bpf.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Hao Sun <sunhao.th@gmail.com>, bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>, Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>,
	Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	KP Singh <kpsingh@chromium.org>,
	Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: Restrict attachment of bpf program to some tracepoints
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2022 10:35:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y4CMbTeVud0WfPtK@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAADnVQJ5knvWaxVa=9_Ag3DU_qewGBbHGv_ZH=K+ETUWM1qAmA@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 09:17:22AM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 1:42 AM Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 01:41:23AM +0100, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> > > On 11/21/22 10:31 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > > > We hit following issues [1] [2] when we attach bpf program that calls
> > > > bpf_trace_printk helper to the contention_begin tracepoint.
> > > >
> > > > As described in [3] with multiple bpf programs that call bpf_trace_printk
> > > > helper attached to the contention_begin might result in exhaustion of
> > > > printk buffer or cause a deadlock [2].
> > > >
> > > > There's also another possible deadlock when multiple bpf programs attach
> > > > to bpf_trace_printk tracepoint and call one of the printk bpf helpers.
> > > >
> > > > This change denies the attachment of bpf program to contention_begin
> > > > and bpf_trace_printk tracepoints if the bpf program calls one of the
> > > > printk bpf helpers.
> > > >
> > > > Adding also verifier check for tb_btf programs, so this can be cought
> > > > in program loading time with error message like:
> > > >
> > > >    Can't attach program with bpf_trace_printk#6 helper to contention_begin tracepoint.
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CACkBjsakT_yWxnSWr4r-0TpPvbKm9-OBmVUhJb7hV3hY8fdCkw@mail.gmail.com/
> > > > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CACkBjsaCsTovQHFfkqJKto6S4Z8d02ud1D7MPESrHa1cVNNTrw@mail.gmail.com/
> > > > [3] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/Y2j6ivTwFmA0FtvY@krava/
> > > >
> > > > Reported-by: Hao Sun <sunhao.th@gmail.com>
> > > > Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
> > > > ---
> > > >   include/linux/bpf.h          |  1 +
> > > >   include/linux/bpf_verifier.h |  2 ++
> > > >   kernel/bpf/syscall.c         |  3 +++
> > > >   kernel/bpf/verifier.c        | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > >   4 files changed, 52 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
> > > > index c9eafa67f2a2..3ccabede0f50 100644
> > > > --- a/include/linux/bpf.h
> > > > +++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
> > > > @@ -1319,6 +1319,7 @@ struct bpf_prog {
> > > >                             enforce_expected_attach_type:1, /* Enforce expected_attach_type checking at attach time */
> > > >                             call_get_stack:1, /* Do we call bpf_get_stack() or bpf_get_stackid() */
> > > >                             call_get_func_ip:1, /* Do we call get_func_ip() */
> > > > +                           call_printk:1, /* Do we call trace_printk/trace_vprintk  */
> > > >                             tstamp_type_access:1; /* Accessed __sk_buff->tstamp_type */
> > > >     enum bpf_prog_type      type;           /* Type of BPF program */
> > > >     enum bpf_attach_type    expected_attach_type; /* For some prog types */
> > > > diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
> > > > index 545152ac136c..7118c2fda59d 100644
> > > > --- a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
> > > > +++ b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
> > > > @@ -618,6 +618,8 @@ bool is_dynptr_type_expected(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
> > > >                          struct bpf_reg_state *reg,
> > > >                          enum bpf_arg_type arg_type);
> > > > +int bpf_check_tp_printk_denylist(const char *name, struct bpf_prog *prog);
> > > > +
> > > >   /* this lives here instead of in bpf.h because it needs to dereference tgt_prog */
> > > >   static inline u64 bpf_trampoline_compute_key(const struct bpf_prog *tgt_prog,
> > > >                                          struct btf *btf, u32 btf_id)
> > > > diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> > > > index 35972afb6850..9a69bda7d62b 100644
> > > > --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> > > > +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> > > > @@ -3329,6 +3329,9 @@ static int bpf_raw_tp_link_attach(struct bpf_prog *prog,
> > > >             return -EINVAL;
> > > >     }
> > > > +   if (bpf_check_tp_printk_denylist(tp_name, prog))
> > > > +           return -EACCES;
> > > > +
> > > >     btp = bpf_get_raw_tracepoint(tp_name);
> > > >     if (!btp)
> > > >             return -ENOENT;
> > > > diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> > > > index f07bec227fef..b662bc851e1c 100644
> > > > --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> > > > +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> > > > @@ -7472,6 +7472,47 @@ static void update_loop_inline_state(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 subprogno
> > > >                              state->callback_subprogno == subprogno);
> > > >   }
> > > > +int bpf_check_tp_printk_denylist(const char *name, struct bpf_prog *prog)
> > > > +{
> > > > +   static const char * const denylist[] = {
> > > > +           "contention_begin",
> > > > +           "bpf_trace_printk",
> > > > +   };
> > > > +   int i;
> > > > +
> > > > +   /* Do not allow attachment to denylist[] tracepoints,
> > > > +    * if the program calls some of the printk helpers,
> > > > +    * because there's possibility of deadlock.
> > > > +    */
> > >
> > > What if that prog doesn't but tail calls into another one which calls printk helpers?
> >
> > right, I'll deny that for all BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT* programs,
> > because I don't see easy way to check on that
> >
> > we can leave printk check for tracing BPF_TRACE_RAW_TP programs,
> > because verifier known the exact tracepoint already
> 
> This is all fragile and merely a stop gap.
> Doesn't sound that the issue is limited to bpf_trace_printk

