From: "Alexei Starovoitov" <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
To: "John Fastabend" <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
"Sechang Lim" <rhkrqnwk98@gmail.com>
Cc: "Jiayuan Chen" <jiayuan.chen@linux.dev>,
"Jakub Sitnicki" <jakub@cloudflare.com>,
"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
"Kuniyuki Iwashima" <kuniyu@google.com>,
"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"Willem de Bruijn" <willemb@google.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"Simon Horman" <horms@kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<bpf@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf] bpf, sockmap: fix lock inversion between stab->lock and sk_callback_lock
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2026 14:55:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DJDD01YMA1GE.3G7B4LE5H780G@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ajLR9CRn6O27Ound@john-p8>
On Wed Jun 17, 2026 at 9:59 AM PDT, John Fastabend wrote:
>
> The bot also thinks it found another locking issue. I'm not sure
> supporting 'tc' is really needed here. sockmap is much more easy
> to reason about from socket layer. What about just blocking sockmap
> manipulations from these prog types.
>
> My current thinking on sockmap at the moment is its has sprawled
> across so many layers the locking is overly tricky to reason about.
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> index d9bdc3b32c05..5e08d3e03453 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> @@ -8567,11 +8567,7 @@ static bool may_update_sockmap(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int func_id)
> return true;
> break;
> case BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER:
> - case BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS:
> - case BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_ACT:
> - case BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP:
> case BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_REUSEPORT:
> - case BPF_PROG_TYPE_FLOW_DISSECTOR:
> case BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_LOOKUP:
> return true;
+1. Let's disable.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-19 21:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-16 9:11 [PATCH bpf] bpf, sockmap: fix lock inversion between stab->lock and sk_callback_lock Sechang Lim
2026-06-16 9:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-16 10:17 ` Jiayuan Chen
2026-06-16 18:40 ` Sechang Lim
2026-06-17 16:59 ` John Fastabend
2026-06-19 21:55 ` Alexei Starovoitov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DJDD01YMA1GE.3G7B4LE5H780G@gmail.com \
--to=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=jakub@cloudflare.com \
--cc=jiayuan.chen@linux.dev \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=kuniyu@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=rhkrqnwk98@gmail.com \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox