From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
Cc: Daniel Xu <dxu@dxuuu.xyz>,
jolsa@kernel.org, quentin@isovalent.com,
andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH dwarves v3] pahole: Inject kfunc decl tags into BTF
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 11:24:13 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zbe1DfHjhZHwIKha@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49da8aff-1ec7-b908-2167-ee499e7a857a@oracle.com>
Em Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 01:05:05PM +0000, Alan Maguire escreveu:
> This should probably be a BTF feature supported by --btf_features; that
> way we'd have a mechanism to switch it off if needed. Can you look at
> adding a "tag_kfunc" or whatever name suits into the btf_features[]
> array in pahole.c? Something like:
> BTF_FEATURE(tag_kfunc, btf_tag_kfunc, false),
> You'll also then need to add a btf_tag_kfunc boolean field to
> struct conf_load, and generation of kfunc tags should then be guarded by
> if (conf_load->btf_tag_kfunc)
> ...so that the tags are added conditionally depending on whether
> the user wants them.
> Then if a user specifies --btf_features=all or some subset of BTF
> features including "tag_kfunc" they will get kfunc tags.
Agreed.
> We probably should also move to using --btf_features instead of the
> current combination of "--" parameters when pahole is bumped to v1.26.
Alan, talking about that, I guess we better tag v1.26 before merging
this new kfunc work, wdyt?
- Arnaldo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-29 14:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-29 1:30 [PATCH dwarves v3] pahole: Inject kfunc decl tags into BTF Daniel Xu
2024-01-29 13:05 ` Alan Maguire
2024-01-29 14:24 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2024-01-29 16:15 ` Daniel Xu
2024-01-29 18:12 ` Alan Maguire
2024-01-31 10:17 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-02-04 18:08 ` Daniel Xu
2024-02-06 12:50 ` Jiri Olsa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zbe1DfHjhZHwIKha@kernel.org \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alan.maguire@oracle.com \
--cc=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=dxu@dxuuu.xyz \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=quentin@isovalent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox