From: "Alexei Starovoitov" <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
To: "Andrey Grodzovsky" <andrey.grodzovsky@crowdstrike.com>,
<bpf@vger.kernel.org>, <andrii@kernel.org>
Cc: <martin.kelly@crowdstrike.com>, <slava.imameev@crowdstrike.com>,
<linux-open-source@crowdstrike.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/7] libbpf: BPF program manual loading
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2026 01:37:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DLLGL0Q2REDU.3CMU5XBIMBWGC@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260921223937.3203093-1-andrey.grodzovsky@crowdstrike.com>
On Mon, Sep 21, 2026 at 06:39 PM Andrey Grodzovsky <andrey.grodzovsky@crowdstrike.com> wrote:
> after the initial bpf_object load. This v4 addresses all outstanding review
> feedback from v3's two CI bots, folds bpf_program__load_manually()/
> unload_manually() into a single load()/unload() naming pair, and adds
> a new patch that properly versions bpf_program__set_autoattach()'s
> ABI change instead of leaving it as a silent break for out-of-tree
> consumers (see changelog below).
What happened to the veristat conversion?
In v2 Andrii asked to try this in veristat to see whether it can replace
bpf_program__clone():
https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAEf4Bzaf9AMBUWQeUj1Uor8F7A-tOPpVMa-CjRB0MNH4zRHEeQ@mail.gmail.com/
and you replied that it builds and passes test_progs -t veristat.
Pls include that patch in the respin.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-22 1:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-21 22:39 [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/7] libbpf: BPF program manual loading Andrey Grodzovsky
2026-09-21 22:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/7] libbpf: BPF program load strategy enum Andrey Grodzovsky
2026-09-21 23:21 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-21 22:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 2/7] libbpf: BPF programs manual loading and attaching Andrey Grodzovsky
2026-09-21 23:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-22 23:51 ` Andrey Grodzovsky
2026-09-21 22:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 3/7] libbpf: Support declarative manual load via SEC("!...") prefix Andrey Grodzovsky
2026-09-21 23:12 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-21 23:21 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-09-21 22:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 4/7] libbpf: Reject gen_loader for objects with already-manual programs Andrey Grodzovsky
2026-09-21 22:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 5/7] libbpf: Version bpf_program__set_autoattach() ABI change Andrey Grodzovsky
2026-09-21 23:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-21 22:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 6/7] selftests/bpf: Cover BPF program load strategy transitions Andrey Grodzovsky
2026-09-21 23:37 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-21 22:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 7/7] selftests/bpf: Cover BPF program manual loading Andrey Grodzovsky
2026-09-22 1:37 ` Alexei Starovoitov [this message]
2026-09-22 14:34 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/7] libbpf: " Andrey Grodzovsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DLLGL0Q2REDU.3CMU5XBIMBWGC@gmail.com \
--to=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=andrey.grodzovsky@crowdstrike.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-open-source@crowdstrike.com \
--cc=martin.kelly@crowdstrike.com \
--cc=slava.imameev@crowdstrike.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox