BPF List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
To: Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@datadoghq.com>
Cc: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>,
	Jason Xing <kernelxing@tencent.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Recursive locking in sockmap
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2024 09:00:07 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZmMuh5mkK7w7s/3L@pop-os.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALye=_-oqMO-LRWd7pvMUnOxDCNVg0v=Wgmg8Qggg1Q3yL-jmQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Jun 07, 2024 at 02:09:59PM +0200, Vincent Whitchurch wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 6, 2024 at 2:47 PM Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 6, 2024 at 6:00 PM Vincent Whitchurch
> > <vincent.whitchurch@datadoghq.com> wrote:
> > > With a socket in the sockmap, if there's a parser callback installed
> > > and the verdict callback returns SK_PASS, the kernel deadlocks
> > > immediately after the verdict callback is run. This started at commit
> > > 6648e613226e18897231ab5e42ffc29e63fa3365 ("bpf, skmsg: Fix NULL
> > > pointer dereference in sk_psock_skb_ingress_enqueue").
> > >
> > > It can be reproduced by running ./test_sockmap -t ping
> > > --txmsg_pass_skb.  The --txmsg_pass_skb command to test_sockmap is
> > > available in this series:
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240606-sockmap-splice-v1-0-4820a2ab14b5@datadoghq.com/.
> >
> > I don't have time right now to look into this issue carefully until
> > this weekend. BTW, did you mean the patch [2/5] in the link that can
> > solve the problem?
> 
> No.  That patch set addresses a different problem which occurs even if
> only a verdict callback is used. But patch 4/5 in that patch set adds
> the --txmsg_pass_skb option to the test_sockmap test program, and that
> option can be used to reproduce this deadlock too.

I think we can remove that write_lock_bh(&sk->sk_callback_lock). Can you
test the following patch?

------------>

diff --git a/net/core/skmsg.c b/net/core/skmsg.c
index fd20aae30be2..da64ded97f3a 100644
--- a/net/core/skmsg.c
+++ b/net/core/skmsg.c
@@ -1116,9 +1116,7 @@ static void sk_psock_strp_data_ready(struct sock *sk)
 		if (tls_sw_has_ctx_rx(sk)) {
 			psock->saved_data_ready(sk);
 		} else {
-			write_lock_bh(&sk->sk_callback_lock);
 			strp_data_ready(&psock->strp);
-			write_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_callback_lock);
 		}
 	}
 	rcu_read_unlock();

  reply	other threads:[~2024-06-07 16:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-06 10:00 Recursive locking in sockmap Vincent Whitchurch
2024-06-06 12:46 ` Jason Xing
2024-06-07 12:09   ` Vincent Whitchurch
2024-06-07 16:00     ` Cong Wang [this message]
2024-06-13 19:08       ` John Fastabend
2024-07-20 18:20         ` Cong Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZmMuh5mkK7w7s/3L@pop-os.localdomain \
    --to=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jakub@cloudflare.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kerneljasonxing@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernelxing@tencent.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vincent.whitchurch@datadoghq.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox