BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>,
	Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	KP Singh <kpsingh@chromium.org>,
	Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
	"Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	Martynas Pumputis <m@lambda.lt>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 bpf-next 3/6] bpf: Use given function address for trampoline ip arg
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2022 13:30:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yxsj7KUhVYYxJ1l9@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220909101245.347173-4-jolsa@kernel.org>

On Fri, Sep 09, 2022 at 12:12:42PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> Using function address given at the generation time as the trampoline
> ip argument. This way we get directly the function address that we
> need, so we don't need to:
>   - read the ip from the stack
>   - subtract X86_PATCH_SIZE
>   - subtract ENDBR_INSN_SIZE if CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT is enabled
>     which is not even implemented yet ;-)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
> ---
>  arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 9 ++++-----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> index ae89f4143eb4..1047686cc545 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> @@ -2039,13 +2039,14 @@ static int invoke_bpf_mod_ret(const struct btf_func_model *m, u8 **pprog,
>  int arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *image, void *image_end,
>  				const struct btf_func_model *m, u32 flags,
>  				struct bpf_tramp_links *tlinks,
> -				void *orig_call)
> +				void *func_addr)
>  {
>  	int ret, i, nr_args = m->nr_args, extra_nregs = 0;
>  	int regs_off, ip_off, args_off, stack_size = nr_args * 8, run_ctx_off;
>  	struct bpf_tramp_links *fentry = &tlinks[BPF_TRAMP_FENTRY];
>  	struct bpf_tramp_links *fexit = &tlinks[BPF_TRAMP_FEXIT];
>  	struct bpf_tramp_links *fmod_ret = &tlinks[BPF_TRAMP_MODIFY_RETURN];
> +	void *orig_call = func_addr;
>  	u8 **branches = NULL;
>  	u8 *prog;
>  	bool save_ret;
> @@ -2126,12 +2127,10 @@ int arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *image, void *i
>  
>  	if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_IP_ARG) {
>  		/* Store IP address of the traced function:
> -		 * mov rax, QWORD PTR [rbp + 8]
> -		 * sub rax, X86_PATCH_SIZE
> +		 * mov rax, func_addr

Shouldn't that be: movabs? Regular mov can't do 64bit immediates.

Also curse Intel syntax, this is bloody unreadable.

>  		 * mov QWORD PTR [rbp - ip_off], rax
>  		 */
> -		emit_ldx(&prog, BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_FP, 8);
> -		EMIT4(0x48, 0x83, 0xe8, X86_PATCH_SIZE);
> +		emit_mov_imm64(&prog, BPF_REG_0, (long) func_addr >> 32, (u32) (long) func_addr);
>  		emit_stx(&prog, BPF_DW, BPF_REG_FP, BPF_REG_0, -ip_off);
>  	}
>  
> -- 
> 2.37.3
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2022-09-09 11:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-09 10:12 [PATCHv3 bpf-next 0/6] bpf: Fixes for CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT Jiri Olsa
2022-09-09 10:12 ` [PATCHv3 bpf-next 1/6] kprobes: Add new KPROBE_FLAG_ON_FUNC_ENTRY kprobe flag Jiri Olsa
2022-09-09 10:12 ` [PATCHv3 bpf-next 2/6] ftrace: Keep the resolved addr in kallsyms_callback Jiri Olsa
2022-09-09 10:12 ` [PATCHv3 bpf-next 3/6] bpf: Use given function address for trampoline ip arg Jiri Olsa
2022-09-09 11:30   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2022-09-09 11:40     ` Jiri Olsa
2022-09-09 10:12 ` [PATCHv3 bpf-next 4/6] bpf: Adjust kprobe_multi entry_ip for CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT Jiri Olsa
2022-09-09 11:49   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-09 12:25     ` Jiri Olsa
2022-09-09 10:12 ` [PATCHv3 bpf-next 5/6] bpf: Return value in kprobe get_func_ip only for entry address Jiri Olsa
2022-09-09 11:57   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-09-09 10:12 ` [PATCHv3 bpf-next 6/6] selftests/bpf: Fix get_func_ip offset test for CONFIG_X86_KERNEL_IBT Jiri Olsa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Yxsj7KUhVYYxJ1l9@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@chromium.org \
    --cc=m@lambda.lt \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=sdf@google.com \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox