From: Artem Savkov <asavkov@redhat.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@chromium.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/5] selftests/bpf: Move kfunc exports to bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2023 11:31:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y9EFAqdLED3TT43M@samus.usersys.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230124143626.250719-2-jolsa@kernel.org>
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 03:36:22PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> Move all kfunc exports into separate header file and include it
> in tests that need it.
>
> We will move all test kfuncs into bpf_testmod in following change,
> so it's convenient to have declarations in single place.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
> ---
> .../bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h | 89 +++++++++++++++++++
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cb_refs.c | 1 +
> .../selftests/bpf/progs/jit_probe_mem.c | 3 +-
> .../bpf/progs/kfunc_call_destructive.c | 3 +-
> .../selftests/bpf/progs/kfunc_call_fail.c | 9 +-
> .../selftests/bpf/progs/kfunc_call_race.c | 3 +-
> .../selftests/bpf/progs/kfunc_call_test.c | 15 +---
> .../bpf/progs/kfunc_call_test_subprog.c | 17 +++-
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/map_kptr.c | 1 +
> .../selftests/bpf/progs/map_kptr_fail.c | 1 +
> 10 files changed, 111 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..41d4f8543a25
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +
> +#ifndef _BPF_TESTMOD_KFUNC_H
> +#define _BPF_TESTMOD_KFUNC_H
> +
> +#ifndef __ksym
> +#define __ksym __attribute__((section(".ksyms")))
> +#endif
...
> +extern void bpf_kfunc_call_test_pass_ctx(struct __sk_buff *skb) __ksym;
> +extern void bpf_kfunc_call_test_pass1(struct prog_test_pass1 *p) __ksym;
> +extern void bpf_kfunc_call_test_pass2(struct prog_test_pass2 *p) __ksym;
> +extern void bpf_kfunc_call_test_mem_len_fail2(__u64 *mem, int len) __ksym;
> +
> +extern void bpf_kfunc_call_test_destructive(void) __ksym;
> +
> +#endif /* _BPF_TESTMOD_KFUNC_H */
This is missing bpf_kfunc_call_test_kptr_get() prototype, the function is
moved with the rest in the 5th patch.
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cb_refs.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cb_refs.c
> index 7653df1bc787..b905833dc9d3 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cb_refs.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/cb_refs.c
> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
> #include <vmlinux.h>
> #include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
> #include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
> +#include "bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h"
>
> struct map_value {
> struct prog_test_ref_kfunc __kptr_ref *ptr;
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/map_kptr.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/map_kptr.c
> index eb8217803493..753305c22c2f 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/map_kptr.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/map_kptr.c
> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
> #include <vmlinux.h>
> #include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
> #include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
> +#include "bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h"
>
> struct map_value {
> struct prog_test_ref_kfunc __kptr *unref_ptr;
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/map_kptr_fail.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/map_kptr_fail.c
> index 760e41e1a632..3b5076d951df 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/map_kptr_fail.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/map_kptr_fail.c
> @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
> #include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
> #include <bpf/bpf_core_read.h>
> #include "bpf_misc.h"
> +#include "bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h"
>
> struct map_value {
> char buf[8];
These three are missing old prototype removal.
--
Artem
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-25 10:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-24 14:36 [PATCH bpf-next 0/5] bpf: Move kernel test kfuncs into bpf_testmod Jiri Olsa
2023-01-24 14:36 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/5] selftests/bpf: Move kfunc exports to bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod_kfunc.h Jiri Olsa
2023-01-25 10:31 ` Artem Savkov [this message]
2023-01-25 21:33 ` Jiri Olsa
2023-01-24 14:36 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/5] selftests/bpf: Move test_progs helpers to testing_helpers object Jiri Olsa
2023-01-24 14:36 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/5] selftests/bpf: Load bpf_testmod for verifier test Jiri Olsa
2023-01-24 14:36 ` [PATCH bpf-next 4/5] selftests/bpf: Allow to use kfunc from testmod.ko in test_verifier Jiri Olsa
2023-01-24 14:36 ` [PATCH bpf-next 5/5] bpf: Move kernel test kfuncs to bpf_testmod Jiri Olsa
2023-01-25 3:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next 0/5] bpf: Move kernel test kfuncs into bpf_testmod Alexei Starovoitov
2023-01-25 7:41 ` Jiri Olsa
2023-01-26 14:45 ` Jiri Olsa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y9EFAqdLED3TT43M@samus.usersys.redhat.com \
--to=asavkov@redhat.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=kpsingh@chromium.org \
--cc=sdf@google.com \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox