BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sdf@google.com
To: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org,
	daniel@iogearbox.net, kernel-team@fb.com, yhs@fb.com,
	kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] libbpf: hashmap.h update to fix build issues using LLVM14
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2022 09:19:36 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y26EKFAMfKPktLBd@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7253d4c4f2ffcd3bff90df8cf8f71af7475167de.camel@gmail.com>

On 11/11, Eduard Zingerman wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-11-10 at 17:34 -0800, sdf@google.com wrote:
> > On 11/10, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> > > On 11/11, Eduard Zingerman wrote:
> > > > A fix for the LLVM compilation error while building bpftool.
> > > > Replaces the expression:
> > > >
> > > >   _Static_assert((p) == NULL || ...)
> > > >
> > > > by expression:
> > > >
> > > >   _Static_assert((__builtin_constant_p((p)) ? (p) == NULL : 0) | 
> | ...)
> >
> > > IIUC, when __builtin_constant_p(p) returns false, we just ignore the  
> NULL
> > > check?
> > > Do we have cases like that? If no, maybe it's safer to fail?
> >
> > > s/(p) == NULL : 0/(p) == NULL : 1/ ?
> >
> > I'm probably missing something, can you pls clarify? So the error is as
> > follows:
> >
> > > > btf_dump.c:1546:2: error: static_assert expression is not an  
> integral
> > > > constant expression
> >     hashmap__find(name_map, orig_name, &dup_cnt);
> >     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >     ./hashmap.h:169:35: note: expanded from macro 'hashmap__find'
> >     hashmap_find((map), (long)(key), hashmap_cast_ptr(value))
> >     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >     ./hashmap.h:126:17: note: expanded from macro 'hashmap_cast_ptr'
> >     _Static_assert((p) == NULL || sizeof(*(p)) ==
> > sizeof(long),
> > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >     btf_dump.c:1546:2: note: cast from 'void *' is not allowed in a  
> constant
> > expression
> >     ./hashmap.h:169:35: note: expanded from macro 'hashmap__find'
> >     hashmap_find((map), (long)(key), hashmap_cast_ptr(value))
> >
> > This line in particular:
> >
> >     btf_dump.c:1546:2: note: cast from 'void *' is not allowed in a  
> constant
> > expression
> >
> > And the code does:
> >
> >    size_t dup_cnt = 0;
> >    hashmap__find(name_map, orig_name, &dup_cnt);
> >
> > So where is that cast from 'void *' is happening? Is it the NULL check
> > itself?
> >
> > Are we simply guarding against the user calling hashmap_cast_ptr with
> > explicit NULL argument?

> In case if (p) is not a constant I want the second part of the || to  
> kick-in.
> The complete condition looks as follows:

>    _Static_assert((__builtin_constant_p((p)) ? (p) == NULL : 0) || \
> 			sizeof(*(p)) == sizeof(long), "...error...")

> The intent is to check that (p) is either NULL or a pointer to
> something of size long. So, if (p) is not a constant the expression
> would be equivalent to:

>    _Static_assert(0 || sizeof(*(p)) == sizeof(long), "...error...")

> I just tried the following:

> 	struct hashmap *name_map;
> 	char x; // not a constant, wrong pointer size
> 	...
> 	hashmap__find(name_map, orig_name, &x);

> And it fails with an error message as intended:

> btf_dump.c:1548:2: error: static_assert failed due to  
> requirement '(__builtin_constant_p((&x)) ? (&x) == ((void *)0) : 0) ||  
> sizeof (*(&x)) == sizeof(long)' "&x pointee should be a long-sized  
> integer or a pointer"
>          hashmap__find(name_map, orig_name, &x);
> ./hashmap.h:170:35: note: expanded from macro 'hashmap__find'
>          hashmap_find((map), (long)(key), hashmap_cast_ptr(value))
> ./hashmap.h:126:2: note: expanded from macro 'hashmap_cast_ptr'
>          _Static_assert((__builtin_constant_p((p)) ? (p) == NULL : 0) ||

Awesome, thanks for clarifying!

Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>

> >
> > > > When "p" is not a constant the former is not considered to be a
> > > > constant expression by LLVM 14.
> > > >
> > > > The error was introduced in the following patch-set: [1].
> > > > The error was reported here: [2].
> > > >
> > > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
> > > >
> > > > [1]
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221109142611.879983-1-eddyz87@gmail.com/
> > > > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/202211110355.BcGcbZxP-lkp@intel.com/
> > > > ---
> > > >  tools/lib/bpf/hashmap.h   | 3 ++-
> > > >  tools/perf/util/hashmap.h | 3 ++-
> > > >  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/hashmap.h b/tools/lib/bpf/hashmap.h
> > > > index 3fe647477bad..0a5bf1937a7c 100644
> > > > --- a/tools/lib/bpf/hashmap.h
> > > > +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/hashmap.h
> > > > @@ -123,7 +123,8 @@ enum hashmap_insert_strategy {
> > > >  };
> > > >
> > > >  #define hashmap_cast_ptr(p) ({								\
> > > > -	_Static_assert((p) == NULL || sizeof(*(p)) == sizeof(long),			\
> > > > +	_Static_assert((__builtin_constant_p((p)) ? (p) == NULL : 0) ||			 
> \
> > > > +				sizeof(*(p)) == sizeof(long),				\
> > > >  		       #p " pointee should be a long-sized integer or a  
> pointer");	\
> > > >  	(long *)(p);									\
> > > >  })
> > > > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/hashmap.h b/tools/perf/util/hashmap.h
> > > > index 3fe647477bad..0a5bf1937a7c 100644
> > > > --- a/tools/perf/util/hashmap.h
> > > > +++ b/tools/perf/util/hashmap.h
> > > > @@ -123,7 +123,8 @@ enum hashmap_insert_strategy {
> > > >  };
> > > >
> > > >  #define hashmap_cast_ptr(p) ({								\
> > > > -	_Static_assert((p) == NULL || sizeof(*(p)) == sizeof(long),			\
> > > > +	_Static_assert((__builtin_constant_p((p)) ? (p) == NULL : 0) ||			 
> \
> > > > +				sizeof(*(p)) == sizeof(long),				\
> > > >  		       #p " pointee should be a long-sized integer or a  
> pointer");	\
> > > >  	(long *)(p);									\
> > > >  })
> > > > --
> > > > 2.34.1
> > > >


  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-11 17:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-10 22:32 [PATCH bpf-next] libbpf: hashmap.h update to fix build issues using LLVM14 Eduard Zingerman
2022-11-11  1:25 ` sdf
2022-11-11  1:34   ` sdf
2022-11-11  1:44     ` Eduard Zingerman
2022-11-11 17:19       ` sdf [this message]
2022-11-11 18:30         ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-11-11  1:51     ` Eduard Zingerman
2022-11-11 18:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y26EKFAMfKPktLBd@google.com \
    --to=sdf@google.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox