From: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com>
To: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH bpf-next 4/7] bpf: x86: Support in-register struct arguments
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2022 13:10:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YuPALUYnHcZ1drB5@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220726171151.712242-1-yhs@fb.com>
On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 10:11:51AM -0700, Yonghong Song wrote:
SNIP
>
> -static void restore_regs(const struct btf_func_model *m, u8 **prog, int nr_args,
> - int regs_off)
> +static void __save_struct_arg_regs(u8 **prog, int curr_reg_idx, int nr_regs,
> + int struct_val_off, int stack_start_idx)
> {
> - int i;
> + int i, reg_idx;
> +
> + /* Save struct registers to stack.
> + * For example, argument 1 (second argument) size is 16 which occupies two
> + * registers, these two register values will be saved in stack.
> + * mov QWORD PTR [rbp-0x40],rsi
> + * mov QWORD PTR [rbp-0x38],rdx
> + */
> + for (i = 0; i < nr_regs; i++) {
> + reg_idx = curr_reg_idx + i;
> + emit_stx(prog, bytes_to_bpf_size(8),
> + BPF_REG_FP,
> + reg_idx == 5 ? X86_REG_R9 : BPF_REG_1 + reg_idx,
> + -(struct_val_off - stack_start_idx * 8));
> + stack_start_idx++;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static void save_regs(const struct btf_func_model *m, u8 **prog, int nr_args,
> + int regs_off, int struct_val_off)
> +{
> + int curr_arg_idx, curr_reg_idx, curr_s_stack_off;
> + int s_size, s_arg_idx, s_arg_nregs;
> +
> + curr_arg_idx = curr_reg_idx = curr_s_stack_off = 0;
> + for (int i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_FUNC_STRUCT_ARGS; i++) {
> + s_size = m->struct_arg_bsize[i];
> + if (!s_size)
> + return __save_normal_arg_regs(m, prog, curr_arg_idx, nr_args - curr_arg_idx,
> + curr_reg_idx, regs_off);
could we just do break in here instead?
SNIP
> +
> +static void restore_regs(const struct btf_func_model *m, u8 **prog, int nr_args,
> + int regs_off, int struct_val_off)
> +{
> + int curr_arg_idx, curr_reg_idx, curr_s_stack_off;
> + int s_size, s_arg_idx, s_arg_nregs;
> +
> + curr_arg_idx = curr_reg_idx = curr_s_stack_off = 0;
> + for (int i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_FUNC_STRUCT_ARGS; i++) {
> + s_size = m->struct_arg_bsize[i];
> + if (!s_size)
> + return __restore_normal_arg_regs(m, prog, curr_arg_idx,
> + nr_args - curr_arg_idx,
> + curr_reg_idx, regs_off);
same here
jirka
> +
> + s_arg_idx = m->struct_arg_idx[i];
> + s_arg_nregs = (s_size + 7) / 8;
> +
> + __restore_normal_arg_regs(m, prog, curr_arg_idx, s_arg_idx - curr_arg_idx,
> + curr_reg_idx, regs_off);
> + __restore_struct_arg_regs(prog, curr_reg_idx + s_arg_idx - curr_arg_idx,
> + s_arg_nregs, struct_val_off, curr_s_stack_off);
> + curr_reg_idx += s_arg_idx - curr_arg_idx + s_arg_nregs;
> + curr_s_stack_off += s_arg_nregs;
> + curr_arg_idx = s_arg_idx + 1;
> + }
> +
> + __restore_normal_arg_regs(m, prog, curr_arg_idx, nr_args - curr_arg_idx, curr_reg_idx,
> + regs_off);
> }
>
SNIP
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-29 11:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-26 17:11 [RFC PATCH bpf-next 0/7] bpf: Support struct value argument for trampoline base progs Yonghong Song
2022-07-26 17:11 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next 1/7] bpf: Always return corresponding btf_type in __get_type_size() Yonghong Song
2022-07-26 17:11 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next 2/7] bpf: Add struct argument info in btf_func_model Yonghong Song
2022-08-09 0:02 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-08-09 17:38 ` Yonghong Song
2022-08-10 0:25 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-08-11 6:24 ` Yonghong Song
2022-07-26 17:11 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next 3/7] bpf: x86: Rename stack_size to regs_off in {save,restore}_regs() Yonghong Song
2022-07-26 17:11 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next 4/7] bpf: x86: Support in-register struct arguments Yonghong Song
2022-07-29 11:10 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2022-07-31 17:00 ` Yonghong Song
2022-07-26 17:11 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next 5/7] bpf: arm64: No support of struct value argument Yonghong Song
2022-07-26 17:12 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next 6/7] bpf: Populate struct value info in btf_func_model Yonghong Song
2022-07-26 17:12 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next 7/7] selftests/bpf: Add struct value tests with fentry programs Yonghong Song
2022-07-28 15:46 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next 0/7] bpf: Support struct value argument for trampoline base progs Kui-Feng Lee
2022-07-28 17:46 ` Yonghong Song
2022-07-28 19:57 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2022-07-28 23:30 ` Yonghong Song
2022-07-29 18:04 ` Kui-Feng Lee
2022-08-02 23:46 ` Yonghong Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YuPALUYnHcZ1drB5@krava \
--to=olsajiri@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox