From: sdf@google.com
To: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
ast@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v1] bpf: Tidy up verifier check_func_arg()
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 15:44:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Ys35McCz+TZEdorp@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220712210603.123791-1-joannelkoong@gmail.com>
On 07/12, Joanne Koong wrote:
> This patch does two things:
> 1. For matching against the arg type, the match should be against the
> base type of the arg type, since the arg type can have different
> bpf_type_flags set on it.
Does this need a fixes tag? Something around the following maybe:
Fixes: d639b9d13a39 ("bpf: Introduce composable reg, ret and arg types.")
?
> 2. Uses switch casing to improve readability + efficiency.
> Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
> ---
> kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> index 328cfab3af60..26e7e787c20a 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> @@ -5533,17 +5533,6 @@ static bool arg_type_is_mem_size(enum bpf_arg_type
> type)
> type == ARG_CONST_SIZE_OR_ZERO;
> }
> -static bool arg_type_is_alloc_size(enum bpf_arg_type type)
> -{
> - return type == ARG_CONST_ALLOC_SIZE_OR_ZERO;
> -}
> -
> -static bool arg_type_is_int_ptr(enum bpf_arg_type type)
> -{
> - return type == ARG_PTR_TO_INT ||
> - type == ARG_PTR_TO_LONG;
> -}
> -
> static bool arg_type_is_release(enum bpf_arg_type type)
> {
> return type & OBJ_RELEASE;
> @@ -5929,7 +5918,8 @@ static int check_func_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env
> *env, u32 arg,
> meta->ref_obj_id = reg->ref_obj_id;
> }
> - if (arg_type == ARG_CONST_MAP_PTR) {
> + switch (base_type(arg_type)) {
> + case ARG_CONST_MAP_PTR:
> /* bpf_map_xxx(map_ptr) call: remember that map_ptr */
> if (meta->map_ptr) {
> /* Use map_uid (which is unique id of inner map) to reject:
> @@ -5954,7 +5944,8 @@ static int check_func_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env
> *env, u32 arg,
> }
> meta->map_ptr = reg->map_ptr;
> meta->map_uid = reg->map_uid;
> - } else if (arg_type == ARG_PTR_TO_MAP_KEY) {
> + break;
> + case ARG_PTR_TO_MAP_KEY:
> /* bpf_map_xxx(..., map_ptr, ..., key) call:
> * check that [key, key + map->key_size) are within
> * stack limits and initialized
> @@ -5971,7 +5962,8 @@ static int check_func_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env
> *env, u32 arg,
> err = check_helper_mem_access(env, regno,
> meta->map_ptr->key_size, false,
> NULL);
> - } else if (base_type(arg_type) == ARG_PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE) {
> + break;
> + case ARG_PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE:
> if (type_may_be_null(arg_type) && register_is_null(reg))
> return 0;
> @@ -5987,14 +5979,16 @@ static int check_func_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env
> *env, u32 arg,
> err = check_helper_mem_access(env, regno,
> meta->map_ptr->value_size, false,
> meta);
> - } else if (arg_type == ARG_PTR_TO_PERCPU_BTF_ID) {
> + break;
> + case ARG_PTR_TO_PERCPU_BTF_ID:
> if (!reg->btf_id) {
> verbose(env, "Helper has invalid btf_id in R%d\n", regno);
> return -EACCES;
> }
> meta->ret_btf = reg->btf;
> meta->ret_btf_id = reg->btf_id;
> - } else if (arg_type == ARG_PTR_TO_SPIN_LOCK) {
> + break;
> + case ARG_PTR_TO_SPIN_LOCK:
> if (meta->func_id == BPF_FUNC_spin_lock) {
> if (process_spin_lock(env, regno, true))
> return -EACCES;
> @@ -6005,12 +5999,15 @@ static int check_func_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env
> *env, u32 arg,
> verbose(env, "verifier internal error\n");
> return -EFAULT;
> }
> - } else if (arg_type == ARG_PTR_TO_TIMER) {
> + break;
> + case ARG_PTR_TO_TIMER:
> if (process_timer_func(env, regno, meta))
> return -EACCES;
> - } else if (arg_type == ARG_PTR_TO_FUNC) {
> + break;
> + case ARG_PTR_TO_FUNC:
> meta->subprogno = reg->subprogno;
> - } else if (base_type(arg_type) == ARG_PTR_TO_MEM) {
> + break;
> + case ARG_PTR_TO_MEM:
> /* The access to this pointer is only checked when we hit the
> * next is_mem_size argument below.
> */
> @@ -6020,11 +6017,14 @@ static int check_func_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env
> *env, u32 arg,
> fn->arg_size[arg], false,
> meta);
> }
> - } else if (arg_type_is_mem_size(arg_type)) {
> - bool zero_size_allowed = (arg_type == ARG_CONST_SIZE_OR_ZERO);
> -
> - err = check_mem_size_reg(env, reg, regno, zero_size_allowed, meta);
> - } else if (arg_type_is_dynptr(arg_type)) {
> + break;
> + case ARG_CONST_SIZE:
> + err = check_mem_size_reg(env, reg, regno, false, meta);
> + break;
> + case ARG_CONST_SIZE_OR_ZERO:
> + err = check_mem_size_reg(env, reg, regno, true, meta);
> + break;
> + case ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTR:
> if (arg_type & MEM_UNINIT) {
> if (!is_dynptr_reg_valid_uninit(env, reg)) {
> verbose(env, "Dynptr has to be an uninitialized dynptr\n");
> @@ -6058,21 +6058,28 @@ static int check_func_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env
> *env, u32 arg,
> err_extra, arg + 1);
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> - } else if (arg_type_is_alloc_size(arg_type)) {
> + break;
> + case ARG_CONST_ALLOC_SIZE_OR_ZERO:
> if (!tnum_is_const(reg->var_off)) {
> verbose(env, "R%d is not a known constant'\n",
> regno);
> return -EACCES;
> }
> meta->mem_size = reg->var_off.value;
> - } else if (arg_type_is_int_ptr(arg_type)) {
> + break;
> + case ARG_PTR_TO_INT:
> + case ARG_PTR_TO_LONG:
> + {
> int size = int_ptr_type_to_size(arg_type);
> err = check_helper_mem_access(env, regno, size, false, meta);
> if (err)
> return err;
> err = check_ptr_alignment(env, reg, 0, size, true);
> - } else if (arg_type == ARG_PTR_TO_CONST_STR) {
> + break;
> + }
> + case ARG_PTR_TO_CONST_STR:
> + {
> struct bpf_map *map = reg->map_ptr;
> int map_off;
> u64 map_addr;
> @@ -6111,9 +6118,12 @@ static int check_func_arg(struct bpf_verifier_env
> *env, u32 arg,
> verbose(env, "string is not zero-terminated\n");
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> - } else if (arg_type == ARG_PTR_TO_KPTR) {
> + break;
> + }
> + case ARG_PTR_TO_KPTR:
> if (process_kptr_func(env, regno, meta))
> return -EACCES;
> + break;
> }
> return err;
> --
> 2.30.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-12 22:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-12 21:06 [PATCH bpf-next v1] bpf: Tidy up verifier check_func_arg() Joanne Koong
2022-07-12 22:44 ` sdf [this message]
2022-07-13 1:10 ` Joanne Koong
2022-07-13 1:20 ` Hao Luo
2022-07-13 1:25 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-07-13 1:38 ` Hao Luo
2022-07-13 2:10 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-07-13 20:09 ` Joanne Koong
2022-07-13 21:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Ys35McCz+TZEdorp@google.com \
--to=sdf@google.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=joannelkoong@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox