From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (lindbergh.monkeyblade.net [23.128.96.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C49E8C2C6 for ; Thu, 26 Oct 2023 05:35:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=resnulli-us.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.i=@resnulli-us.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.b="YLGNnZDX" Received: from mail-ej1-x62a.google.com (mail-ej1-x62a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 392FE115 for ; Wed, 25 Oct 2023 22:35:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ej1-x62a.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-9c773ac9b15so70441466b.2 for ; Wed, 25 Oct 2023 22:35:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=resnulli-us.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1698298508; x=1698903308; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=AnW5wkCi1zvUqw9QeSavDrGwNvTC4IDf+32SvYPJoaM=; b=YLGNnZDXiKBPV/2J5+JtclwBX/3I319PXqRsZDqosfcTOFiEXeJhwH5SwG6lrhx7GH jW717/GOW0N+tFD7PE6/EMTfhV+PnGL4FxLi8ty05CL58or8WkOwxnXUVmExj0DmlS4+ QQCkSjEpvt0vtrw2KrStTt29prIoDmvK8M2RAAVq5wRsSqhlg8C+eNRGbxzoNNiqcepV sfecRcYsBXVeGJtlDjaJAAgm97MvK2UUEQpL7swv2jlhFDJb6Vh17+Qtug6pocSj4Hpx 3HWmHfYdU4ydqZ8zD3tmb/tz/hp0VJnonOrMB5lXfCD5lf4bWFo2xN2/r4zRLVsco230 qPUg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1698298508; x=1698903308; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=AnW5wkCi1zvUqw9QeSavDrGwNvTC4IDf+32SvYPJoaM=; b=Tt8bM7ZwWKqr2AdePpEHKtFYTCnIglrK7p8QFZA42xojkWyg84rgc9+U/t/W+ra+iB YPr9JMHHmxBGnhIaP/9jArhKHxnWfdkzs+mtm5sgJwHXjjI0ZA21mLDFx4K2YnqGGVSV COIREUsjxalxuJ7PqnAseWbtewYaLV+x3L+Jsv7m+cLG9enTvG9IuUljOcwjQiedmE+G iF2v98jEU6CL5SQxJTSzj+ocecWxQuAdIcDTmAx3V2pf4BnkNNxZ+vzYTMKj3EeO2wlZ xw0ZC6TmiNJEySmsgWU3jBCNLWnESmBAK3XZKN7uLZUBREjChcyMTV5/a+tImAsFu0b0 OCQg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxOq5afd6SXzlaZAMgqeTGJ573jeYO6szTXVg+4zXyoX5TvtUQ6 XF6ldpQOB2fyvSgiBgJpBx3BdA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGpJs6UjB5/zt89grKMahUSoyHMhultp9ijTf1cz/ECcdJ/yxBvo32O3TnRlEnq7e2e7Zi5DA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:dc92:b0:9a3:c4f4:12de with SMTP id cs18-20020a170906dc9200b009a3c4f412demr13178771ejc.37.1698298508693; Wed, 25 Oct 2023 22:35:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([80.95.114.184]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b7-20020a1709062b4700b009ade1a4f795sm10784002ejg.168.2023.10.25.22.35.07 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 25 Oct 2023 22:35:08 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2023 07:35:06 +0200 From: Jiri Pirko To: Martin KaFai Lau Cc: Daniel Borkmann , bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, razor@blackwall.org, ast@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org, john.fastabend@gmail.com, sdf@google.com, toke@kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org, andrew@lunn.ch Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/7] Add bpf programmable net device Message-ID: References: <20231024214904.29825-1-daniel@iogearbox.net> <169819142514.13417.3415333680978363345.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 06:54:27PM CEST, martin.lau@linux.dev wrote: >On 10/25/23 8:50 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote: >> Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 01:50:25AM CEST, patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org wrote: >> > Hello: >> > >> > This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master) >> > by Martin KaFai Lau : >> >> Interesting, applied within 2 hours after send. You bpf people don't >> care about some 24h timeout? > >24hr? The v1 was posted to both netdev and bpf list on 9/25. It was 10/24 >yesterday. The part you commented in patch 1 had not been changed much since >v1, so there was a month of time. netdev is always on the cc list. Multiple >people (Andrew, Jakub...etc) had already helped to review and Daniel had >addressed the comments. The change history had been diminishing from v1 to v4 >and v4 changes was mostly nit-picking already. AFAIK netdev maintainer have a policy (which I thoink I saw written down somewhere but cannot find) that the patch stays on the list one day before it is getting applied. It actually makes a lot of sense. Anyway, I may be wrong. >