From: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@chromium.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
Viktor Malik <vmalik@redhat.com>,
"Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/7] bpf: Add support for kprobe multi session context
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 13:45:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zijw2-y-PrTJFHmc@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEf4BzZYpaZ-70WU9gCRAcAfYEH9cq5GRyyZatygULKhS7zVZw@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 05:26:45PM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 5:13 AM Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Adding struct bpf_session_run_ctx object to hold session related
> > data, which is atm is_return bool and data pointer coming in
> > following changes.
> >
> > Placing bpf_session_run_ctx layer in between bpf_run_ctx and
> > bpf_kprobe_multi_run_ctx so the session data can be retrieved
> > regardless of if it's kprobe_multi or uprobe_multi link, which
> > support is coming in future. This way both kprobe_multi and
> > uprobe_multi can use same kfuncs to access the session data.
> >
> > Adding bpf_session_is_return kfunc that returns true if the
> > bpf program is executed from the exit probe of the kprobe multi
> > link attached in wrapper mode. It returns false otherwise.
> >
> > Adding new kprobe hook for kprobe program type.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > kernel/bpf/btf.c | 3 ++
> > kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> > 2 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
>
> LGTM, but see the question below
>
> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
>
> [...]
>
> > @@ -2848,7 +2859,7 @@ kprobe_multi_link_handler(struct fprobe *fp, unsigned long fentry_ip,
> > int err;
> >
> > link = container_of(fp, struct bpf_kprobe_multi_link, fp);
> > - err = kprobe_multi_link_prog_run(link, get_entry_ip(fentry_ip), regs);
> > + err = kprobe_multi_link_prog_run(link, get_entry_ip(fentry_ip), regs, false);
> > return is_kprobe_multi_session(link->link.prog) ? err : 0;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -2860,7 +2871,7 @@ kprobe_multi_link_exit_handler(struct fprobe *fp, unsigned long fentry_ip,
> > struct bpf_kprobe_multi_link *link;
> >
> > link = container_of(fp, struct bpf_kprobe_multi_link, fp);
> > - kprobe_multi_link_prog_run(link, get_entry_ip(fentry_ip), regs);
> > + kprobe_multi_link_prog_run(link, get_entry_ip(fentry_ip), regs, true);
>
> Is there some way to figure out whether we are an entry or return
> probe from struct fprobe itself? I was hoping to have a single
> callback for both entry and exit handler in fprobe to keep callback
> call chain a bit simpler
AFAICS not at the moment.. also both callbacks have same arguments,
just the entry handler returns int and exit handler void
jirka
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-24 11:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-22 12:12 [PATCH bpf-next 0/7] bpf: Introduce kprobe_multi session attach Jiri Olsa
2024-04-22 12:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/7] bpf: Add support for kprobe multi " Jiri Olsa
2024-04-24 0:26 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-04-24 11:46 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-04-22 12:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/7] bpf: Add support for kprobe multi session context Jiri Olsa
2024-04-24 0:26 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-04-24 11:45 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2024-04-22 12:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/7] bpf: Add support for kprobe multi session cookie Jiri Olsa
2024-04-22 17:48 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2024-04-22 20:55 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-04-24 0:26 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-04-24 11:45 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-04-22 12:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next 4/7] libbpf: Add support for kprobe multi session attach Jiri Olsa
2024-04-24 0:26 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-04-24 11:45 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-04-22 12:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next 5/7] libbpf: Add kprobe session attach type name to attach_type_name Jiri Olsa
2024-04-24 0:27 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-04-24 11:44 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-04-22 12:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next 6/7] selftests/bpf: Add kprobe multi session test Jiri Olsa
2024-04-24 0:27 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-04-24 11:44 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-04-30 8:10 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-04-22 12:12 ` [PATCH bpf-next 7/7] selftests/bpf: Add kprobe multi wrapper cookie test Jiri Olsa
2024-04-24 0:27 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2024-04-24 11:44 ` Jiri Olsa
2024-04-24 0:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next 0/7] bpf: Introduce kprobe_multi session attach Andrii Nakryiko
2024-04-24 5:12 ` John Fastabend
2024-04-24 11:43 ` Jiri Olsa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zijw2-y-PrTJFHmc@krava \
--to=olsajiri@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=kpsingh@chromium.org \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=sdf@google.com \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=vmalik@redhat.com \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).