From: "Emil Tsalapatis" <emil@etsalapatis.com>
To: "Mahe Tardy" <mahe.tardy@gmail.com>, <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <andrii@kernel.org>, <ast@kernel.org>, <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
<john.fastabend@gmail.com>, <jordan@jrife.io>,
<martin.lau@linux.dev>, <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
<emil@etsalapatis.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v9 1/5] bpf: add bpf_icmp_send kfunc
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2026 15:10:49 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DJHIMU9I8SWV.2EE7R1UL9SPZC@etsalapatis.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260624185554.362555-2-mahe.tardy@gmail.com>
On Wed Jun 24, 2026 at 2:55 PM EDT, Mahe Tardy wrote:
> This is needed in the context of Tetragon to provide improved feedback
> (in contrast to just dropping packets) to east-west traffic when blocked
> by policies using cgroup_skb programs.
>
> This reuses concepts from netfilter reject target codepath with the
> differences that:
> * Packets are cloned since the BPF user can still let the packet pass
> (SK_PASS from the cgroup_skb progs for example) and the current skb
> need to stay untouched (cgroup_skb hooks only allow read-only skb
> payload).
> * We protect against recursion since the kfunc, by generating an ICMP
> error message, could retrigger the BPF prog that invoked it.
>
> Only ICMP_DEST_UNREACH and ICMPV6_DEST_UNREACH are currently supported.
> The interface accepts a type parameter to facilitate future extension to
> other ICMP control message types.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mahe Tardy <mahe.tardy@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Emil Tsalapatis <emil@etsalapatis.com>
> ---
> net/core/filter.c | 91 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 91 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
> index 2e96b4b847ce..f3aa494ed105 100644
> --- a/net/core/filter.c
> +++ b/net/core/filter.c
> @@ -84,6 +84,9 @@
> #include <linux/un.h>
> #include <net/xdp_sock_drv.h>
> #include <net/inet_dscp.h>
> +#include <linux/icmpv6.h>
> +#include <net/icmp.h>
> +#include <net/ip6_route.h>
>
> #include "dev.h"
>
> @@ -12546,6 +12549,84 @@ __bpf_kfunc int bpf_xdp_pull_data(struct xdp_md *x, u32 len)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +/**
> + * bpf_icmp_send - Send an ICMP control message
> + * @skb_ctx: Packet that triggered the control message
> + * @type: ICMP type (only ICMP_DEST_UNREACH/ICMPV6_DEST_UNREACH supported)
> + * @code: ICMP code (0-15 except ICMP_FRAG_NEEDED for IPv4, 0-6 for IPv6)
> + *
> + * Sends an ICMP control message in response to the packet. The original packet
> + * is cloned before sending the ICMP message, so the BPF program can still let
> + * the packet pass if desired.
> + *
> + * Currently only ICMP_DEST_UNREACH (IPv4) and ICMPV6_DEST_UNREACH (IPv6) are
> + * supported.
> + *
> + * Return: 0 on success (send attempt), negative error code on failure:
> + * -EBUSY: Recursion detected
> + * -EPROTONOSUPPORT: Non-IP protocol
> + * -EOPNOTSUPP: Unsupported ICMP type
> + * -EINVAL: Invalid code parameter
> + * -ENETUNREACH: Unusable IPv4 route/dst attached to the skb
> + * -ENOMEM: Memory allocation failed
> + */
> +__bpf_kfunc int bpf_icmp_send(struct __sk_buff *skb_ctx, int type, int code)
> +{
> + struct sk_buff *skb = (struct sk_buff *)skb_ctx;
> + struct sk_buff *nskb;
> + struct sock *sk;
> +
> + sk = skb_to_full_sk(skb);
> + if (sk && sk->sk_kern_sock &&
> + (sk->sk_protocol == IPPROTO_ICMP || sk->sk_protocol == IPPROTO_ICMPV6))
> + return -EBUSY;
> +
> + switch (skb->protocol) {
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_INET)
> + case htons(ETH_P_IP): {
> + if (type != ICMP_DEST_UNREACH)
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + if (code < 0 || code > NR_ICMP_UNREACH ||
> + code == ICMP_FRAG_NEEDED) /* needs a valid next-hop MTU */
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + /* icmp_send requires a rtable; test-run synthetic skbs lack one. */
> + if (!skb_valid_dst(skb))
> + return -ENETUNREACH;
> +
> + nskb = skb_clone(skb, GFP_ATOMIC);
> + if (!nskb)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + memset(IPCB(nskb), 0, sizeof(*IPCB(nskb)));
> + icmp_send(nskb, type, code, 0);
> + consume_skb(nskb);
> + break;
> + }
> +#endif
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
> + case htons(ETH_P_IPV6):
> + if (type != ICMPV6_DEST_UNREACH)
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> + if (code < 0 || code > ICMPV6_REJECT_ROUTE)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + nskb = skb_clone(skb, GFP_ATOMIC);
> + if (!nskb)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + memset(IP6CB(nskb), 0, sizeof(*IP6CB(nskb)));
> + icmpv6_send(nskb, type, code, 0);
> + consume_skb(nskb);
> + break;
> +#endif
> + default:
> + return -EPROTONOSUPPORT;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> __bpf_kfunc_end_defs();
>
> int bpf_dynptr_from_skb_rdonly(struct __sk_buff *skb, u64 flags,
> @@ -12588,6 +12669,10 @@ BTF_KFUNCS_START(bpf_kfunc_check_set_sock_ops)
> BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_sock_ops_enable_tx_tstamp)
> BTF_KFUNCS_END(bpf_kfunc_check_set_sock_ops)
>
> +BTF_KFUNCS_START(bpf_kfunc_check_set_icmp_send)
> +BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_icmp_send)
> +BTF_KFUNCS_END(bpf_kfunc_check_set_icmp_send)
> +
> static const struct btf_kfunc_id_set bpf_kfunc_set_skb = {
> .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> .set = &bpf_kfunc_check_set_skb,
> @@ -12618,6 +12703,11 @@ static const struct btf_kfunc_id_set bpf_kfunc_set_sock_ops = {
> .set = &bpf_kfunc_check_set_sock_ops,
> };
>
> +static const struct btf_kfunc_id_set bpf_kfunc_set_icmp_send = {
> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> + .set = &bpf_kfunc_check_set_icmp_send,
> +};
> +
> static int __init bpf_kfunc_init(void)
> {
> int ret;
> @@ -12639,6 +12729,7 @@ static int __init bpf_kfunc_init(void)
> ret = ret ?: register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SOCK_ADDR,
> &bpf_kfunc_set_sock_addr);
> ret = ret ?: register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, &bpf_kfunc_set_tcp_reqsk);
> + ret = ret ?: register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB, &bpf_kfunc_set_icmp_send);
> return ret ?: register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCK_OPS, &bpf_kfunc_set_sock_ops);
> }
> late_initcall(bpf_kfunc_init);
> --
> 2.34.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-24 19:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-24 18:55 [PATCH bpf-next v9 0/5] bpf: add icmp_send kfunc Mahe Tardy
2026-06-24 18:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 1/5] bpf: add bpf_icmp_send kfunc Mahe Tardy
2026-06-24 19:10 ` Emil Tsalapatis [this message]
2026-06-24 19:19 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-24 20:51 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-06-24 21:24 ` Jordan Rife
2026-06-24 18:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 2/5] selftests/bpf: add bpf_icmp_send kfunc cgroup_skb tests Mahe Tardy
2026-06-24 18:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 3/5] selftests/bpf: add bpf_icmp_send kfunc cgroup_skb IPv6 tests Mahe Tardy
2026-06-24 21:24 ` Jordan Rife
2026-06-24 18:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 4/5] selftests/bpf: add bpf_icmp_send recursion test Mahe Tardy
2026-06-24 21:24 ` Jordan Rife
2026-06-24 18:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 5/5] selftests/bpf: add bpf_icmp_send no route test Mahe Tardy
2026-06-24 19:13 ` Emil Tsalapatis
2026-06-24 21:24 ` Jordan Rife
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DJHIMU9I8SWV.2EE7R1UL9SPZC@etsalapatis.com \
--to=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jordan@jrife.io \
--cc=mahe.tardy@gmail.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox