From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
Cc: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
kernel-team@fb.com, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4] bpf: fix NULL pointer dereference in bpf_get_local_storage() helper
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2021 12:50:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YF3KgXsWjqOpM/dA@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3a2052e8-eb4b-fefc-4a0c-ad051b5609d0@fb.com>
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 06:38:54PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On 3/22/21 10:51 PM, Yonghong Song wrote:
> > Jiri Olsa reported a bug ([1]) in kernel where cgroup local
> > storage pointer may be NULL in bpf_get_local_storage() helper.
> > There are two issues uncovered by this bug:
> > (1). kprobe or tracepoint prog incorrectly sets cgroup local storage
> > before prog run,
> > (2). due to change from preempt_disable to migrate_disable,
> > preemption is possible and percpu storage might be overwritten
> > by other tasks.
> >
> > This issue (1) is fixed in [2]. This patch tried to address issue (2).
> > The following shows how things can go wrong:
> > task 1: bpf_cgroup_storage_set() for percpu local storage
> > preemption happens
> > task 2: bpf_cgroup_storage_set() for percpu local storage
> > preemption happens
> > task 1: run bpf program
> >
> > task 1 will effectively use the percpu local storage setting by task 2
> > which will be either NULL or incorrect ones.
> >
> > Instead of just one common local storage per cpu, this patch fixed
> > the issue by permitting 8 local storages per cpu and each local
> > storage is identified by a task_struct pointer. This way, we
> > allow at most 8 nested preemption between bpf_cgroup_storage_set()
> > and bpf_cgroup_storage_unset(). The percpu local storage slot
> > is released (calling bpf_cgroup_storage_unset()) by the same task
> > after bpf program finished running.
> > bpf_test_run() is also fixed to use the new bpf_cgroup_storage_set()
> > interface.
> >
> > The patch is tested on top of [2] with reproducer in [1].
> > Without this patch, kernel will emit error in 2-3 minutes.
> > With this patch, after one hour, still no error.
> >
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAKH8qBuXCfUz=w8L+Fj74OaUpbosO29niYwTki7e3Ag044_aww@mail.gmail.com/T
> > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210309185028.3763817-1-yhs@fb.com
> >
> > Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
> > Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
>
> Applied to bpf-next. Thanks
>
sorry for late reply, FWIW I dont see the issue anymore with the patch
thanks,
jirka
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-26 11:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-23 5:51 [PATCH bpf-next v4] bpf: fix NULL pointer dereference in bpf_get_local_storage() helper Yonghong Song
2021-03-26 1:38 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2021-03-26 11:50 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YF3KgXsWjqOpM/dA@krava \
--to=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=ast@fb.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox