From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=209.85.210.175 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1792635743; b=B4yturwF1pE7X9gdtSV7sW5mrVtauU6cLOU77UsW9tSfyRMA0dNxh0ebz9WT4O6m7F47 fPizlBsUQeoToelrTrums5+PhFeBVtxqADUeDUKqtxbt2tBizhD5dbtUCaPNpf3rsTcGG 0QxYzKzGJ+aG70wuAGwu9hbjAZR5gtXWPJqb+5swSLEjwo0cZSHtmluagt9eErpbQGUOX XGn+zAHJvEYUVuVhKV2s7jKsjfyxhKrssbZjgXfB4fVJKpp2BVaSiTQbqjEnIiBt+chAR vz//MiizlKqqRyQycew/h3n/j9mo0EfynIv+deHF+g1EbcfNQ5BIquHW4IftdrJjmMw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1792635743; h=DMARC-Filter:Received:DKIM-Signature:X-Google-DKIM-Signature: X-Forwarded-Encrypted:X-Gm-Message-State:X-Gm-Gg:X-Received:Received: Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Subject:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To: References:X-Mailer:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; bh=XxjX1g1mQUEUPhKLrpLxYSgZ8S+x7GSgwLX7BwyjX7g=; b=VbG0t/yW1BTCR63EacDcdHKvNmZM8FGB3t7l6wsfhCHyHwDCURC7U1iJ8Pgfm6T8Z5uH PgLY0jatkATaz5AJN3SEXPE8XovwcqSrvTf3hIw50sQvqMprtN7Qzdct92QFI96b0qgSJ 7U80oDAR5QiG0bJxYOZZLUNlcCoR8MGC1C2/XiDdWYTayvehTkoodgoWFPkHOG2PCXbI4 Jvsezvwfx3HLsx6gstEXMLRbr/XbY4zH+BHP7O3cnRfZYMFMTTvaIuVWwnMKXMElSxhk9 HVB4tRWBC0P8jYK+FqktZYJYRH5djbc0HC7hy0sVvkSNChRdqlGEdt10etIYGUW+eUg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20251104 header.b=sS0MesHX; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=209.85.210.175 Received: from mail-pf1-f175.google.com (mail-pf1-f175.google.com [209.85.210.175]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C01B606A31E for ; Thu, 22 Oct 2026 02:22:22 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 smtp.subspace.kernel.org 2C01B606A31E Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20251104 header.b=sS0MesHX Received: by mail-pf1-f175.google.com with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-8a070755c8cso673004b3a.0 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2026 19:22:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20251104; t=1792635742; x=1793240542; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:references:in-reply-to:cc:to :from:subject:message-id:date:content-type:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=XxjX1g1mQUEUPhKLrpLxYSgZ8S+x7GSgwLX7BwyjX7g=; b=sS0MesHX2nvWA2URY0k8Cne+sfJOI5PDPY0/f9zuTS95LHs/n/U9E8Pa4fzDUDcan+ Y9rcsec7bezD6Guv7ewLXhN25+qbv8/QYe+Nt37G/XwT4gtFsAw4dBx/scmdeSeprx8F yyYmOQOxj61oR9X1k4gckGNgfuwxjCdGgyxCQFj1M4GVJ4knVIsYp4O+Vpxpl2Ncu06y c78So+Vegffz8XffqmKkG/C++ukW6P3hjj0QtBPdRBMEZ3yxU/7oayY14RY5Y/KYxQ1q zYqw5lr40dCQEe9v04A1K2soetRjLIKPH5jCosRLRnOIYPu5etD6U75ESDrikvZjJQvJ nS8Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20260707; t=1792635742; x=1793240542; h=mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:references:in-reply-to:cc:to :from:subject:message-id:date:content-type:x-gm-gg :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to :content-type; bh=XxjX1g1mQUEUPhKLrpLxYSgZ8S+x7GSgwLX7BwyjX7g=; b=RsViUFejiIY4QGajXmAOZnxKZ7QjHkiRuLBJT13+VAaHOYS/XjaSmAC7eeWHEfELC8 1vISuf49IB2NcPG1QNOUnwPmtGejD/0cviCA/QIvmfCEZDUxOeZMsV1jqx5p1NHGR0Yz peSeCJGO8tf+XowcJU9yFsDzvVmrL8hJVhO2pONqr14n7Y8AGqOjJwBMvBU2pfJIQoj2 TN+/mKf3xhdsl51bHzMi4elHUW/KsuZgJ6z7DMfndBE52/9hLL2D+Y82lHHW6vP55ZSL 2jLa6VT838jlwNcXFVFspVnRlf38X1UjPSoNecDgIpLF7lHD+YntwgiQHjyaFNoaZS4Z ABxA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AKwUvBxQE5AwbjPCajWehaPwXSkByJTmPPiLt0vxdQXKC1XnrO4F3K+8EGHHqN6PMZCJjzwcqes=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AFq9FYI9JVllhgaoMkuhcy8O59n0ovYHU39MSj0ZNMB3L1YMWi4Ddb9z g4Hdwk0YHY7TGcKOyyaEExIDmZukNn6ljPqtvbkjgPEvK8fUNdGgvRU9 X-Gm-Gg: AYBFou1RYRIU96GZRoLHxSDuljm1vvqr2EEaJyn0Zn2gZW78I7IO7e3ngP5xJiqCLnP CIQ1Rf4VkuzcOekyL+smDv1pqfVGfnVUGuVJo7RbOM7cWpcVHKaHDCk55szQ+58KjINBGeaB2ea IWfQYyIsBSIL/9BEb5OSi1zC7FwiaLjcmxE5WLpQUPhE0ucGQquJgV8WxNiyExtJrWLlYEVxhw6 cHRjpm4HhNRoZzhIEMlVOENp5m/KUgXiPg7u6pF5LampPQHza1SIeDrM8VOILpv6jkR3j2cod3Y aSKWB8poR/NEVu4JvKx2ERpM0T99n8UkqFHf8C7c+XKxYd914TQYyGRkNi0Be5E4wmxIkUgKmKw r8bFH9xAkRWj/zoVBdxtL3RKxLIWcvzFg2TbKoirPDZuo69AtFFvJmUKnmJE/VGU27aNCxP0L/n tYCxQJhXlHM0T9CzA779gODwMCR2OOScTo5VuVgtp9/fuNkcJxTYOLckNIqxrl1dOmg22w5XiBP TbvxGkCw6hkGzDdZnOgUp12e5NlCvamV0S53p1VPLvv30RW7n/Rx9ZWc8dM93NCU4vq2CDs41cc 9iR2+IE/uEVKn1gQn9oFVumvr5fMMvbMk5xAWzfxWYiA+H8VYifyNLpLG0Vu X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:b49:b0:89f:37a0:b2cb with SMTP id d2e1a72fcca58-8a089eba62amr2905819b3a.49.1792635742236; Wed, 21 Oct 2026 19:22:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([153.61.198.248]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d2e1a72fcca58-8a0894b4206sm1450303b3a.18.2026.10.21.19.22.20 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 21 Oct 2026 19:22:21 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2026 02:22:20 +0000 Message-Id: Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 9/9] selftests/bpf: Test uprobes and fork() with busy mmap_lock From: "Alexei Starovoitov" To: , Cc: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , In-Reply-To: References: <20261022015712.1297331-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> <20261022015712.1297331-10-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> X-Mailer: mkdraft (claude review draft; edit before sending) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 On Wed, Oct 21, 2026 at 07:10 PM sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote: >> +#define AREA_MAX (64UL << 30) > > [ ... ] > >> + area = mmap(NULL, AREA_MAX, PROT_READ, MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS | MAP_NORESERVE, -1, 0); >> + if (area == MAP_FAILED) >> + goto err; > > [Severity: Medium] > In tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/uprobe_busy_mm.c, does AREA_MAX > overflow on 32-bit architectures when passed to mmap() in hold_mmap_lock()? > > Should AREA_MAX be sized appropriately for 32-bit architectures as well? No. uprobe_multi link is 64-bit only. bpf_uprobe_multi_link_attach() returns -EOPNOTSUPP on 32-bit and three of four subtests attach with it.