BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
To: Aditi Ghag <aditi.ghag@isovalent.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, kafai@fb.com, edumazet@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 bpf-next 2/4] bpf: Add bpf_sock_destroy kfunc
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2023 14:37:02 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZB4X/uOEdq79Lbof@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230323200633.3175753-3-aditi.ghag@isovalent.com>

On 03/23, Aditi Ghag wrote:
> The socket destroy kfunc is used to forcefully terminate sockets from
> certain BPF contexts. We plan to use the capability in Cilium to force
> client sockets to reconnect when their remote load-balancing backends are
> deleted. The other use case is on-the-fly policy enforcement where  
> existing
> socket connections prevented by policies need to be forcefully terminated.
> The helper allows terminating sockets that may or may not be actively
> sending traffic.

> The helper is currently exposed to certain BPF iterators where users can
> filter, and terminate selected sockets.  Additionally, the helper can only
> be called from these BPF contexts that ensure socket locking in order to
> allow synchronous execution of destroy helpers that also acquire socket
> locks. The previous commit that batches UDP sockets during iteration
> facilitated a synchronous invocation of the destroy helper from BPF  
> context
> by skipping taking socket locks in the destroy handler. TCP iterators
> already supported batching.

> The helper takes `sock_common` type argument, even though it expects, and
> casts them to a `sock` pointer. This enables the verifier to allow the
> sock_destroy kfunc to be called for TCP with `sock_common` and UDP with
> `sock` structs. As a comparison, BPF helpers enable this behavior with the
> `ARG_PTR_TO_BTF_ID_SOCK_COMMON` argument type. However, there is no such
> option available with the verifier logic that handles kfuncs where BTF
> types are inferred. Furthermore, as `sock_common` only has a subset of
> certain fields of `sock`, casting pointer to the latter type might not
> always be safe. Hence, the BPF kfunc converts the argument to a full sock
> before casting.

> Signed-off-by: Aditi Ghag <aditi.ghag@isovalent.com>
> ---
>   net/core/filter.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   net/ipv4/tcp.c    | 10 ++++++---
>   net/ipv4/udp.c    |  6 ++++--
>   3 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

> diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
> index 1d6f165923bf..ba3e0dac119c 100644
> --- a/net/core/filter.c
> +++ b/net/core/filter.c
> @@ -11621,3 +11621,57 @@ bpf_sk_base_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id)

>   	return func;
>   }
> +
> +/* Disables missing prototype warnings */
> +__diag_push();
> +__diag_ignore_all("-Wmissing-prototypes",
> +		  "Global functions as their definitions will be in vmlinux BTF");
> +
> +/* bpf_sock_destroy: Destroy the given socket with ECONNABORTED error  
> code.
> + *
> + * The helper expects a non-NULL pointer to a socket. It invokes the
> + * protocol specific socket destroy handlers.
> + *
> + * The helper can only be called from BPF contexts that have acquired  
> the socket
> + * locks.
> + *
> + * Parameters:
> + * @sock: Pointer to socket to be destroyed
> + *
> + * Return:
> + * On error, may return EPROTONOSUPPORT, EINVAL.
> + * EPROTONOSUPPORT if protocol specific destroy handler is not  
> implemented.
> + * 0 otherwise
> + */
> +__bpf_kfunc int bpf_sock_destroy(struct sock_common *sock)
> +{
> +	struct sock *sk = (struct sock *)sock;
> +
> +	if (!sk)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	/* The locking semantics that allow for synchronous execution of the
> +	 * destroy handlers are only supported for TCP and UDP.
> +	 */
> +	if (!sk->sk_prot->diag_destroy || sk->sk_protocol == IPPROTO_RAW)
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;

Copy-pasting from v3, let's discuss here.

Maybe make it more opt-in? (vs current "opt ipproto_raw out")

if (sk->sk_prot->diag_destroy != udp_abort &&
     sk->sk_prot->diag_destroy != tcp_abort)
             return -EOPNOTSUPP;

Is it more robust? Or does it look uglier? )
But maybe fine as is, I'm just thinking out loud..

> +
> +	return sk->sk_prot->diag_destroy(sk, ECONNABORTED);
> +}
> +
> +__diag_pop()
> +
> +BTF_SET8_START(sock_destroy_kfunc_set)
> +BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_sock_destroy)
> +BTF_SET8_END(sock_destroy_kfunc_set)
> +
> +static const struct btf_kfunc_id_set bpf_sock_destroy_kfunc_set = {
> +	.owner = THIS_MODULE,
> +	.set   = &sock_destroy_kfunc_set,
> +};
> +
> +static int init_subsystem(void)
> +{
> +	return register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING,  
> &bpf_sock_destroy_kfunc_set);
> +}
> +late_initcall(init_subsystem);
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp.c b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
> index 33f559f491c8..5df6231016e3 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
> @@ -4678,8 +4678,10 @@ int tcp_abort(struct sock *sk, int err)
>   		return 0;
>   	}

> -	/* Don't race with userspace socket closes such as tcp_close. */
> -	lock_sock(sk);
> +	/* BPF context ensures sock locking. */
> +	if (!has_current_bpf_ctx())
> +		/* Don't race with userspace socket closes such as tcp_close. */
> +		lock_sock(sk);

>   	if (sk->sk_state == TCP_LISTEN) {
>   		tcp_set_state(sk, TCP_CLOSE);
> @@ -4701,9 +4703,11 @@ int tcp_abort(struct sock *sk, int err)
>   	}

>   	bh_unlock_sock(sk);
> +
>   	local_bh_enable();
>   	tcp_write_queue_purge(sk);
> -	release_sock(sk);
> +	if (!has_current_bpf_ctx())
> +		release_sock(sk);
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tcp_abort);
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/udp.c b/net/ipv4/udp.c
> index 58c620243e47..408836102e20 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/udp.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/udp.c
> @@ -2925,7 +2925,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(udp_poll);

>   int udp_abort(struct sock *sk, int err)
>   {
> -	lock_sock(sk);
> +	if (!has_current_bpf_ctx())
> +		lock_sock(sk);

>   	/* udp{v6}_destroy_sock() sets it under the sk lock, avoid racing
>   	 * with close()
> @@ -2938,7 +2939,8 @@ int udp_abort(struct sock *sk, int err)
>   	__udp_disconnect(sk, 0);

>   out:
> -	release_sock(sk);
> +	if (!has_current_bpf_ctx())
> +		release_sock(sk);

>   	return 0;
>   }
> --
> 2.34.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-03-24 21:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-23 20:06 [PATCH v4 bpf-next 0/5] bpf-nex: Add socket destroy capability Aditi Ghag
2023-03-23 20:06 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 1/4] bpf: Implement batching in UDP iterator Aditi Ghag
2023-03-24 21:56   ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-03-27 15:52     ` Aditi Ghag
2023-03-27 16:52       ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-03-27 22:28   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-28 17:06     ` Aditi Ghag
2023-03-28 21:33       ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-29 16:20         ` Aditi Ghag
2023-03-23 20:06 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 2/4] bpf: Add bpf_sock_destroy kfunc Aditi Ghag
2023-03-23 23:58   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-24 21:37   ` Stanislav Fomichev [this message]
2023-03-30 14:42     ` Aditi Ghag
2023-03-30 16:32       ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-03-30 17:30         ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-04-03 15:58           ` Aditi Ghag
2023-03-23 20:06 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 3/4] bpf,tcp: Avoid taking fast sock lock in iterator Aditi Ghag
2023-03-24 21:45   ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-03-28 15:20     ` Aditi Ghag
2023-03-27 22:34   ` Martin KaFai Lau
2023-03-23 20:06 ` [PATCH v4 bpf-next 4/4] selftests/bpf: Add tests for bpf_sock_destroy Aditi Ghag
2023-03-24 21:52   ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-03-27 15:57     ` Aditi Ghag
2023-03-27 16:54       ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-03-28 17:50         ` Aditi Ghag
2023-03-28 18:35           ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-03-29 23:13             ` Aditi Ghag
2023-03-29 23:25               ` Aditi Ghag
2023-03-29 23:25               ` Stanislav Fomichev

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZB4X/uOEdq79Lbof@google.com \
    --to=sdf@google.com \
    --cc=aditi.ghag@isovalent.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox