BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
To: Tushar Vyavahare <tushar.vyavahare@intel.com>
Cc: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	<bjorn@kernel.org>, <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>,
	<jonathan.lemon@gmail.com>, <davem@davemloft.net>,
	<kuba@kernel.org>, <pabeni@redhat.com>, <ast@kernel.org>,
	<daniel@iogearbox.net>, <tirthendu.sarkar@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2] selftests/xsk: fix for SEND_RECEIVE_UNALIGNED test
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2023 14:23:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZXsBx31uOqyrfDvD@boxer> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231214130007.33281-1-tushar.vyavahare@intel.com>

On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 01:00:07PM +0000, Tushar Vyavahare wrote:

I think target tree should be bpf, not bpf-next

> Fix test broken by shared umem test and framework enhancement commit.
> 
> Correct the current implementation of pkt_stream_replace_half() by
> ensuring that nb_valid_entries are not set to half, as this is not true
> for all the tests. Ensure that the expected value for valid_entries for
> the SEND_RECEIVE_UNALIGNED test equals the total number of packets sent,
> which is 4096.
> 
> Create a new function called pkt_stream_pkt_set() that allows for packet
> modification to meet specific requirements while ensuring the accurate
> maintenance of the valid packet count to prevent inconsistencies in packet
> tracking.
> 
> Acked-by: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>
> Fixes: 6d198a89c004 ("selftests/xsk: Add a test for shared umem feature")
> Reported-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tushar Vyavahare <tushar.vyavahare@intel.com>

besides subject fix,

Reviewed-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>

> 
> ---
> v1->v2
> - Updated git commit message for better clarity as suggested in the
>   review. [Maciej]
> - Renamed pkt_valid() to set_pkt_valid() for better clarity. [Maciej]
> - Fixed double space issue. [Maciej]
> - Included Magnus's acknowledgement.
> - Remove the redundant part from the set_pkt_valid() if condition.
>   [Maciej]
> - remove pkt_modify().
> - added pkt_stream_pkt_set(). [Magnus]
> - renamed mod_valid to prev_pkt_valid. [Tirtha]
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c | 25 +++++++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c
> index b604c570309a..b1102ee13faa 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c
> @@ -634,16 +634,24 @@ static u32 pkt_nb_frags(u32 frame_size, struct pkt_stream *pkt_stream, struct pk
>  	return nb_frags;
>  }
>  
> +static bool set_pkt_valid(int offset, u32 len)
> +{
> +	return len <= MAX_ETH_JUMBO_SIZE;
> +}
> +
>  static void pkt_set(struct pkt_stream *pkt_stream, struct pkt *pkt, int offset, u32 len)
>  {
>  	pkt->offset = offset;
>  	pkt->len = len;
> -	if (len > MAX_ETH_JUMBO_SIZE) {
> -		pkt->valid = false;
> -	} else {
> -		pkt->valid = true;
> -		pkt_stream->nb_valid_entries++;
> -	}
> +	pkt->valid = set_pkt_valid(offset, len);
> +}
> +
> +static void pkt_stream_pkt_set(struct pkt_stream *pkt_stream, struct pkt *pkt, int offset, u32 len)
> +{
> +	bool prev_pkt_valid = pkt->valid;
> +
> +	pkt_set(pkt_stream, pkt, offset, len);
> +	pkt_stream->nb_valid_entries += pkt->valid - prev_pkt_valid;
>  }
>  
>  static u32 pkt_get_buffer_len(struct xsk_umem_info *umem, u32 len)
> @@ -665,7 +673,7 @@ static struct pkt_stream *__pkt_stream_generate(u32 nb_pkts, u32 pkt_len, u32 nb
>  	for (i = 0; i < nb_pkts; i++) {
>  		struct pkt *pkt = &pkt_stream->pkts[i];
>  
> -		pkt_set(pkt_stream, pkt, 0, pkt_len);
> +		pkt_stream_pkt_set(pkt_stream, pkt, 0, pkt_len);
>  		pkt->pkt_nb = nb_start + i * nb_off;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -700,10 +708,9 @@ static void __pkt_stream_replace_half(struct ifobject *ifobj, u32 pkt_len,
>  
>  	pkt_stream = pkt_stream_clone(ifobj->xsk->pkt_stream);
>  	for (i = 1; i < ifobj->xsk->pkt_stream->nb_pkts; i += 2)
> -		pkt_set(pkt_stream, &pkt_stream->pkts[i], offset, pkt_len);
> +		pkt_stream_pkt_set(pkt_stream, &pkt_stream->pkts[i], offset, pkt_len);
>  
>  	ifobj->xsk->pkt_stream = pkt_stream;
> -	pkt_stream->nb_valid_entries /= 2;
>  }
>  
>  static void pkt_stream_replace_half(struct test_spec *test, u32 pkt_len, int offset)
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2023-12-14 13:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-14 13:00 [PATCH bpf-next v2] selftests/xsk: fix for SEND_RECEIVE_UNALIGNED test Tushar Vyavahare
2023-12-14 13:23 ` Maciej Fijalkowski [this message]
2023-12-14 13:36   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-12-14 15:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZXsBx31uOqyrfDvD@boxer \
    --to=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bjorn@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jonathan.lemon@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=tirthendu.sarkar@intel.com \
    --cc=tushar.vyavahare@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox