \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=nick.desaulniers+lkml@gmail.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox