From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ej2-f11.google.com (mail-ej2-f11.google.com [74.125.228.139]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC7BC426429 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2026 12:23:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=74.125.228.139 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787660594; cv=none; b=WfF36V23lrVHyTJjSiVeIcgNMzuefl9gnS38pdTOehFRMRBeCqq/Wq6fhWeqXZoOdN2PFREFGviNv4cPE0kMRzeECbB4ZajAMNOySMn8jFBfsDeF/R4OlqFjqCFemAXiRuvjqhkM+2Pz4SKzjkcruk3HuACDwFmtKB3JsN6IrLs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1787660594; c=relaxed/simple; bh=T82kPS0r20tb52VMwMiP90ZL+6R9xinNvOVGOM6Amm4=; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Cc:Subject:From:To: References:In-Reply-To; b=ITDtj7KiU7r6HsqDy3AkPGOyqPjxnpG8xRpjIVehGS6RYQ8XyJu89yB4nqjAohkTnF5KKXVnISiA1df8+it3WHwY5BiBn+kpgBKDWx/n29r0rVG6jbHEj/BBQK9dD2HHc1e2MUpNBXmvjKa/mHuoQWwpFx7rgSxNvkwXx+7bJB4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=ij/XQ/w4; arc=none smtp.client-ip=74.125.228.139 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="ij/XQ/w4" Received: by mail-ej2-f11.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-c2117cb0c09so183772066b.0 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2026 05:23:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20251104; t=1787660591; x=1788265391; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:references:to:from:subject:cc:message-id:date :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=bjm6ttTTLAAxVRPB57CUI15k21GkGZTZ0M8HFR93li8=; b=ij/XQ/w4hJMAW/ppnF3tfa8BoVn9rOdrvNN/Bdmd1eJUrc79zcCTYLLgJuJngGkZZn JfjdYtYGqOGsgBZgH+ap2ZhV9yH14P/yyXgmYaUXS2aWLbVkcDqaQMHxCpvVXUPToNYa Hedgnm4Ct8ComGJJ9aV7gj37KtNeoSYIRVMDFTqpfqtdZp/gJR4iJVZhaQKhGaXpveAV OXcCLhYRBIkxrFAYxI8mOiUsOf16VxTX0j5dKCfWNqnLLtUdT4CL1wQ19y734Q7HK5xb 8AHx+0xya9V2az5euzLt8rM2vAIv5BybbzTtby3t6gPIXSTpB1zeUL/6NtgrgCC0+EW7 iIOg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1787660591; x=1788265391; h=in-reply-to:references:to:from:subject:cc:message-id:date :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:x-gm-gg :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to :content-type; bh=bjm6ttTTLAAxVRPB57CUI15k21GkGZTZ0M8HFR93li8=; b=Afssth+MV4t8QS7IKpWf4v05gx8Zh51svj64JnKQ72GeVZUOt82sz+ZwXnfz1uR4CZ +YXe8dPGVNbzhQhtTYtudwQ/izx7L5FsXtmm2BMOcE6/PKzmQxzL5iirkJFrX27tK6WN METUS6L/m7qic6qmqjwRGaEszeYkElgFIdZKyLfDUGQ8DkG+PItNTV3C88W0d5SY9xtC bG6Xfdt+HE1XnrnjC+LHPZVIrfF0d3Zd0EAKpMzlKwYFaKcJZu1ZNdpfnjZQrO89tE5h Tlnvl0V7JfAWlEVx3GjGyoZquzNXArRMc8K7pY36+A4SRpaIy6yRcAx+XWOJeNFMdPb7 YT5A== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AHgh+RpVQm56fubU8Y1ME9d8K79BInxwGbLl//r0tbtW4JM71y1O3U2+Obclx88/6gdPUtq99Vg=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AFuF++kLVc5tl6SViWYIsXCCmi9Z6/gja7+dx8xsDX/i37cfvAcmxjk6 kH2x7z50g2iHE0YUPJ2M83On76a2ddGUwYgZo1wqgmsmL7PRJvZY17mn X-Gm-Gg: AR+sD10xy+foZ55IxMNoPeZ0nICXTWIjdJiphDUq90/ltijzym3PWtxC4vQAmpq+Q83 pmZ87GxkupXEcbY0UHKEK+MD8ftidm9JVxr2PNafhQc2eNNdQ2zoAzkactSmSCKuuAWTmWzkmK+ mZDjo4zV8CvVTfAnEa69H77vLMMQFg3ucIcs4LnlRNoN8+fbVIwBi8nwdB0/JeBd+vgfP+4m0yK 4mZaYe2PS3b3e5FJR0dcCL0Q0Rv/2MjYw0ukLj8N8NaeEfGIC9Pp5e3luvtxTiZRDV30bgK7AnK uSWReHo1dzy+9Xnh3c5veg8OcRD0azM9vkQ4mayCz2mdAhKcNe45VOkTcyLVgINqZCZDoyW8S9a U53S2Neq6tGcPx2hVVJI+JyPvAoQUjSGWkzKQnDdoF1esYzN3f4sPagnZJAEzNPJN18apAHFhMN 4Cihxso14wEYXariKeOnWxaOg3M+Kefyxn63hNUvRwaHLJNXvOgVXC6WZHmurdp778m2y8IHrTb j3pUwbRpfrcl9Of+S/QdCoHXbxL6l9bqC28j9oBmuujyal5QZPL6YIISbWa6CfvE3SDRdmoCx3r nzE6C0cbQ3JLHQsixxdTgYokDU6HO/rcFHkbzQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:3e1a:b0:c24:6505:8f67 with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-c24e589a884mr660203266b.10.1787660590418; Tue, 25 Aug 2026 05:23:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (nat-icclus-192-26-29-3.epfl.ch. [192.26.29.3]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a640c23a62f3a-c249606b60asm1629389366b.9.2026.08.25.05.23.08 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 25 Aug 2026 05:23:08 -0700 (PDT) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2026 14:23:08 +0200 Message-Id: Cc: , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v6 4/4] selftests/bpf: Add a test for arena fault-in under memory.max From: "Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi" To: "Jiayuan Chen" , "Khawar Ahemad" , X-Mailer: aerc 0.21.0 References: <20260825094955.83240-5-ahemadkhawar123@gmail.com> <20260825104311.84038-1-ahemadkhawar123@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: On Tue Aug 25, 2026 at 1:19 PM CEST, Jiayuan Chen wrote: > > On 8/25/26 6:43 PM, Khawar Ahemad wrote: >> Addressing the three CI review comments on the v6 series: >> >> --- >> [Patch 4/4] max_entries comment >> --- >> >>> could the 50000 carry a short note that it just has to outrun >>> ARENA_BUDGET on the smallest page size >> Accepted. Will be fixed in v7 as a proper preceding block comment: >> >> /* >> * 50000 pages must exceed ARENA_BUDGET / PAGE_SIZE (64M / 4k =3D 163= 84) >> * so the fault loop hits memory.max before exhausting the arena itse= lf. >> */ >> __uint(max_entries, 50000); > > > Not that simple. > > It also make sure the arean not exceed 4G when page size is 64K. > > > --- > > Please don't submit further versions of this patchset. I have already > prepared a > > V6 (the one you sent), and I'm planning to send it myself. Additional > submissions > > from you would create unnecessary conflicts and confusion. > > > If you're interested in this series, I'd really appreciate your review > and feedback instead. Khawar, it's not acceptable to take someone else's patchset, and then spam = the list multiple times without their permission. If you continue doing this we= will have no choice but to redirect all your emails to spam. > > I'll also be sure to cc you on future versions. > I think that is unnecessary, I don't think Khawar is providing any meaningf= ul input for this.