From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E121C1A2399; Wed, 29 Jan 2025 16:19:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738167569; cv=none; b=l1Ps2WPnKyTqjdDuPD9TLmkzAWV3rjo7hWTncJQELJJoNDdbe4jVFMtW/qkpxa+cjnzbPnIjayazvn9qxkND9BJCt5eAyrrX7pbS8qShR7h2TwsnljzvoWm3sssQ6if8pcK9a9VfFJEDygE2PpRq7Pk37vWeQ59jm7h9ned8sj4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1738167569; c=relaxed/simple; bh=tfSftwsw3SrB21XJ7sFJV016rvpuZiWMOMn9qVmuYRQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=dzitOYm4cbckNGKZWK6+1PYpEjmLmCX9e+3g5oryclxDVOyalqa/3/oD4omkdIUSLl9Cvz0/yz45UlElN+KxKL5e6NtDfw+vHVXO6CCUZH+OM9ZUmjMyArsSCXDoqzHZ4SFrCRxLQ0fcm0zZDSu3mo4otFspArbRPt8CmtQokHs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=JiNC79Vc; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="JiNC79Vc" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 58F14C4CED3; Wed, 29 Jan 2025 16:19:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1738167568; bh=tfSftwsw3SrB21XJ7sFJV016rvpuZiWMOMn9qVmuYRQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=JiNC79Vcc44ICGUcCP0iA7Qt5RFfni3eKu4MXDUBACs1pOp4/V11sGKMkA34JWHe3 /ECYRjq8OBm7ec2WRUbgt7/ZMxwA1bYnVzw2iBpyD8EXal0QS59JDXP+9jXE1pdkiS ci0vsNlYDsKl/W75kM3Ws/AjRBrps7NZRY41Rj51tZu16sveerpMmKjWPWP8B9GDz+ UPvrwP5myH8migxnc58/pG6cF6VPtsSW6Wni447d8ClfJevoX2++XDqtvouQWCQWZq LqbexangFs+D7Tkz7efp5Cojfeqx34ArF7wNeUPoq127MHHc1UNU6zhmw36jPYi5ic eH420FNyzBgfA== Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2025 06:19:27 -1000 From: Tejun Heo To: Andrea Righi Cc: Ihor Solodrai , David Vernet , Changwoo Min , Alexei Starovoitov , bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: selftests/sched_ext: testing on BPF CI Message-ID: References: <3fb44500b87b0f1d8360bc7a1f3ae972d3c5282f@linux.dev> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 08:27:02AM +0100, Andrea Righi wrote: > Hi Ihor, > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 12:21:43AM +0000, Ihor Solodrai wrote: > > Hi Tejun, Andrea. > > > > I tested a couple of variants of bpf-next + sched_ext source tree, > > just sharing the results. > > Thanks for testing! > > > > > I found a working state: BPF CI pipeline ran successfully twice > > (that's 8 build + run of selftests/sched_ext/runner in total). > > Ok. > > > > > Working state requires most patches between sched_ext/master and > > sched_ext/for-6.14-fixes [1], and also the patch > > "tools/sched_ext: Receive updates from SCX repo" [2] > > > > On plain bpf-next the dsp_local_on test fails [3]. > > Without the patch [2] there is a build error [4]: missing > > SCX_ENUM_INIT definition. > > We definitely need all the patches in sched_ext/for-6.14-fixes. I think > once Tejun sends the PR and we land the for-6.14-fixes upstream we should > reach a stable state with the sched_ext selftests. I don't have any other > additional pending fix at the moment. > > > > > We probably don't want to enable selftests/sched_ext on BPF CI with > > that many "temporary" patches. I suggest to wait until all of this is > > merged upstream. > > Sounds reasonable to me. Tejun? Sure. Thanks. -- tejun