From: "Alexei Starovoitov" <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
To: "Nathan Chancellor" <nathan@kernel.org>
Cc: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
<andrii@kernel.org>, <eddyz87@gmail.com>, <memxor@gmail.com>,
<yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 bpf-next 2/6] bpf, x86: Support unwind_goto and unwind_exit
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2026 22:10:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DMAUZ2HNWF7I.3MTUYUUN3E5JQ@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261021201456.GA3197963@ax162>
On Wed Oct 21, 2026 at 8:14 PM UTC, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> After this change landed in -next as commit cff94a3d78d8 ("bpf, x86:
> Support unwind_goto and unwind_exit"), I am seeing the following objtool
> warning when building with LLVM 23.1.4 and a recent tip of tree version
> of LLVM 24 with the attached configuration (which can become an error
> with CONFIG_OBJTOOL_WERROR):
>
> vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: do_jit+0x1330: relocation to !ENDBR: .text+0xc7fab
>
> Something like the below diff appears to inhibit this but I am not sure
> if it is too big of a hammer or if there is a better solution, hence
> just the report and deferring to you, but maybe it is a good starting
> point.
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> index d3ab36281144..b80f05f377c2 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> @@ -641,6 +641,7 @@ static int emit_patch(u8 **pprog, void *func, void *ip, u8 opcode)
>
> static int emit_call(u8 **pprog, void *func, void *ip)
> {
> + OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(func);
> return emit_patch(pprog, func, ip, 0xE8);
> }
Thanks for the report.
Sent a fix. Pls test it in your setup.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-21 22:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-20 18:13 [PATCH v4 bpf-next 0/6] bpf: Unwinding with unwind_goto and unwind_exit Alexei Starovoitov
2026-10-20 18:13 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 1/6] bpf: Add unwind_goto and unwind_exit insns Alexei Starovoitov
2026-10-20 18:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-20 20:04 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-10-20 18:13 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 2/6] bpf, x86: Support unwind_goto and unwind_exit Alexei Starovoitov
2026-10-20 18:55 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-20 18:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-21 20:14 ` Nathan Chancellor
2026-10-21 22:10 ` Alexei Starovoitov [this message]
2026-10-20 18:13 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 3/6] bpf, arm64: " Alexei Starovoitov
2026-10-20 18:55 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-10-20 18:13 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 4/6] selftests/bpf: Add tests for " Alexei Starovoitov
2026-10-20 18:13 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 5/6] selftests/bpf: Add a C++ prog with exceptions Alexei Starovoitov
2026-10-20 18:13 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 6/6] selftests/bpf: Test unwinding from R0:R2 subprog Alexei Starovoitov
2026-10-20 21:00 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 0/6] bpf: Unwinding with unwind_goto and unwind_exit patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DMAUZ2HNWF7I.3MTUYUUN3E5JQ@gmail.com \
--to=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox