BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Alexis Lothoré" <alexis.lothore@bootlin.com>
To: <sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev>
Cc: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 10/10] selftests/bpf: add tests to validate KASAN on JIT programs
Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2026 16:13:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DJSEG7DCNE1G.G2EYFS9AQENJ@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260701103414.03E1C1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org>

On Wed Jul 1, 2026 at 12:34 PM CEST, sashiko-bot wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
> - [Medium] Uninitialized stack memory is passed to the kernel via bpf_prog_test_run_opts, causing potential information leaks and triggering MSAN warnings.
> - [Medium] The KASAN report parser is susceptible to spurious failures due to kernel log interleaving.
> --
>
> commit e974c567c6b3da1ae6e1c27c442840d9bd396091
> Author: Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation) <alexis.lothore@bootlin.com>
>
> selftests/bpf: add tests to validate KASAN on JIT programs
>
> This patch adds a basic KASAN test runner that loads and test-runs BPF programs
> designed to trigger memory management bugs. The test captures kernel logs and
> ensures the expected KASAN splat is emitted by searching for the corresponding
> first lines in the report.
>
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kasan.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kasan.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000000000..ff070c39eaac1
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kasan.c
>
> [ ... ]
>
>> +static int check_kasan_report_in_kernel_logs(char *buf, struct test_ctx *ctx,
>> +					     bool is_write, int size)
>> +{
>> +	char *access_desc_start, *access_desc_end, *tmp;
>
> [ ... ]
>
>> +	/* Find next line */
>> +	access_desc_start = strchr(kasan_report_start, '\n');
>> +	if (!access_desc_start)
>> +		return 1;
>> +	access_desc_start++;
>> +
>> +	access_desc_end = strchr(access_desc_start, '\n');
>> +	if (!access_desc_end)
>> +		return 1;
>> +
>> +	nsize = snprintf(access_log, READ_CHUNK_SIZE, KASAN_PATTERN_REPORT,
>> +			 is_write ? "Write" : "Read", size);
>> +
>> +	tmp = memmem(access_desc_start, access_desc_end - access_desc_start,
>> +		     access_log, nsize);
>
> [Severity: Medium]
> Could this fail if other kernel components interleave log messages between the
> KASAN header and the access description?
>
> The parser assumes the exact next newline-delimited block contains the access
> description. However, the report_lock used by KASAN internally only serializes
> KASAN reports with each other, not with general printk output from other CPUs
> or contexts. If another component prints a message precisely between the KASAN
> header and the access description, the search bounds might be restricted to an
> unrelated interleaved log line, causing memmem() to fail and making the test
> flaky.

Indeed. I'll update this to search _in the rest of the logs_ rather than
_on the very next line_, assuming that each subtest generates at most a single
report.

Alexis


-- 
Alexis Lothoré, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com


      reply	other threads:[~2026-07-07 14:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-01 10:02 [PATCH bpf-next v3 00/10] bpf: add support for KASAN checks in JITed programs Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation)
2026-07-01 10:02 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 01/10] bpf: propagate original instruction offset when patching program Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation)
2026-07-01 10:20   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-01 10:02 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 02/10] bpf: mark instructions accessing program stack Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation)
2026-07-01 10:19   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-01 10:02 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 03/10] bpf: add BPF_JIT_KASAN for KASAN instrumentation of JITed programs Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation)
2026-07-01 10:12   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-07 12:07     ` Alexis Lothoré
2026-07-01 10:44   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-07-01 13:43   ` Andrey Konovalov
2026-07-06 14:16     ` Alexis Lothoré
2026-07-06 15:02       ` Andrey Konovalov
2026-07-01 10:02 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 04/10] bpf, x86: add helper to emit kasan checks in x86 " Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation)
2026-07-01 10:16   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-07 13:44     ` Alexis Lothoré
2026-07-01 10:44   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-07-07 14:04     ` Alexis Lothoré
2026-07-01 10:02 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 05/10] bpf, x86: refactor BPF_ST management in do_jit Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation)
2026-07-01 10:02 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 06/10] bpf, x86: emit KASAN checks into x86 JITed programs Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation)
2026-07-01 10:18   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-01 10:44   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-07-01 10:02 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 07/10] bpf, x86: enable KASAN for JITed programs on x86 Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation)
2026-07-01 10:15   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-01 10:02 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 08/10] selftests/bpf: add helper to check whether eBPF KASAN is active Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation)
2026-07-01 10:02 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 09/10] selftests/bpf: move bpf_jit_harden helper into testing_helpers Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation)
2026-07-01 10:02 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 10/10] selftests/bpf: add tests to validate KASAN on JIT programs Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation)
2026-07-01 10:34   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-07 14:13     ` Alexis Lothoré [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DJSEG7DCNE1G.G2EYFS9AQENJ@bootlin.com \
    --to=alexis.lothore@bootlin.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox