From: "Alexis Lothoré" <alexis.lothore@bootlin.com>
To: "Ricardo B. Marlière" <rbm@suse.com>,
"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"Andrii Nakryiko" <andrii@kernel.org>,
"Eduard Zingerman" <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
"Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi" <memxor@gmail.com>,
"Martin KaFai Lau" <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
"Song Liu" <song@kernel.org>,
"Yonghong Song" <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
"Jiri Olsa" <jolsa@kernel.org>,
"Emil Tsalapatis" <emil@etsalapatis.com>,
"Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>,
"Alexis Lothoré (eBPF Foundation)" <alexis.lothore@bootlin.com>,
"Ihor Solodrai" <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>,
"Christian Brauner" <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] selftests/bpf: Install bpftool where test_progs expects to find it
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2026 17:32:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DJXJWE3X286K.16LM4LUS201ZP@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260710-selftests-bpf_fixes-v1-1-aa24dfd6f4f9@suse.com>
Hi,
On Sat Jul 11, 2026 at 12:09 AM CEST, Ricardo B. Marlière wrote:
> bpftool_helpers.c looks for bpftool at "tools/sbin/bpftool" or
> "../tools/sbin/bpftool" relative to the running test_progs binary, matching
> the build directory layout where bpftool sits at
> $(OUTPUT)/tools/sbin/bpftool.
>
> INSTALL_RULE installs bpftool through the generic TEST_GEN_PROGS_EXTENDED
> mechanism, which flattens it straight into $(INSTALL_PATH) and loses the
> tools/sbin/ prefix. After "make install", every flavor of test_progs,
> including the default one, fails to locate bpftool, and bpftool_maps_access
> and bpftool_metadata error out with "Failed to detect bpftool path", even
> though bpftool itself built and installed fine.
>
> Explicitly install bpftool under tools/sbin/ in the installed tree
> so its relative location matches what detect_bpftool_path() already
> expects, restoring the pre-install layout instead of introducing a
> new one.
>
> Fixes: f21fae577446 ("selftests/bpf: Add a few helpers for bpftool testing")
> Signed-off-by: Ricardo B. Marlière <rbm@suse.com>
I did not face the issue because I am running the selftests in-tree, and
the CI seems to do the same, but for users using selftests after running
`make install`, I guess the change makes sense.
That's not the first fix aiming to improve bpftool
detection/installation (eg the BPFTOOL env variable, see [1]), so it
makes me wonder if we shouldn't just make bpftool part of
TRUNNER_EXTRA_FILES for all flavours of test_progs, similarly to other
binaries needed during tests (eg: urandom_read), instead of just adding
some bpftool-specific details in this generic install rule, and just
make the test runners assume that the needed binary is in the same
directory.
Alexis
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260223191118.655185-2-ihor.solodrai@linux.dev/
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
> index b642ee489ea6..47911c9b4977 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
> @@ -1055,6 +1055,8 @@ endif
> DEFAULT_INSTALL_RULE := $(INSTALL_RULE)
> override define INSTALL_RULE
> $(DEFAULT_INSTALL_RULE)
> + @mkdir -p $(INSTALL_PATH)/tools/sbin
> + @rsync -a $(if $(PERMISSIVE),--ignore-missing-args) $(TRUNNER_BPFTOOL) $(INSTALL_PATH)/tools/sbin/
> @for DIR in $(TEST_INST_SUBDIRS); do \
> mkdir -p $(INSTALL_PATH)/$$DIR; \
> rsync -a $(if $(PERMISSIVE),--ignore-missing-args) \
--
Alexis Lothoré, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-13 15:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-10 22:09 [PATCH 0/4] selftests/bpf: A few edge case fixes Ricardo B. Marlière
2026-07-10 22:09 ` [PATCH 1/4] selftests/bpf: Install bpftool where test_progs expects to find it Ricardo B. Marlière
2026-07-13 15:32 ` Alexis Lothoré [this message]
2026-07-10 22:09 ` [PATCH 2/4] selftests/bpf: Install resolve_btfids.test.o.BTF where the test expects it Ricardo B. Marlière
2026-07-10 22:09 ` [PATCH 3/4] selftests/bpf: Fix lsm_bdev dev_t encoding mismatch Ricardo B. Marlière
2026-07-10 22:09 ` [PATCH 4/4] libbpf: Search /lib64 and /lib in resolve_full_path() Ricardo B. Marlière
2026-07-10 22:58 ` bot+bpf-ci
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DJXJWE3X286K.16LM4LUS201ZP@bootlin.com \
--to=alexis.lothore@bootlin.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=rbm@suse.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox