BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Alexei Starovoitov" <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
To: <bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org>, <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <daniel@iogearbox.net>, <andrii@kernel.org>, <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
	<memxor@gmail.com>, <ast@kernel.org>, <martin.lau@kernel.org>,
	<yonghong.song@linux.dev>, <mason@kernel.org>,
	<ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: Test tracing_multi link with BTF ids of the same address
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2026 18:45:44 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DM28D0SAMO0S.1VTBTQHV699H@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d51031962737267f48d83c86738616656b3024c9c7bed42330c77b3c6936cae1@mail.kernel.org>

On Sun Oct 11, 2026 at 6:15 PM UTC, bot+bpf-ci wrote:
>> selftests/bpf: Test tracing_multi link with BTF ids of the same address
>
> TL;DR: Test nit only: the attach_same_addr subtest skips without printing a
> reason, so a SKIP is hard to interpret. A printf() before test__skip() could
> help, though the review says a bare skip may be acceptable.

...

> A subsystem pattern flags this skip as potentially concerning.  The
> selftests guide says to report a test that skips silently with no
> message.

bpf-ci... seriously?

humans and bots MUST not report nits.

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-11 18:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-11 16:48 [PATCH bpf-next 0/2] bpf: Reject BTF ids with the same address in tracing_multi link Alexei Starovoitov
2026-10-11 16:48 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] " Alexei Starovoitov
2026-10-11 16:48 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] selftests/bpf: Test tracing_multi link with BTF ids of the same address Alexei Starovoitov
2026-10-11 18:15   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-11 18:45     ` Alexei Starovoitov [this message]
2026-10-12  4:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next 0/2] bpf: Reject BTF ids with the same address in tracing_multi link Leon Hwang
2026-10-12  5:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2026-10-12  8:26   ` Leon Hwang
2026-10-12  8:45     ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2026-10-12  8:09 ` Jiri Olsa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DM28D0SAMO0S.1VTBTQHV699H@gmail.com \
    --to=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
    --cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
    --cc=mason@kernel.org \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox