From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B9CC14A099; Tue, 24 Dec 2024 21:29:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1735075744; cv=none; b=XNgFLsONzoxZrnqdNYQZIXiO5zwSU47MA8q7ZbGSnFBrehq9QENq0N5fny186Gg+hMxBGK4AMJdX1s2OL96gb53CjZ63vIuOQmMVvU4M3T49lYxacaSxKc26dZN8NTgOQf0vvVWagpkBBqyqzeahh0OfbkKHjeWiQGMrDPn3l3Q= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1735075744; c=relaxed/simple; bh=5+NxKNw1ro8ezob6iU7PBoaUmScg7SvQzfMoCsnHTNc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=nKPmMi4LJ5N90rOLwyjI82Bo0cTMQ5irJrChFTPf3HEb/4ah6ItI2dBOBLm6sAzn1iGWkS3ZX2NX2eDHHcLujhPsdPRR3GGbqw3mQhs6NuZlfmwDdMRFiziOS4kXmcWrbz9TQe9HNtedty+N3EH60gpyxfwE6avYPnFK0Lcdzt0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=dpGftYVK; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="dpGftYVK" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C4096C4CED0; Tue, 24 Dec 2024 21:29:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1735075743; bh=5+NxKNw1ro8ezob6iU7PBoaUmScg7SvQzfMoCsnHTNc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=dpGftYVKRap4lp5SyX8iuRC80HJym40pkphxJ+1d8vYsk0MwT5Sd0rKNd3sOk7Eqv Ksy7UGkNLsCWc1Xbq5L4YZscwqysVCpVzuVa1yxlYLQDYs3XIwRMhoz7qB0AvT+FfU gRz6eocVOpewgV6pAVweQpJN1AlUA13VBg6lCSMAxskLZDiA69X45Z77870lT8cQ5i VGm+IQZlB8O8gHHUR4YwQDjnMSDe2oprTyBpgRnm9ZcfgLj+k7p0iw/sNVz7Pxk3u0 6LldAFz/UAC1lXV56yVvk3ox6HEbc+HkboFJT4wv+fU4hfvQ9ghHUPkpE3QEoUcswc nvMyhuGh4e2Bg== Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2024 11:29:02 -1000 From: Tejun Heo To: Andrea Righi Cc: Yury Norov , David Vernet , Changwoo Min , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Juri Lelli , Vincent Guittot , Dietmar Eggemann , Steven Rostedt , Ben Segall , Mel Gorman , Valentin Schneider , bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/10] sched_ext: idle: introduce SCX_PICK_IDLE_NODE Message-ID: References: <20241220154107.287478-1-arighi@nvidia.com> <20241220154107.287478-9-arighi@nvidia.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Tue, Dec 24, 2024 at 09:22:49AM +0100, Andrea Righi wrote: > > > enum scx_pick_idle_cpu_flags { > > > SCX_PICK_IDLE_CORE = 1LLU << 0, /* pick a CPU whose SMT siblings are also idle */ > > > + SCX_PICK_IDLE_NODE = 1LLU << 1, /* pick a CPU in the same target NUMA node */ > > > > SCX_FORCE_NODE or SCX_FIX_NODE? > > Ok, I like SCX_FORCE_NODE. How about SCX_PICK_IDLE_IN_NODE? Thanks. -- tejun