hm, I don't have a better idea how to fix that.. I can't deny
contention_begin completely, because we use it in perf via
tp_btf/contention_begin (perf lock contention) and I don't
think there's another way for perf to do that

fwiw the last version below denies BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT
programs completely and tracing BPF_TRACE_RAW_TP with printks

with selftest:
  https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jolsa/perf.git/commit/?h=bpf/tp_deny_list&id=9a44d23187a699e6cd088d397f6801a1078361bc

we can add global tracepoint deny list if we see other issues in future

jirka


---
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
index 545152ac136c..7118c2fda59d 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
@@ -618,6 +618,8 @@ bool is_dynptr_type_expected(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 			     struct bpf_reg_state *reg,
 			     enum bpf_arg_type arg_type);
 
+int bpf_check_tp_printk_denylist(const char *name, struct bpf_prog *prog);
+
 /* this lives here instead of in bpf.h because it needs to dereference tgt_prog */
 static inline u64 bpf_trampoline_compute_key(const struct bpf_prog *tgt_prog,
 					     struct btf *btf, u32 btf_id)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index 35972afb6850..0ef1aaaf7a45 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -3324,6 +3324,9 @@ static int bpf_raw_tp_link_attach(struct bpf_prog *prog,
 			return -EFAULT;
 		buf[sizeof(buf) - 1] = 0;
 		tp_name = buf;
+
+		if (bpf_check_tp_printk_denylist(tp_name, prog))
+			return -EACCES;
 		break;
 	default:
 		return -EINVAL;
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 9528a066cfa5..847fdaa8a67b 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -7476,6 +7476,40 @@ static void update_loop_inline_state(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 subprogno
 				 state->callback_subprogno == subprogno);
 }
 
+int bpf_check_tp_printk_denylist(const char *name, struct bpf_prog *prog)
+{
+	static const char * const denylist[] = {
+		"contention_begin",
+		"bpf_trace_printk",
+	};
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(denylist); i++) {
+		if (!strcmp(denylist[i], name))
+			return 1;
+	}
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int check_tp_printk_denylist(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int func_id)
+{
+	struct bpf_prog *prog = env->prog;
+
+	if (prog->type != BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING ||
+	    prog->expected_attach_type != BPF_TRACE_RAW_TP)
+		return 0;
+
+	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!prog->aux->attach_func_name))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	if (!bpf_check_tp_printk_denylist(prog->aux->attach_func_name, prog))
+		return 0;
+
+	verbose(env, "Can't attach program with %s#%d helper to %s tracepoint.\n",
+		func_id_name(func_id), func_id, prog->aux->attach_func_name);
+	return -EACCES;
+}
+
 static int check_helper_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn,
 			     int *insn_idx_p)
 {
@@ -7679,6 +7713,10 @@ static int check_helper_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn
 		err = __check_func_call(env, insn, insn_idx_p, meta.subprogno,
 					set_user_ringbuf_callback_state);
 		break;
+	case BPF_FUNC_trace_printk:
+	case BPF_FUNC_trace_vprintk:
+		err = check_tp_printk_denylist(env, func_id);
+		break;
 	}
 
 	if (err)

  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-25  9:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-21 21:31 [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: Restrict attachment of bpf program to some tracepoints Jiri Olsa
2022-11-24  0:41 ` Daniel Borkmann
2022-11-24  9:42   ` Jiri Olsa
2022-11-24 17:17     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-11-25  9:35       ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2022-11-30 23:29         ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-12-03 17:58           ` Namhyung Kim
2022-12-05 12:28             ` Jiri Olsa
2022-12-06  4:00               ` Namhyung Kim
2022-12-06  8:14                 ` Jiri Olsa
2022-12-06 18:20                   ` Namhyung Kim
2022-12-06 20:09               ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-12-07  2:14                 ` Namhyung Kim
2022-12-07  5:23                   ` Hao Sun
2022-12-07 22:58                     ` Namhyung Kim
2022-12-07  8:18                   ` Jiri Olsa
2022-12-07 19:08                     ` Namhyung Kim
2022-12-08  6:15                       ` Namhyung Kim
2022-12-08 12:04                         ` Jiri Olsa
2022-12-04 21:44           ` Jiri Olsa
2022-12-07 13:39             ` Jiri Olsa
2022-12-07 19:10               ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-12-08  2:47               ` Hao Sun
2022-12-03 17:42       ` Namhyung Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y4CMbTeVud0WfPtK@krava \
    --to=olsajiri@gmail.com \
    --cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@chromium.org \
    --cc=sdf@google.com \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=sunhao.th@gmail.com \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).