From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9417AC433EF for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2021 08:33:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74D416112D for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2021 08:33:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232099AbhJVIgH (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Oct 2021 04:36:07 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58624 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231984AbhJVIgH (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Oct 2021 04:36:07 -0400 Received: from desiato.infradead.org (desiato.infradead.org [IPv6:2001:8b0:10b:1:d65d:64ff:fe57:4e05]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A17AC061764; Fri, 22 Oct 2021 01:33:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=desiato.20200630; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=BKRfgbYmOOsvcoj4JpPtR+W/t5uf0jYICwx+zjBD2hE=; b=DU/nbmq7hazCDHsgFDmXyJN5vh f0q9gcfoxsf+74dSRH/Ur/1n0ZhjWIwdrkdDKsDblEvlRMdhhOLoP2P0/El+YBCCUFgxAJDUe+Y9k YN5/0qXEBgZovDnjRoaI4eTMKL8RtdLvQxQW7sERw/9UgRjkcDIsaHNaW9TqwRpecVrCvOnBQayYL ZBMsgXfbmnhqky9GnESCz6UbhePos0uMFKib8DEUhY8AJgv2e/d3D+xY3JVwe3JG5e92sfXrKPsLb PNoy2My0cRp9QBUYLPTDVeomw2Xo5Bq2CvY6j3fXUhtS9ThsYaGDJ2+yTfv+PfbsqhDVnk/EIXUyT xlL3jGyQ==; Received: from j217100.upc-j.chello.nl ([24.132.217.100] helo=noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net) by desiato.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1mdpzW-00BXp0-JD; Fri, 22 Oct 2021 08:33:30 +0000 Received: from hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net (hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net [192.168.1.225]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B02433002BC; Fri, 22 Oct 2021 10:33:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: by hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 967D42CCDF6C8; Fri, 22 Oct 2021 10:33:28 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2021 10:33:28 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Zvi Effron Cc: Alexei Starovoitov , x86@kernel.org, jpoimboe@redhat.com, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ndesaulniers@google.com, Daniel Borkmann , bpf , Andrii Nakryiko Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 14/14] bpf,x86: Respect X86_FEATURE_RETPOLINE* Message-ID: References: <20211020104442.021802560@infradead.org> <20211020105843.345016338@infradead.org> <20211021000502.ltn5o6ji6offwzeg@ast-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 04:51:08PM -0700, Zvi Effron wrote: > > What's a patchwork and where do I find it? > > > > Patchwork[0] tracks the status of patches from submission through to merge (and > beyond?). Yeah, I sorta know that :-) Even though I loathe the things because web-browser, but the second part of the question was genuine, there's a *lot* of patchwork instances around, not everyone uses the new k.org based one.