From: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
Cc: bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] bpf: selftests: get rid of CHECK macro in xdp_bpf2bpf.c
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2022 22:53:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YeiIb3IkSl90BuaF@lore-desk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEf4BzZVYLGHX1zexH0wuAXD_OLAA3Kv2LSi7eCQNw=VS1B0ZA@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5857 bytes --]
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 8:58 AM Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Rely on ASSERT* macros and get rid of deprecated CHECK ones in
> > xdp_bpf2bpf bpf selftest.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_bpf2bpf.c | 43 ++++++++-----------
> > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_bpf2bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_bpf2bpf.c
> > index c98a897ad692..951ce1fc535d 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_bpf2bpf.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_bpf2bpf.c
> > @@ -12,25 +12,21 @@ struct meta {
> >
> > static void on_sample(void *ctx, int cpu, void *data, __u32 size)
> > {
> > - int duration = 0;
> > struct meta *meta = (struct meta *)data;
> > struct ipv4_packet *trace_pkt_v4 = data + sizeof(*meta);
> >
> > - if (CHECK(size < sizeof(pkt_v4) + sizeof(*meta),
> > - "check_size", "size %u < %zu\n",
> > - size, sizeof(pkt_v4) + sizeof(*meta)))
> > + if (!ASSERT_GE(size, sizeof(pkt_v4) + sizeof(*meta), "check_size"))
> > return;
> >
> > - if (CHECK(meta->ifindex != if_nametoindex("lo"), "check_meta_ifindex",
> > - "meta->ifindex = %d\n", meta->ifindex))
> > + if (!ASSERT_EQ(meta->ifindex, if_nametoindex("lo"),
> > + "check_meta_ifindex"))
> > return;
> >
> > - if (CHECK(meta->pkt_len != sizeof(pkt_v4), "check_meta_pkt_len",
> > - "meta->pkt_len = %zd\n", sizeof(pkt_v4)))
> > + if (!ASSERT_EQ(meta->pkt_len, sizeof(pkt_v4), "check_meta_pkt_len"))
> > return;
> >
> > - if (CHECK(memcmp(trace_pkt_v4, &pkt_v4, sizeof(pkt_v4)),
> > - "check_packet_content", "content not the same\n"))
> > + if (!ASSERT_EQ(memcmp(trace_pkt_v4, &pkt_v4, sizeof(pkt_v4)),
> > + 0, "check_packet_content"))
> > return;
> >
>
> we can simplify and make it easier to follow by not doing early
> returns. Just a sequence of ASSERTs would be compact and nice.
ack, fine. I will fix it in v2.
>
> > *(bool *)ctx = true;
> > @@ -52,7 +48,7 @@ void test_xdp_bpf2bpf(void)
> >
> > /* Load XDP program to introspect */
> > pkt_skel = test_xdp__open_and_load();
> > - if (CHECK(!pkt_skel, "pkt_skel_load", "test_xdp skeleton failed\n"))
> > + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(pkt_skel, "test_xdp__open_and_load"))
> > return;
> >
> > pkt_fd = bpf_program__fd(pkt_skel->progs._xdp_tx_iptunnel);
> > @@ -62,7 +58,7 @@ void test_xdp_bpf2bpf(void)
> >
> > /* Load trace program */
> > ftrace_skel = test_xdp_bpf2bpf__open();
> > - if (CHECK(!ftrace_skel, "__open", "ftrace skeleton failed\n"))
> > + if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(ftrace_skel, "test_xdp_bpf2bpf__open"))
> > goto out;
> >
> > /* Demonstrate the bpf_program__set_attach_target() API rather than
> > @@ -77,11 +73,11 @@ void test_xdp_bpf2bpf(void)
> > bpf_program__set_attach_target(prog, pkt_fd, "_xdp_tx_iptunnel");
> >
> > err = test_xdp_bpf2bpf__load(ftrace_skel);
> > - if (CHECK(err, "__load", "ftrace skeleton failed\n"))
> > + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "test_xdp_bpf2bpf__load"))
> > goto out;
> >
> > err = test_xdp_bpf2bpf__attach(ftrace_skel);
> > - if (CHECK(err, "ftrace_attach", "ftrace attach failed: %d\n", err))
> > + if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "test_xdp_bpf2bpf__attach"))
> > goto out;
> >
> > /* Set up perf buffer */
> > @@ -94,30 +90,25 @@ void test_xdp_bpf2bpf(void)
> > err = bpf_prog_test_run(pkt_fd, 1, &pkt_v4, sizeof(pkt_v4),
> > buf, &size, &retval, &duration);
> > memcpy(&iph, buf + sizeof(struct ethhdr), sizeof(iph));
> > - if (CHECK(err || retval != XDP_TX || size != 74 ||
> > - iph.protocol != IPPROTO_IPIP, "ipv4",
> > - "err %d errno %d retval %d size %d\n",
> > - err, errno, retval, size))
> > + if (!ASSERT_OK(err || retval != XDP_TX || size != 74 ||
> > + iph.protocol != IPPROTO_IPIP, "ipv4"))
> > goto out;
> >
> > /* Make sure bpf_xdp_output() was triggered and it sent the expected
> > * data to the perf ring buffer.
> > */
> > err = perf_buffer__poll(pb, 100);
> > - if (CHECK(err < 0, "perf_buffer__poll", "err %d\n", err))
> > + if (!ASSERT_GE(err, 0, "perf_buffer__poll"))
> > goto out;
> >
> > - CHECK_FAIL(!passed);
> > + ASSERT_TRUE(passed, "test passed");
> >
> > /* Verify test results */
> > - if (CHECK(ftrace_skel->bss->test_result_fentry != if_nametoindex("lo"),
> > - "result", "fentry failed err %llu\n",
> > - ftrace_skel->bss->test_result_fentry))
> > + if (!ASSERT_EQ(ftrace_skel->bss->test_result_fentry, if_nametoindex("lo"),
> > + "fentry result"))
> > goto out;
> >
> > - CHECK(ftrace_skel->bss->test_result_fexit != XDP_TX, "result",
> > - "fexit failed err %llu\n", ftrace_skel->bss->test_result_fexit);
> > -
> > + ASSERT_EQ(ftrace_skel->bss->test_result_fexit, XDP_TX, "fexit result");
> > out:
> > if (pb)
>
> while at it, please drop this if. perf_buffer__free() handles NULLs
> and error pointers.
ack, fine. I will fix it in v2.
Regards,
Lorenzo
>
> > perf_buffer__free(pb);
> > --
> > 2.34.1
> >
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-19 21:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-19 16:58 [PATCH bpf-next 0/2] rely on ASSERT marcos in xdp_bpf2bpf.c/xdp_adjust_tail.c Lorenzo Bianconi
2022-01-19 16:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] bpf: selftests: get rid of CHECK macro in xdp_adjust_tail.c Lorenzo Bianconi
2022-01-19 18:52 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-01-19 21:54 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2022-01-19 16:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] bpf: selftests: get rid of CHECK macro in xdp_bpf2bpf.c Lorenzo Bianconi
2022-01-19 18:54 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-01-19 21:53 ` Lorenzo Bianconi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YeiIb3IkSl90BuaF@lore-desk \
--to=lorenzo@kernel.org \
--cc=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).