public inbox for bpf@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>,
	Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	KP Singh <kpsingh@chromium.org>,
	Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
	Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 4/6] selftests/bpf: Use bpf_link__destroy in fill_link_info tests
Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2023 15:12:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZUOuY8Wfh7UQgz88@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEf4BzbKCtON6qry3qpoO5FdNbwMUWV7F2FHzHi+K34qBv3pjg@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Nov 01, 2023 at 03:24:36PM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 1:25 PM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > The fill_link_info test keeps skeleton open and just creates
> > various links. We are wrongly calling bpf_link__detach after
> > each test to close them, we need to call bpf_link__destroy.
> >
> > Also we need to set the link NULL so the skeleton destroy
> > won't try to destroy them again.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
> > ---
> >  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fill_link_info.c       | 13 +++++++++----
> >  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fill_link_info.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fill_link_info.c
> > index 97142a4db374..0379872c445a 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fill_link_info.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fill_link_info.c
> > @@ -22,6 +22,11 @@ static __u64 kmulti_addrs[KMULTI_CNT];
> >  #define KPROBE_FUNC "bpf_fentry_test1"
> >  static __u64 kprobe_addr;
> >
> > +#define LINK_DESTROY(__link) ({                \
> > +       bpf_link__destroy(__link);      \
> > +       __link = NULL;                  \
> > +})
> > +
> >  #define UPROBE_FILE "/proc/self/exe"
> >  static ssize_t uprobe_offset;
> >  /* uprobe attach point */
> > @@ -157,7 +162,7 @@ static void test_kprobe_fill_link_info(struct test_fill_link_info *skel,
> >         } else {
> >                 kprobe_fill_invalid_user_buffer(link_fd);
> >         }
> > -       bpf_link__detach(skel->links.kprobe_run);
> > +       LINK_DESTROY(skel->links.kprobe_run);
> >  }
> >
> >  static void test_tp_fill_link_info(struct test_fill_link_info *skel)
> > @@ -171,7 +176,7 @@ static void test_tp_fill_link_info(struct test_fill_link_info *skel)
> >         link_fd = bpf_link__fd(skel->links.tp_run);
> >         err = verify_perf_link_info(link_fd, BPF_PERF_EVENT_TRACEPOINT, 0, 0, 0);
> >         ASSERT_OK(err, "verify_perf_link_info");
> > -       bpf_link__detach(skel->links.tp_run);
> > +       LINK_DESTROY(skel->links.tp_run);
> >  }
> >
> >  static void test_uprobe_fill_link_info(struct test_fill_link_info *skel,
> > @@ -189,7 +194,7 @@ static void test_uprobe_fill_link_info(struct test_fill_link_info *skel,
> >         link_fd = bpf_link__fd(skel->links.uprobe_run);
> >         err = verify_perf_link_info(link_fd, type, 0, uprobe_offset, 0);
> >         ASSERT_OK(err, "verify_perf_link_info");
> > -       bpf_link__detach(skel->links.uprobe_run);
> > +       LINK_DESTROY(skel->links.uprobe_run);
> >  }
> >
> >  static int verify_kmulti_link_info(int fd, bool retprobe)
> > @@ -295,7 +300,7 @@ static void test_kprobe_multi_fill_link_info(struct test_fill_link_info *skel,
> >         } else {
> >                 verify_kmulti_invalid_user_buffer(link_fd);
> >         }
> > -       bpf_link__detach(skel->links.kmulti_run);
> > +       LINK_DESTROY(skel->links.kmulti_run);
> 
> if we don't want skeleton to take care of these links, we shouldn't
> assign them into skel->links region, IMO
> 
> so perhaps the proper fix is to have local bpf_link variable in these tests?

ok, that looks cleaner

jirka

  reply	other threads:[~2023-11-02 14:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-25 20:24 [PATCH bpf-next 0/6] bpf: Add link_info support for uprobe multi link Jiri Olsa
2023-10-25 20:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/6] libbpf: Add st_type argument to elf_resolve_syms_offsets function Jiri Olsa
2023-10-26 16:29   ` Song Liu
2023-10-25 20:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/6] bpf: Store ref_ctr_offsets values in bpf_uprobe array Jiri Olsa
2023-10-26 16:31   ` Song Liu
2023-10-27 13:56     ` Jiri Olsa
2023-10-27 14:23       ` Song Liu
2023-11-01 22:21         ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-10-25 20:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/6] bpf: Add link_info support for uprobe multi link Jiri Olsa
2023-10-26 11:57   ` Yafang Shao
2023-10-27 13:59     ` Jiri Olsa
2023-11-09  8:56       ` Jiri Olsa
2023-10-26 17:55   ` Song Liu
2023-10-27 14:29     ` Jiri Olsa
2023-11-01 22:21       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-11-02 14:58         ` Jiri Olsa
2023-11-02 16:21           ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-10-30 10:18   ` Quentin Monnet
2023-10-30 21:17     ` Jiri Olsa
2023-11-01 22:21   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-11-02 14:43     ` Jiri Olsa
2023-11-02 16:19       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-10-25 20:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next 4/6] selftests/bpf: Use bpf_link__destroy in fill_link_info tests Jiri Olsa
2023-10-26 11:41   ` Yafang Shao
2023-10-26 18:00     ` Song Liu
2023-11-01 22:24   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-11-02 14:12     ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2023-10-25 20:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next 5/6] selftests/bpf: Add link_info test for uprobe_multi link Jiri Olsa
2023-10-26 18:13   ` Song Liu
2023-11-01 22:27   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-10-25 20:24 ` [PATCH bpf-next 6/6] bpftool: Add support to display uprobe_multi links Jiri Olsa
2023-10-26 18:27   ` Song Liu
2023-10-30 10:17   ` Quentin Monnet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZUOuY8Wfh7UQgz88@krava \
    --to=olsajiri@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@chromium.org \
    --cc=laoar.shao@gmail.com \
    --cc=sdf@google.com \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox