From: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com>
To: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
kernel-team@fb.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/6] bpf: x86: Support in-register struct arguments
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2022 22:24:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YvlZ+ETaaTD3hwrM@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220812052435.523068-1-yhs@fb.com>
On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 10:24:35PM -0700, Yonghong Song wrote:
SNIP
> }
>
> static int invoke_bpf_prog(const struct btf_func_model *m, u8 **pprog,
> @@ -2020,6 +2081,7 @@ int arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *image, void *i
> struct bpf_tramp_links *fentry = &tlinks[BPF_TRAMP_FENTRY];
> struct bpf_tramp_links *fexit = &tlinks[BPF_TRAMP_FEXIT];
> struct bpf_tramp_links *fmod_ret = &tlinks[BPF_TRAMP_MODIFY_RETURN];
> + int struct_val_off, extra_nregs = 0;
> u8 **branches = NULL;
> u8 *prog;
> bool save_ret;
> @@ -2028,6 +2090,20 @@ int arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *image, void *i
> if (nr_args > 6)
> return -ENOTSUPP;
>
> + for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_FUNC_ARGS; i++) {
> + if (m->arg_flags[i] & BTF_FMODEL_STRUCT_ARG) {
> + /* Only support up to 16 bytes struct which should keep
> + * values in registers.
> + */
it seems that if the struct contains 'double' field, it's passed in
SSE register, which we don't support is save/restore
we should probably check struct's BTF in btf_distill_func_proto and
fail if we found anything else than regular regs types?
> + if (m->arg_size[i] > 16)
> + return -ENOTSUPP;
> +
> + extra_nregs += (m->arg_size[i] + 7) / 8 - 1;
> + }
> + }
> + if (nr_args + extra_nregs > 6)
should this value be minus the number of actually found struct arguments?
> + return -ENOTSUPP;
> +
> /* Generated trampoline stack layout:
> *
> * RBP + 8 [ return address ]
> @@ -2066,6 +2142,13 @@ int arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *image, void *i
> stack_size += (sizeof(struct bpf_tramp_run_ctx) + 7) & ~0x7;
> run_ctx_off = stack_size;
>
> + /* For structure argument */
> + for (i = 0; i < MAX_BPF_FUNC_ARGS; i++) {
> + if (m->arg_flags[i] & BTF_FMODEL_STRUCT_ARG)
> + stack_size += (m->arg_size[i] + 7) & ~0x7;
> + }
> + struct_val_off = stack_size;
could you please update the 'Generated trampoline stack layout' table
above with this offset
thanks,
jirka
> +
> if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_SKIP_FRAME) {
> /* skip patched call instruction and point orig_call to actual
> * body of the kernel function.
> @@ -2101,7 +2184,7 @@ int arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *image, void *i
> emit_stx(&prog, BPF_DW, BPF_REG_FP, BPF_REG_0, -ip_off);
> }
>
> - save_regs(m, &prog, nr_args, regs_off);
> + save_regs(m, &prog, nr_args, regs_off, struct_val_off);
>
> if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG) {
> /* arg1: mov rdi, im */
> @@ -2131,7 +2214,7 @@ int arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *image, void *i
> }
>
> if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG) {
> - restore_regs(m, &prog, nr_args, regs_off);
> + restore_regs(m, &prog, nr_args, regs_off, struct_val_off);
>
> if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_ORIG_STACK) {
> emit_ldx(&prog, BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_FP, 8);
> @@ -2172,7 +2255,7 @@ int arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *image, void *i
> }
>
> if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_RESTORE_REGS)
> - restore_regs(m, &prog, nr_args, regs_off);
> + restore_regs(m, &prog, nr_args, regs_off, struct_val_off);
>
> /* This needs to be done regardless. If there were fmod_ret programs,
> * the return value is only updated on the stack and still needs to be
> --
> 2.30.2
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-14 20:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-12 5:24 [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/6] bpf: Support struct argument for trampoline base progs Yonghong Song
2022-08-12 5:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/6] bpf: Add struct argument info in btf_func_model Yonghong Song
2022-08-12 5:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/6] bpf: x86: Rename stack_size to regs_off in {save,restore}_regs() Yonghong Song
2022-08-12 5:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/6] bpf: x86: Support in-register struct arguments Yonghong Song
2022-08-14 20:24 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2022-08-15 5:29 ` Yonghong Song
2022-08-15 7:29 ` Jiri Olsa
2022-08-15 15:25 ` Yonghong Song
2022-08-15 22:44 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-08-18 4:56 ` Yonghong Song
2022-08-18 20:44 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-08-24 19:04 ` Yonghong Song
2022-08-24 22:35 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-08-25 4:10 ` Yonghong Song
2022-08-24 19:05 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2022-08-25 4:04 ` Yonghong Song
2022-08-12 5:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 4/6] bpf: arm64: No support of struct argument Yonghong Song
2022-08-12 5:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 5/6] bpf: Populate struct argument info in btf_func_model Yonghong Song
2022-08-12 5:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 6/6] selftests/bpf: Add struct argument tests with fentry/fexit programs Yonghong Song
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YvlZ+ETaaTD3hwrM@krava \
--to=olsajiri@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox