Re: [PATCH v4 07/10] io_uring/cmd: return -EOPNOTSUPP if net is disabled

[Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>]

On Tue, Sep 05, 2023 at 08:32:15AM -0400, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote:
> Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org> writes:
> 
> > Protect io_uring_cmd_sock() to be called if CONFIG_NET is not set. If
> > network is not enabled, but io_uring is, then we want to return
> > -EOPNOTSUPP for any possible socket operation.
> >
> > This is helpful because io_uring_cmd_sock() can now call functions that
> > only exits if CONFIG_NET is enabled without having #ifdef CONFIG_NET
> > inside the function itself.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
> > ---
> >  io_uring/uring_cmd.c | 8 ++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/io_uring/uring_cmd.c b/io_uring/uring_cmd.c
> > index 60f843a357e0..6a91e1af7d05 100644
> > --- a/io_uring/uring_cmd.c
> > +++ b/io_uring/uring_cmd.c
> > @@ -167,6 +167,7 @@ int io_uring_cmd_import_fixed(u64 ubuf, unsigned long len, int rw,
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(io_uring_cmd_import_fixed);
> >  
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_NET)
> >  int io_uring_cmd_sock(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd, unsigned int issue_flags)
> >  {
> >  	struct socket *sock = cmd->file->private_data;
> > @@ -192,4 +193,11 @@ int io_uring_cmd_sock(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd, unsigned int issue_flags)
> >  		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> >  	}
> >  }
> > +#else
> > +int io_uring_cmd_sock(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd, unsigned int issue_flags)
> > +{
> > +	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > +}
> > +#endif
> > +
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(io_uring_cmd_sock);
> 
> It doesn't make much sense to export the symbol on the !CONFIG_NET case.
> Usually, you'd make it a 'static inline' in the header file (even though
> it won't be ever inlined in this case):
> 
> in include/linux/io_uring.h:
> 
> #if defined(CONFIG_NET)
> int io_uring_cmd_sock(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd, unsigned int issue_flags);
> #else
> static inline int io_uring_cmd_sock(struct io_uring_cmd *cmd, unsigned int issue_flags)
> {
> 	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> }
> #endif
> 
> But this is a minor detail. I'd say to consider doing it if you end up doing
> another spin of the patchset.  Other than that, looks good to me.

This makes sense, and I will add the symbol export inside the
"if defined(CONFIG_NET)" block, since I need to respin this patchset to
address the sockptr_t concern.

Thanks for the good reviews!