From: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>,
Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Borislav Petkov (AMD)" <bp@alien8.de>,
x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC bpf-next 4/3] uprobe: ensure sys_uretprobe uses sysret
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 12:08:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZflyM5U67c47i4Oo@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240319102523.GC20287@redhat.com>
On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 11:25:24AM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Obviously not for inclusion yet ;) untested, lacks the comments, and I am not
> sure it makes sense.
>
> But I am wondering if this change can speedup uretprobes a bit more. Any chance
> you can test it?
>
> With 1/3 sys_uretprobe() changes regs->r11/cx, this is correct but implies iret.
> See the /* SYSRET requires RCX == RIP and R11 == EFLAGS */ code in do_syscall_64().
nice idea, looks like sysexit should be faster
>
> With this patch uretprobe_syscall_entry restores rcx/r11 itself and does retq,
> sys_uretprobe() needs to hijack regs->ip after uprobe_handle_trampoline() to
> make it possible.
>
> Comments?
>
> Oleg.
> ---
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c b/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
> index 069371e86180..b99f1d80a8c8 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
> @@ -319,6 +319,9 @@ asm (
> "pushq %r11\n"
> "movq $462, %rax\n"
> "syscall\n"
> + "popq %r11\n"
> + "popq %rcx\n"
> + "retq\n"
using rax space on stack for return pointer, cool :)
I'll run the test with this change
thanks,
jirka
> ".global uretprobe_syscall_end\n"
> "uretprobe_syscall_end:\n"
> ".popsection\n"
> @@ -336,23 +339,20 @@ void *arch_uprobe_trampoline(unsigned long *psize)
> SYSCALL_DEFINE0(uretprobe)
> {
> struct pt_regs *regs = task_pt_regs(current);
> - unsigned long sregs[3], err;
> + unsigned long __user *ax_and_ret = (unsigned long __user *)regs->sp + 2;
> + unsigned long ip, err;
>
> - /*
> - * We set rax and syscall itself changes rcx and r11, so the syscall
> - * trampoline saves their original values on stack. We need to read
> - * them and set original register values and fix the rsp pointer back.
> - */
> - err = copy_from_user((void *) &sregs, (void *) regs->sp, sizeof(sregs));
> - WARN_ON_ONCE(err);
> -
> - regs->r11 = sregs[0];
> - regs->cx = sregs[1];
> - regs->ax = sregs[2];
> + ip = regs->ip;
> regs->orig_ax = -1;
> - regs->sp += sizeof(sregs);
> + err = get_user(regs->ax, ax_and_ret);
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(err);
>
> uprobe_handle_trampoline(regs);
> +
> + err = put_user(regs->ip, ax_and_ret);
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(err);
> + regs->ip = ip;
> +
> return regs->ax;
> }
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-19 11:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-18 9:31 [PATCH RFC bpf-next 0/3] uprobe: uretprobe speed up Jiri Olsa
2024-03-18 9:31 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next 1/3] uprobe: Add uretprobe syscall to speed up return probe Jiri Olsa
2024-03-18 14:22 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-03-19 1:11 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-03-19 6:32 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-03-19 16:20 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-03-19 10:54 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-03-18 9:31 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next 2/3] selftests/bpf: Add uretprobe syscall test Jiri Olsa
2024-03-19 1:16 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-03-19 11:09 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-03-18 9:31 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next 3/3] selftests/bpf: Mark uprobe trigger functions with nocf_check attribute Jiri Olsa
2024-03-19 1:22 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-03-19 11:11 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-03-22 13:40 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-03-19 10:25 ` [PATCH RFC bpf-next 4/3] uprobe: ensure sys_uretprobe uses sysret Oleg Nesterov
2024-03-19 11:08 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2024-03-19 16:25 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-03-19 16:38 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-03-19 19:35 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-03-19 19:31 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-03-19 20:13 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-03-20 11:04 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-03-20 14:37 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-03-20 15:28 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-03-20 17:44 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-03-20 19:08 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-03-21 10:10 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-03-21 9:59 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-03-21 10:17 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-03-21 10:52 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-03-21 12:14 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-03-21 20:29 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-03-22 8:48 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZflyM5U67c47i4Oo@krava \
--to=olsajiri@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox