BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>, Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>,
	Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	KP Singh <kpsingh@chromium.org>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next] selftest/bpf: Switch recursion test to use htab_map_delete_elem
Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2021 18:49:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YVnfFTL/3T6jOwHI@krava> (raw)

Currently the recursion test is hooking __htab_map_lookup_elem
function, which is invoked both from bpf_prog and bpf syscall.

But in our kernel build, the __htab_map_lookup_elem gets inlined
within the htab_map_lookup_elem, so it's not trigered and the
test fails.

Fixing this by using htab_map_delete_elem, which is not inlined
for bpf_prog calls (like htab_map_lookup_elem is) and is used
directly as pointer for map_delete_elem, so it won't disappear
by inlining.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/recursion.c | 10 +++++-----
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/recursion.c      |  9 +++------
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/recursion.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/recursion.c
index 0e378d63fe18..f3af2627b599 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/recursion.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/recursion.c
@@ -20,18 +20,18 @@ void test_recursion(void)
 		goto out;
 
 	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->pass1, 0, "pass1 == 0");
-	bpf_map_lookup_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.hash1), &key, 0);
+	bpf_map_delete_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.hash1), &key);
 	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->pass1, 1, "pass1 == 1");
-	bpf_map_lookup_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.hash1), &key, 0);
+	bpf_map_delete_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.hash1), &key);
 	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->pass1, 2, "pass1 == 2");
 
 	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->pass2, 0, "pass2 == 0");
-	bpf_map_lookup_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.hash2), &key, 0);
+	bpf_map_delete_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.hash2), &key);
 	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->pass2, 1, "pass2 == 1");
-	bpf_map_lookup_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.hash2), &key, 0);
+	bpf_map_delete_elem(bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.hash2), &key);
 	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->pass2, 2, "pass2 == 2");
 
-	err = bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd(bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.on_lookup),
+	err = bpf_obj_get_info_by_fd(bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.on_delete),
 				     &prog_info, &prog_info_len);
 	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "get_prog_info"))
 		goto out;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/recursion.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/recursion.c
index 49f679375b9d..3c2423bb19e2 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/recursion.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/recursion.c
@@ -24,8 +24,8 @@ struct {
 int pass1 = 0;
 int pass2 = 0;
 
-SEC("fentry/__htab_map_lookup_elem")
-int BPF_PROG(on_lookup, struct bpf_map *map)
+SEC("fentry/htab_map_delete_elem")
+int BPF_PROG(on_delete, struct bpf_map *map)
 {
 	int key = 0;
 
@@ -35,10 +35,7 @@ int BPF_PROG(on_lookup, struct bpf_map *map)
 	}
 	if (map == (void *)&hash2) {
 		pass2++;
-		/* htab_map_gen_lookup() will inline below call
-		 * into direct call to __htab_map_lookup_elem()
-		 */
-		bpf_map_lookup_elem(&hash2, &key);
+		bpf_map_delete_elem(&hash2, &key);
 		return 0;
 	}
 
-- 
2.31.1


             reply	other threads:[~2021-10-03 16:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-03 16:49 Jiri Olsa [this message]
2021-10-04 17:38 ` [PATCH bpf-next] selftest/bpf: Switch recursion test to use htab_map_delete_elem Song Liu
2021-10-06 17:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YVnfFTL/3T6jOwHI@krava \
    --to=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=andriin@fb.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@chromium.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox